Table 4
Comparison of Type II SN properties.
| SN | Type* | Host galaxy | E(B − V) | μ ** | t0 (MJD)*** | End of rise | Rise time in | ||||||
| Galactic | Host | absolute magnitude | days (rest frame) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
| SN 1990E | II-P | NGC 1035 | 0.022 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | 31.48 ± 0.22 | 47 934.56 | ± 2.56 | −17.69 ± 0.34 | 9.6 | ± 2.6 | a, b, c, d, e | ||
| SN 1999em | II-P | NGC 1637 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 30.23 ± 0.14 | 51 475.87 | ± 2.59 | −16.90 ± 0.14 | 8.3 | ± 2.7 | a, f, g, h, i | ||
| SN 1999gi | II-P | NGC 3184 | 0.017 | 0.19 ± 0.09 | 30.54 ± 0.29 | 51 514.84 | ± 0.34 | −16.75 ± 0.38 | 11.5 | ± 0.6 | a, b, j, k, l | ||
| SN 2002gd | II-P | NGC 7537 | 0.059 | – | 32.87 ± 0.35 | 52 551.5 | ± 2.0 | −16.10 ± 0.35 | 8.1 | ± 2.2 | a, m | ||
| SN 2004du | II-P | UGC 11683 | 0.084 | – | 33.94 ± 0.13 | 53 225.6 | ± 1.1 | −17.67 ± 0.13 | 10.9 | ± 1.5 | a, b, n | ||
| SN 2004et | II-P | NGC 6946 | 0.34 | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 28.37 ± 0.15 | 53 270.61 | ± 0.60 | −17.15 ± 0.24 | 8.6 | ± 0.9 | a, b, o, p, q, r | ||
| SN 2005cs | II-P | NGC 5194 | 0.032 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 29.26 ± 0.33 | 53 548.5 | ± 0.5 | −15.12 ± 0.35 | 3.1 | ± 0.5 | a, s, t, u, v, w, x | ||
| SN 2006bp | II-P | NGC 3953 | 0.027 | – | 31.33 ± 0.19 | 53 833.7 | ± 0.3 | −16.46 ± 0.19 | 6.7 | ± 0.4 | a, b, w, y | ||
| SN 2010id | II-P | NGC 7483 | 0.054 | – | 33.12 ± 0.48 | 55 452.3 | ± 2.0 | −14.37 ± 0.48 | 6.2 | ± 2.0 | a, b, z | ||
| SN 2012A | II-P | NGC 3239 | 0.029 | – | 29.96 ± 0.15 | 55 933.0 |
|
−16.33 ± 0.15 | 8.1 | ± 3.0 | a, A | ||
| SN 2000dc | II-P/II-L | ESO 527-G019 | 0.071 | – | 32.93 ± 0.14 | 51 761.8 | ± 3.5 | −17.25 ± 0.19 | 10.5 | ± 4.9 | a, b, n, B | ||
| SN 2001cy | II-P/II-L | UGC 11927 | 0.185 | – | 33.01 ± 0.12 | 52 085.0 | ± 5.5 | −17.65 ± 0.12 | 5.4 | ± 5.5 | a, b, n, B, C | ||
| SN 2001do | II-P/II-L | UGC 11459 | 0.170 | – | 32.35 ± 0.15 | 52 133.2 | ± 2.0 | −17.27 ± 0.15 | 8.1 | ± 2.0 | a, b, n, B | ||
| SN 2013ej | II-P/II-L | NGC 0628 | 0.061 | – | 29.77 ± 0.28 | 56 496.95 | ± 0.92 | −17.60 ± 0.28 | 12.9 | ± 1.4 | a, b, D, E, F, G, H, I | ||
| SN 1979C | II-L | NGC 4321 | 0.023 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 30.30 ± 0.15 | 43 970 | ± 8 | −18.72 ± 0.37 | 23.9 | ± 8.0 | a, b, J, K, L | ||
| SN 2001fa | II-L | NGC 0673 | 0.069 | – | 34.09 ± 0.27 | 52 197.9 | ± 2.5 | −18.13 ± 0.27 | 7.8 | ± 2.6 | a, b, B, M | ||
| SN 2003hf | II-L | UGC 10586 | 0.019 | – | 35.55 ± 0.04 | 52 863 | ± 2 | −18.46 ± 0.05 | 13.2 | ± 2.1 | a, b, B | ||
| SN 2005dq | II-L | UGC 12177 | 0.070 | – | 34.77 ± 0.03 | 53 608 | ± 4 | −17.50 ± 0.03 | 9.1 | ± 3.9 | a, b, B | ||
| SN 2009hd | II-L | NGC 3627 | 0.030 | 1.20 | 29.86 ± 0.08 | 55 001.6 | ± 3.9 | −17.11 ± 0.16 | 15.9 | ± 4.1 | a, b, N, O, P | ||
| LSQ13cuw | II-L | SDSS J023957.37-083123.8 | 0.023 | – | 36.38 ± 0.13 | 56 593.42 | ± 0.68 | −18.03 ± 0.13 | 15.0 | ± 0.8 | a, b | ||
Notes. a) this paper; b) NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database; c) Pennypacker et al. (1990); d) Schmidt et al. (1993); e) Benetti et al. (1994); f) Li (1999); g) Hamuy et al. (2001); h) Leonard et al. (2002a), Leonard (2002); i) Elmhamdi et al. (2003); j) Nakano & Kushida (1999); k) Trondal et al. (1999); l) Leonard et al. (2002b); m) Spiro et al. (2014); n) Poznanski et al. (2009); o) Yamaoka et al. (2004); p) Li et al. (2005); q) Sahu et al. (2006); r) Maguire et al. (2010); s) Pastorello et al. (2006); t) Takáts & Vinkó (2006); u) Tsvetkov et al. (2006); v) Brown et al. (2007); w) Dessart et al. (2008); x) Pastorello et al. (2009); y) Quimby et al. (2007); z) Gal-Yam et al. (2011); A) Tomasella et al. (2013); B) Faran et al. (2014b); C) Ganeshalingam et al. (2001); D) Shappee et al. (2013); E) Kim et al. (2013); F) Dhungana et al. (2013); G) Valenti et al. (2014); H) Richmond (2014); I) Bose et al. (2015); J) Balinskaia et al. (1980); K) de Vaucouleurs et al. (1981); L) Barbon et al. (1982); M) Filippenko & Chornock (2001); N) Elias-Rosa et al. (2011); O) Kasliwal et al. (2009); P) Monard (2009).
for most SNe the epoch of explosion was adopted from the literature. In the cases where no estimate was given we derived the explosion epoch by taking the average MJD between the first detection and the last pre-discovery non-detection (SNe 1979C, 2000dc, 2001cy, 1999gn, 1999gi, 2009hd, 2001do, 2001fa). For SNe SN 2004du and 2004et no pre-discovery non-detections were reported, we therefore used a low-order polynomial fit to the observed data to estimate the explosion epoch. For SN 1999em we adopted the average of the explosion epochs derived by Hamuy et al. (2001), Leonard et al. (2002a), Leonard (2002) and Elmhamdi et al. (2003) using the expanding photosphere method.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.