Table 2.
Estimated mean parameter values for the bias functions corresponding to the respective magnitude cuts.
| Sample id | Magnitude range | Cut |
 |
β | ρg | ϵg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −21.5 ≤ K ≤ −21.0 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | 0.35 | 0.65 | 0.98 | 0.28 |
| 2 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 1.06 | 0.26 | |
| 3 | −22.0 ≤ K ≤ −21.5 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | 0.37 | 0.77 | 1.11 | 0.19 |
| 4 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | 0.24 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.26 | |
| 5 | −22.5 ≤ K ≤ −22.0 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.91 | 0.27 |
| 6 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 1.30 | 0.12 | |
| 7 | −23.0 ≤ K ≤ −22.5 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | 0.19 | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.25 |
| 8 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | 0.24 | 0.76 | 1.08 | 0.12 | |
| 9 | −23.5 ≤ K ≤ −23.0 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | 0.16 | 0.79 | 0.97 | 0.20 |
| 10 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | 0.28 | 0.73 | 1.33 | 0.07 | |
| 11 | −24.0 ≤ K ≤ −23.5 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | 0.19 | 0.77 | 1.61 | 0.09 |
| 12 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 1.31 | 0.05 | |
| 13 | −24.5 ≤ K ≤ −24.0 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | 0.05 | 0.83 | 1.23 | 0.11 |
| 14 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | 0.04 | 0.51 | 0.97 | 0.085 | |
| 15 | −25.0 ≤ K ≤ −24.5 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | 0.01 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 0.12 |
| 16 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 1.19 | 0.1 |
Notes. We note, that for non-linear functions, such as the truncated power-law bias, the means of function parameters do not necessarily agree to the mean of the bias function. As a comparison, in Fig. 6, we also plotted the bias function corresponding to the means of the parameter values.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.