Table 4
Comparison of CCH and c-C3H2 abundances in different PDRs.
G0 | nH2[ cm-3] | X(CCH)* | X(c-C3H2)* | N(c-C3H2)/N(CCH) | References | |
|
||||||
MonR2 | ||||||
|
||||||
MonR2 IF | 5.7 × 10-9 | 3.5 × 10-11 | 0.006 | (a), (b) | ||
MonR2 MP2 | 2.6 × 10-9***** | 7.6 × 10-11** | 0.029*** | (a), (b) | ||
MonR2 PDR | 5 × 105 | 3 × 106 | 1.7 × 10-8 | 1.4 × 10-10 | 0.008 | a |
MonR2 env | 1–100 | 5 × 104 | 3.5 × 10-9 | 1.4 × 10-11 | 0.004 | (a) |
MonR2 red wing | 1.8 × 10-8 | 7.8 × 10-10 | 0.04 | (a) | ||
|
||||||
Other PDRs | ||||||
|
||||||
Horsehead | 100 | 1 × 105 | 1.4 × 10-8 | 1.1 × 10-9 | 0.08 | (c) |
Oph-W | 400 | 2 × 104 | 6.0 × 10-9 | 6.0 × 10-10 | 0.1 | (d) |
IC 63 | 1500 | 1 × 105 | 1.1 × 10-8 | 9.0 × 10-10 | 0.08 | (d) |
NGC 7023 | 2600 | 104 − 106 | 6.0 × 10-9 | 2.0 × 10-10 | 0.03 | (e), (f), (g) |
Orion Bar | 2 × 104 | 1 × 105 | 2.0 × 10-9 | 3.8 × 10-11 | 0.01–0.03 | (f), (h), (i) |
Notes.
The uncertainty in the abundances is driven by the uncertainty in the H2 gas column density, which is assumed to be a factor of 2.
Calculated using the C18O observations of Ginard et al. (2012) as reference for the H2 gas column density: N(C18O) = 1.3 × 1016 cm-2.
In MP2, we have to rely only on the 3 mm and 1 mm transitions of CCH. Thus, we may underestimate the CCH column density (and consequently, overestimate N(c-C3H2)/N(CCH)) by a factor of 2.
Reference. (a) this work; (b) Ginard et al. (2012); (c) Pety et al. (2005); (d) Teyssier et al. (2004); (e) Fuente et al. (1993); (f) Fuente et al. (2003); (g) Pilleri et al. (2012b); (h) Ungerechts et al. (1997); (i) Fuente et al. (1996).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.