Table 5
Intermediate-mass black holes in globular clusters. Constraints from kinematical studies.
Name | Method | M GC | ϵ M GC | σ 0 | ϵ σ 0 | M IMBH | ϵ MIMBH | Ref. |
M ⊙ | M ⊙ | km s-1 | km s-1 | M ⊙ | M ⊙ | |||
|
||||||||
47 Tuc | p.m. | 1.1 × 106 | 1.0 × 105 | 11.5 | 2.3 | < 1.5 × 103 | 1 | |
NGC 1851 | l.b. | 3.7 × 105 | 2.6 × 104 | 9.3 | 0.5 | < 2.0 × 103 | 2 | |
NGC 1904 | l.b. | 1.4 × 105 | 1.0 × 104 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 × 103 | 1.0 × 103 | 2 |
NGC 2808 | l.b. | 8.5 × 105 | 1.0 × 105 | 13.4 | 2.6 | < 6.0 × 103 | 3 | |
ω Cen | p.m. | 2.5 × 106 | 2.3 × 105 | 16.0 | 3.2 | < 1.2 × 104 | 4 | |
ω Cen | l.b. | 2.5 × 106 | 2.3 × 105 | 16.0 | 3.2 | 4.7 × 104 | 1.0 × 104 | 5 |
NGC 5286 | l.b. | 4.4 × 105 | 1.8 × 104 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 × 103 | 1.0 × 103 | 6 |
NGC 5694 | l.b. | 2.6 × 105 | 3.0 × 104 | 8.8 | 0.6 | < 8.0 × 103 | 2 | |
NGC 5824 | l.b. | 4.5 × 105 | 3.1 × 104 | 11.2 | 0.4 | < 6.0 × 103 | 2 | |
NGC 6093 | l.b. | 3.4 × 105 | 1.6 × 104 | 9.3 | 0.3 | < 8.0 × 102 | 2 | |
NGC 6266 | p.m. | 8.2 × 105 | 1.7 × 104 | 13.7 | 1.1 | < 4.0 × 103 | 7 | |
NGC 6266 | l.b. | 9.3 × 105 | 2.1 × 104 | 15.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 × 103 | 1.0 × 103 | 2 |
NGC 6388 | l.b. | 1.1 × 106 | 1.7 × 105 | 18.9 | 0.8 | 1.7 × 104 | 9.0 × 103 | 8 |
NGC 6388 | r.v. | 1.1 × 106 | 1.7 × 105 | 13.0 | 2.0 | < 2.0 × 103 | 9 | |
M15 | r.v., p.m. | 6.0 × 105 | 4.0 × 104 | 12.0 | 2.0 | < 3.4 × 103 | 10 | |
G1 | l.b. | 1.1 × 107 | 4.4 × 106 | 25.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 × 104 | 5.0 × 103 | 11 |
M3 | r.v. | 2.7 × 105 | 3.8 × 104 | 7.9 | 0.7 | < 5.3 × 103 | This study | |
M13 | r.v. | 4.0 × 105 | 5.2 × 104 | 9.3 | 0.8 | < 8.1 × 103 | This study | |
M92 | r.v. | 2.3 × 105 | 2.9 × 104 | 8.1 | 0.7 | < 9.8 × 102 | This study |
Notes. Column 2 contains the method(s) used to infer stellar dynamics: proper motions (p.m.), radial velocities (r.v.), or line broadening (l.b.). The upper limits on IMBH masses are 1σ limits.
Reference. (1) McLaughlin et al. (2006); (2) Lützgendorf et al. (2013); (3) Lützgendorf et al. (2012b); (4) van der Marel & Anderson (2010); (5) Noyola et al. (2010); (6) Feldmeier et al. (2013); (7) McNamara et al. (2012); (8) Lützgendorf et al. (2011); (9) Lanzoni et al. (2013); (10) van den Bosch et al. (2006); (11) Gebhardt et al. (2005).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.