Table 1
Polarization degree and angle estimated around the pulsar and intensity peak positions for POLKA (Wiesemeyer et al. 2014), XPOL (Aumont et al. 2010), SCUPOL (Matthews et al. 2009), and NIKA (this paper).
p[%] | ψeq [°] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
POLKA | 18.2 ± 4.8 | 147.1 ± 7.5 | ||
Pulsar | XPOL | 17.5 ± 1.2 | 150.2 ± 2.0 | |
SCUPOL | 14.8 ± 2.8 | 143.5 ± 4.4 | ||
NIKA | 17.9 ± 2.2 | 138.8 ± 1.5 ± 2.3 | ||
POLKA | 19.4 ± 4.4 | 148.1 ± 6.5 | ||
Intensity Peak | XPOL | 21.0 ± 1.2 | 149.0 ± 1.6 | |
SCUPOL | 16.4 ± 4.8 | 151.8 ± 8.4 | ||
NIKA | 20.3 ± 0.7 | 140.0 ± 1.0 ± 2.3 |
Notes. The values have been estimated using the maps and degrading them to the XPOL angular resolution of 27′′. For NIKA the position of the pulsar, represented on the maps by a black cross, refers to Lobanov et al. (2011). The position of the peak of the total intensity measured on the NIKA maps has equatorial coordinates (J2000) RA = 5h34m32.3804s and Dec = 22°0′44.0982′′. The polarization angle is given here in equatorial coordinates. A systematic angle uncertainty of 2.3° is considered. A total calibration error of 10 % has been accounted for in the flux estimates.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.