Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323293]


Issue
A&A
Volume 568, August 2014
Article Number C1
Number of page(s) 3
Section Interstellar and circumstellar matter
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323293e
Published online 28 August 2014

Errors occurred during the production process. Figures 4, 16, 18, and 20 were published twice. The correct Figs. 3, 4, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 are published below.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Relationship between submillimeter optical-depth and NIR extinction in Orion A. The best linear fit, used to calibrate the data, is shown together with the expected 3σ region, as calculated from direct error propagation in the extinction map.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Same as Fig. 3 for Orion B.

thumbnail Fig. 15

Integral area-extinction relation for Orion A, i.e., the physical cloud area above a given extinction threshold (top panel), and the logarithmic derivative of this quantity (bottom panel). The solid black line shows the result for the entire field, while the solid gray line shows the region covered by Herschel alone. For comparison we also plot as a dashed gray line the same quantity as obtained from the 2MASS/Nicest extinction map and a simple S( >AK)AK-2\hbox{$A_K) \propto A_K^{-2}$} relation as a red line.

thumbnail Fig. 16

Same as Fig. 15 for Orion B.

thumbnail Fig. 17

Function S′(>AK), that is, the probability distribution function (pdf) of the measured column densities for Orion A. In this log–log plot a log-normal distribution would appear as a parabola, and a power law as a straight line. The red line shows the slope of the power law S(AK)AK-3\hbox{$-S'(A_K) \propto A_K^{-3}$}.

thumbnail Fig. 18

Same as Fig. 17 for Orion B.

thumbnail Fig. 19

Integral mass-extinction relation for Orion A, i.e. the cloud mass above a given extinction threshold. The color codes follow the same convention as in Fig. 15.

thumbnail Fig. 20

Same as Fig. 19 for Orion B.


© ESO, 2014

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 3

Relationship between submillimeter optical-depth and NIR extinction in Orion A. The best linear fit, used to calibrate the data, is shown together with the expected 3σ region, as calculated from direct error propagation in the extinction map.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Same as Fig. 3 for Orion B.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 15

Integral area-extinction relation for Orion A, i.e., the physical cloud area above a given extinction threshold (top panel), and the logarithmic derivative of this quantity (bottom panel). The solid black line shows the result for the entire field, while the solid gray line shows the region covered by Herschel alone. For comparison we also plot as a dashed gray line the same quantity as obtained from the 2MASS/Nicest extinction map and a simple S( >AK)AK-2\hbox{$A_K) \propto A_K^{-2}$} relation as a red line.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 16

Same as Fig. 15 for Orion B.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 17

Function S′(>AK), that is, the probability distribution function (pdf) of the measured column densities for Orion A. In this log–log plot a log-normal distribution would appear as a parabola, and a power law as a straight line. The red line shows the slope of the power law S(AK)AK-3\hbox{$-S'(A_K) \propto A_K^{-3}$}.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 18

Same as Fig. 17 for Orion B.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 19

Integral mass-extinction relation for Orion A, i.e. the cloud mass above a given extinction threshold. The color codes follow the same convention as in Fig. 15.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 20

Same as Fig. 19 for Orion B.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.