Table 1
Best-fitting values of size (D) and beaming parameter (η) and corresponding visible geometric albedos (pV) for all our objects.
Object | H | G | D (km) | p V | η | W3 | W4 | r (au) | Δ (au) | α (degree) | Subsample |
|
|||||||||||
01684 | 10.90 | 0.15 | 30.48 | 0.084 | 1.10 | 10 | 10 | 2.72478 | 2.55661 | 21.33 | SDSSqA |
01962 | 12.00 | 0.15 | 18.72 | 0.086 | 0.94 | 14 | 14 | 3.91083 | 3.67257 | 14.97 | SDSSqA |
02039 | 12.60 | 0.15 | 13.74 | 0.088 | 1.09 | 12 | 12 | 3.56757 | 3.43691 | 16.40 | SDSSqA |
02158 | 11.60 | 0.15 | 23.57 | 0.074 | 1.04 | 11 | 11 | 3.14654 | 2.95260 | 18.20 | SDSSqA |
02264 | 10.70 | 0.15 | 34.10 | 0.080 | 0.96 | 09 | 09 | 2.80443 | 2.62981 | 20.86 | SDSSqA |
02316 | 12.80 | 0.15 | 12.86 | 0.082 | 1.06 | 13 | 13 | 2.57934 | 2.33934 | 22.39 | SDSSqA |
02316 | 12.80 | 0.15 | 13.62 | 0.073 | 1.19 | 16 | 16 | 2.27614 | 1.95035 | 26.42 | SDSSqA |
02404 | 11.70 | 0.15 | 22.83 | 0.073 | 1.11 | 11 | 11 | 3.45341 | 3.20436 | 16.67 | SDSSqA |
02769 | 12.10 | 0.15 | 20.32 | 0.062 | 0.99 | 04 | 06 | 3.11216 | 2.93705 | 18.63 | SDSSqA |
02781 | 11.80 | 0.15 | 21.07 | 0.077 | 1.08 | 17 | 17 | 2.84329 | 2.65271 | 20.93 | SDSSqA |
Notes. Absolute magnitude and slope parameters (H, G) were retrieved from the Minor Planet Center. W3 and W4 indicate the number of observations used in each WISE band. If η could not be fitted, we show the negative adopted value. We took the geometry of observation for each epoch from the Miriade Ephemeris Generator. Here we show average values of heliocentric (r) and geocentric (Δ) distances and phase angle (α). The subsample label indicates whether the object belongs to the SDSS, spectroscopic B, or PCF group. Labels with the suffix “qA” indicate that only data with signal-to-noise ratio >10 were used (see Appendix A for more details). Minimum relative errors of 10%, 15%, and 20% should be considered for D, η, and pV in cases for which η could be fitted. Otherwise, η is fixed to a default value (see Sect. 5.1.2) and the minimum relative errors in size and albedo increase to 20%, and 40% (see e.g. Masiero et al. 2012). Here we provide a small set of results to illustrate the format of the full table. The full table is available at the CDS.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.