Table 1.
Logarithmic Bayes factors between a density field generated with the LPT and one with the PM model.
| Sample id | Magnitude range | Cut | −log(ℒs/ℒ0) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −21.5 ≤ K ≤ −21.0 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | −159.44 |
| 2 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | −322.79 | |
| 3 | −22.0 ≤ K ≤ −21.5 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | −358.89 |
| 4 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | −644.02 | |
| 5 | −22.5 ≤ K ≤ −22.0 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | −894.60 |
| 6 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | −1280.55 | |
| 7 | −23.0 ≤ K ≤ −22.5 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | −1304.67 |
| 8 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | −2361.86 | |
| 9 | −23.5 ≤ K ≤ −23.0 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | −2478.00 |
| 10 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | −3777.91 | |
| 11 | −24.0 ≤ K ≤ −23.5 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | −2853.92 |
| 12 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | −3653.12 | |
| 13 | −24.5 ≤ K ≤ −24.0 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | −2472.22 |
| 14 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | −1799.82 | |
| 15 | −25.0 ≤ K ≤ −24.5 | K2M + + ≤ 11.5 | −1467.34 |
| 16 | 11.5 < K2M + + ≤ 12.5 | −207.63 |
Notes. It is interesting to note, that the PM model generally outperforms the LPT model in explaining the data. Most improvements are seen for the bright galaxy populations, while regions of fainter galaxies can still be approximated reasonably well with the LPT model.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.