Table 5
Best fit to the relations between integrated CO fluxes: SCOy = a × SCOKuno + b.
| SCO y | a | b | ρ 1 | SCOKuno/SCOy(corrected) 2 |
|
|
||||
| SCO Helfer | 0.86(±0.17) | –85.28(±428.62) | 0.90 | 1.02 ± 0.18 |
| SCO Chung | 0.65(±0.08) | 44.84(±157.85) | 0.93 | 1.10 ± 0.43 |
| SCO Young 3 | 0.71(±0.07) | 183.61(±140.59) | 0.88 | 1.12 ± 0.49 |
Notes.
Ratio of the Kuno et al. (2007) to the Helfer et al. (2003), Chung et al. (2009a), and Young et al. (1995) SCO fluxes once these last have been corrected using the relations given in this table. For comparison, SCOKuno/SCOIRAM = 0.83 ± 0.03 for the two HRS galaxies we observed with the IRAM radio telescope.
This relation is not used to correct the Young et al. (1995) data (see text).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.