Free Access

Table 2

TiO2 transitions that fall within the spectral range covered by the ALMA observations reported by us.

Transition ν Eu Flux σFlux gu Au,l
(GHz) (K) (10−20 W/m2) (10−20 W/m2) (s−1)
31(4,28)–31(3,29) 329.598 376.53 Blended with UD 63 2.85 × 10−3
50(8,42)–50(7,43) 329.704 1023.25 Not detected 101 5.13 × 10−3
35(20,16)–36(19,17) 330.359 894.53 Not detected 71 4.63 × 10−3
27(8,20)–27(7,21) 331.212 346.43 1.20 0.15 55 4.56 × 10−3
26(8,18)–26(7,19) 331.240 326.60 1.10 0.23 53 4.52 × 10−3
39(8,32)–39(7,33)a 331.382 643.64 0.98 0.14 79 5.03 × 10−3
12(3,9)–11(2,10) 331.600 67.55 Blended with UD 25 1.35 × 10−3
14(4,10)–14(1,13) 332.355 94.54 Not detected 29 1.77 × 10−4
32(19,13)–33(18,16) 332.528 778.07 Not detected 65 4.35 × 10−4
17(8,10)–17(7,11) 341.463 181.68 1.10 0.15 35 4.12 × 10−3
32(3,29)–32(2,30)b 341.594 399.00 Not detected? 65 3.08 × 10−3
16(8,8)–16(7,9) 341.876 169.29 0.91 0.40 33 4.00 × 10−3
41(8,34)–41(7,35)c 342.120 703.68 1.08 0.15 83 5.47 × 10−3
15(8,8)–15(7,9)d 342.217 157.63 0.64 0.12 31 3.85 × 10−3
9(5,5)–8(4,4) 342.345 60.23 0.57 0.10 19 4.71 × 10−3
14(8,6)–14(7,7) 342.491 146.70 Blended with SiO v = 2, J = 8−7 29 3.67 × 10−3
13(8,6)–13(7,7) 342.708 136.51 0.53 0.08 27 3.46 × 10−3
6(6,0)–5(5,1) 342.862 54.87 Blended with UD 13 7.92 × 10−3
12(8,4)–12(7,5) 342.877 127.05 Blended with UD 25 8.43 × 10−3
11(8,4)–11(7,5) 343.004 118.33 Blended with 29SiO v = 0, J = 8−7 23 2.86 × 10−3
46(10,36)–46(9,37) 343.049 903.83 Not detected 93 5.97 × 10−3
23(3,21)–22(2,20) 343.071 208.30 Blended with 33SO NJ = 98−87 and UD 47 5.27 × 10−3
10(8,2)–10(7,3) 343.097 110.33 Blended with 33SO NJ = 98−87 21 2.43 × 10−3
9(8,2)–9(7,3) 343.162 103.06 Blended with UD 19 1.86 × 10−3
8(8,0)–8(7,1) 343.204 96.52 Blended with UD 17 1.09 × 10−3
13(4,10)–12(3,9) 343.243 84.03 Blended with UD 27 2.97 × 10−3

Notes. We give the integrated flux of the detected lines obtained by integrating emission over a circular aperture with 84 mas radius (see text). The blended lines are indicated, and when the blending line is not known, we refer to it as UD (unidentified line). (a)The expected transition at 331.382 GHz was matched to an observed line centred at 331.386 GHz. Since the error on the tabulated frequency was relatively large (2.4 MHz), we identify the line at 331.386 GHz with transition 39(8,32)–39(7,33). (b)A line with flux that fits in the observed rotational diagram was observed at 341.600 GHz. Since the tabulated uncertainty on the transition frequency is relatively small (0.9 MHz), we have not included the line in the fitting procedure. (c)The expected transition at 342.120 GHz was matched to an observed line centred at 342.129 GHz. Since the error on the tabulated frequency was relatively large (2.6 MHz), we identify the line at 342.120 GHz with transition 41(8,34)–41(7,35). (d)Blended with a significantly weaker line.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.