Issue |
A&A
Volume 591, July 2016
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A14 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
Section | Planets and planetary systems | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527660 | |
Published online | 03 June 2016 |
Differences between the Pallas collisional family and similarly sized B-type asteroids⋆
1 Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR 7293, Université de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, 06304 Nice Cedex 4, France
e-mail: valilagoa@oca.eu
2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC), c/ vía Láctea s/n, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
3 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38071 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
4 Complejo Astronómico El Leoncito (CONICET), Av. España 1512 sur, J5402DSP San Juan, Argentina
5 Universidad Nacional de San Juan, J. I. de la Roza 590 oeste, 5400 Rivadavia, San Juan, Argentina
6 Physics Department, University of Central Florida, PO Box 162385, Orlando, FL 32816.2385, USA
7 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee, 1412 Circle Dr, Knoxville, TN 37996-1410, USA
8 Florida Space Institute/University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32826-0650, USA
9 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20472-2421, USA
Received: 29 October 2015
Accepted: 14 March 2016
Context. B-type asteroids constitute a peculiar spectral class within the C-complex. Previous work has pointed out the difference between the visible geometric albedos of B-types and those of the Pallas collisional family (PCF), whose few members with observed spectra are B-types (one exception out of eight objects). This has been interpreted as being due to compositional differences. However, the PCF members are typically smaller than the spectroscopically classified B-types, and the following possibilities have not been ruled out: the albedo differences might be related to a size-albedo dependence and/or to the generally larger errors of the WISE data and best-fitting values of the derived parameters expected for smaller objects.
Aims. We compare albedos and beaming parameters of PCF members and B-types of similar sizes and re-examine our conclusion on the different composition of the PCF.
Methods. By modelling their WISE/NEOWISE data, we derived sizes and albedos of all objects whose Sloan Digital Sky Survey reflectances are similar to the typical B-type reflectance spectra. In particular, we derived the so-called infrared beaming parameters (η), effective diameters (D), and corresponding visible geometric albedos (pV), and studied their value distributions.
Results. We obtained the effective diameter and geometric visible albedo for ~600 B-type asteroids whose sizes range between 2 and 100 km, approximately half of which have fitted η-values that are inversely correlated to size. We found that the albedo distributions of the PCF is significantly different from that of other B-types in the same size range (2−20 km), and we rule out any size-albedo dependency or biases related to the lower quality of the pV-values of smaller objects. In addition, we also found differences between the η-value distribution of the PCF and the other similarly-sized B-types.
Conclusions. The differences in the visible albedos of PCF members and the other B-types of similar sizes is a strong indication that their compositions are different. The trend between beaming parameter and size of the B-types (excluding the PCF) is consistent with the expectation that the surfaces of smaller asteroids have coarser rocks than do those of larger objects (D> 40 km), which are thought to be covered by a finer, more insulating layer of dust.
Key words: minor planets, asteroids: general / surveys / infrared: planetary systems
Full Table 1 is only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/591/A14
© ESO, 2016
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.