Table 1
Fit parameters for the baseline models discussed in Sect. 5.
Model 1: | pexrav (var. cold refl.) | ||||
Γ |
![]() |
||||
Ecut (keV) |
![]() |
||||
R |
![]() |
||||
χ2/d.o.f. | 327.1 / 367 | ||||
|
|||||
Model 2: | pexrav (const. refl.) | ||||
Γ |
![]() |
||||
Ecut (keV) |
![]() |
||||
R | 3.8 ± 1.4/1.7 ± 0.8a | ||||
χ2/d.o.f. | 327.7 / 367 | ||||
|
|||||
Model 3: | pexrav × zxipcf (ion. abs.) | ||||
Γ | 2.33 ± 0.10 | ||||
Ecut (keV) |
![]() |
||||
NH (cm-2) | 1.3 ± 0.3 × 1024 | ||||
CF | 0.62 ± 0.1 | ||||
log ξ (erg cm s-1) | 2.4 ± 0.4 b | ||||
χ2/d.o.f. | 325.5 / 365 | ||||
|
|||||
Model 4: | relxill_lp (relativistic refl.) | ||||
Γ | 2.26 ± 0.04 | ||||
h (rG) | < 3.5 | ||||
a | > 0.68 | ||||
cos(i) | > 0.83 | ||||
log ξ (erg cm s-1) | 1.8 ± 0.5 c | ||||
χ2/d.o.f. | 333.8 / 365 |
Notes. Model 1 is a PEXRAV model with all the parameters linked between XMM-Newton and NuSTAR, except for the normalizations. Model 2 has the normalization of the reflection component linked between the XMM-Newton and NuSTAR data, while the primary power law is left free to vary independently, so that the two data sets have two different R parameters. The Γ and high-energy cutoff are linked between the power-law and the reflection component, and between the two data sets. Model 3 includes an ionized absorber with partial covering superimposed on a PEXRAV model with R = 0. Model 4 is a RELXILL_LP relativistic reflection model, where the Ecut is frozen to 300 keV. In Models 1, 2, and 3 the inclination angle is frozen to the default value cos(i) = 0.45.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.