Volume 614, June 2018
|Number of page(s)||2|
|Section||Celestial mechanics and astrometry|
|Published online||14 June 2018|
Comment on “Out-of-plane equilibrium points in the restricted three-body problem with oblateness (Research Note)”
School of Astronomy and Space Science, Nanjing University,
2 Key Laboratory of Modern Astronomy and Astrophysics in Ministry of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210046, PR China
Accepted: 26 January 2018
Douskos & Markellos (2006, A&A, 446, 357) first reported the existence of the out-of-plane equilibrium points in restricted three-body problem with oblateness. This result deviates significantly from the intuitive physical point of view that there is no other force that can balance the combined gravitation in Z direction. In fact, the out-of-plane equilibrium in that model is illusory and we prove here that such equilibrium points arise from the improper application of the potential function.
Key words: celestial mechanics / minor planets, asteroids: general / methods: analytical
© ESO 2018
In recent years, several papers by various authors have been devoted to investigating the properties of the out-of-plane equilibrium points, which are located outside the orbital plane of the oblate primary bodies in the restricted three-body problem. This research is mainly based on Douskos & Markellos (2006), which first reported the existence of out-of-plane equilibrium points caused by the J2 term perturbation.
Intuitively, in the Z direction perpendicular to the orbital plane (O − XY), only gravitational forces from both primaries produce an acceleration towards the O − XY plane and no other force can balance such acceleration. Therefore, the existence of such out-of-plane equilibrium points is doubtful. We notice that even Douskos and Markellos suspected that the existence of such points is only a mathematical illusion due to the truncation of the potential.
For the case of oblate ellipsoidal primaries, we analytically show in this report that such equilibrium points proposed by Douskos & Markellos (2006) are located just inside the Brillouin sphere, where the potential function adopted therein is invalid. These equilibrium points do not exist in the physical point of view.
Just as in Douskos & Markellos (2006), let us consider the circular restricted three-body problem, in which a massless body P moves under the gravitational force exerted by an oblate ellipsoid m1 and a point mass m2. We choose the distance between these two primaries as the unit of length, the total mass (m1 + m2) as the unit of mass, and the unit of time is chosen so as to make the gravitational constant G = 1. The motion of the massless body in the synodic frame (see Fig. 1) can be described as (1)
where D is the distance between two primaries, while Re (re) and Rp (rp) are the real (normalized) equatorial and polar radii of the ellipsoid m1, respectively. It is worth noting that the potential of m1 in W is the truncation up to the J2 term of the spherical harmonics expansion of the potential function.
Obviously the gravitational force from the point mass m2 (the first term) and the main part of m1 always pointtowards the XY plane, thus only the component generated by the J2 term of m1 may balance the acceleration towards the XY plane. For any out-of-plane point z≠0, Eq. (4) can be possibly satisfied only if the latter term is negative for some r1, i.e., (5)
It is necessary to have fmin(r1, z) < 0 to make the inequity Eq. (5) true, which gives the estimation of r1, that is (7)
If the rotational ellipsoid satisfies some usual constrains, we can further show that such artificial equilibrium points are even located inside the rotational ellipsoid. Suppose a rotational ellipsoid meets the following conditions: (8)
From Eq. (5), we obtain (11)
Since here gmax depends only on r1 but not z, the estimation given in Eq. (7) shall be taken into account, resulting in (13)
that is, the equilibrium points are inside the ellipsoid. Apparently, such rotational ellipsoid satisfying Eq. (8) is ubiquitous. This gives the counterexamples for the existence of out-of-plane equilibrium because the potential function adopted in Douskos & Markellos (2006) is obviously invalid inside the ellipsoid.
Illustration of the circular restricted three-body problem with oblateness. The origin of the synodic coordinate is in the barycentre. The primary m1 is the rotational ellipsoid whose coordinate is (−μ2, 0, 0), while m2 is the point mass located at (μ1, 0, 0).
Base on the force balance in the Z direction, we have analytically shown that the out-of-plane equilibrium points found in Douskos & Markellos (2006) are located inside the Brillouin sphere of the oblate primary or even below the surface of the ellipsoidal primary body. Since the spherical harmonics expansion of the potential function is not valid at this point, we believe that the existence of these out-of-plane equilibrium points is caused by the improper application of the potential function. In fact, using the closed form of potential function, wecan also prove that the acceleration produced by an ellipsoidal asteroid will always point towards to the O − XY plane, such that no out-of-plane balance point can exist. Surely, this conclusion holds for the case that both primaries are oblate.
We thank the anonymous referee for very helpful comments. This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Grants No.11473016 & No.11333002).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.