Table 1
Photometric datasets on WASP-33.
LC# | Date [UT] | N | FIL | Source | LC# | Date [UT] | N | FIL | Source | |
|
||||||||||
01 | 2003–2007 | 2285 | I | HATNet | 23X | 2011-10-13 | 505 | J | Kitt Peak | |
02X | 2010-03-03 | 275 | z | FLWO | 24 | 2011-10-23 | 96 | C | LTremosa | |
03 | 2010-08-23 | 245 | R | KHose | 25 | 2011-11-12 | 291 | I | Konkoly | |
04 | 2010-08-26 | 282 | R | FHormuth | 26 | 2011-11-12 | 79 | V | GCorfini | |
05 | 2010-08-26 | 163 | R | RNaves | 27 | 2011-11-14 | 907 | V | SDvorak | |
06 | 2010-09-17 | 220 | R | TScarmato | 28X | 2011-11-23 | 404 | R | JGaitan | |
07 | 2010-09-28 | 277 | R | EHerrero | 29X | 2011-11-23 | 127 | R | RNaves | |
08X | 2010-10-11 | 598 | B | WDauberman | 30 | 2011-11-24 | 446 | I | Konkoly | |
09X | 2010-10-15 | 191 | R | RNaves | 31X | 2011-11-24 | 177 | V | RNaves | |
10 | 2010-10-20 | 434 | R | CLopresti | 32 | 2011-12-01 | 888 | I | TDax | |
11 | 2010-10-20 | 138 | R | RNaves | 33 | 2011-12-10 | 146 | C | FGarcia | |
12 | 2010-11-03 | 451 | z ′ | Kitt Peak | 34 | 2011-12-15 | 109 | I | JGaitan | |
13 | 2010-11-19 | 863 | V | SDvorak | 35X | 2011-12-20 | 149 | V | DGorshanov | |
14 | 2010-12-06 | 1254 | C | SShadick | 36 | 2011-12-21 | 134 | V | RNaves | |
15 | 2010-12-25 | 440 | C | AMaurice | 37 | 2011-12-27 | 230 | C | JLopesino | |
16 | 2011-01-05 | 437 | C | CWiedemair | 38X | 2012-01-01 | 113 | V | RNaves | |
17 | 2011-01-13 | 778 | V | SDvorak | 39X | 2012-01-01 | 420 | C | JLopesino | |
18 | 2011-01-16 | 238 | C | SGajdos | 40 | 2012-01-09 | 316 | I | SShadick | |
19 | 2011-09-21 | 311 | I | SShadick | 41 | 2012-01-12 | 130 | V | RNaves | |
20 | 2011-09-24 | 468 | C | LBrat | 42 | 2012-01-20 | 534 | I | SShadick | |
21X | 2011-10-05 | 196 | R | RNaves | 43 | 2012-02-11 | 365 | I | SShadick | |
22 | 2011-10-13 | 310 | Hα | Kitt Peak |
Notes. Header: LC#: light curve identification number used in this paper; Date: starting date of the observations; N: number of data points (may differ from those given at the ETD site, e.g., because of multiple items); FIL: filter used in the observation (“C” indicates that no filter was used); Source: observer or observatory name. Plots of these light curves are presented in the main body of the paper and in the Appendix. Light curves labeled by “X” are not used in the analysis presented in this paper. They exhibit the following peculiarities. #02: partial transit, difficulties in trend filtering; #08: the transit is deep; #09: deep and skewed transit; #21: deep and skewed transit; #23: near infrared “J” filter is used; #28: large oscillations, earlier and narrower transit (the difference appears to be 28 min!); #29: large oscillations, same night observation as that of #28 but no apparent severe shift in the transit center; #31: deep and skewed transit, is in conflict with the regular behavior observed on the same night (see #30); #35: deeper by >50% than the average transit; #38: deep blip after the ingress; #39: deep blip after the ingress (the same night event as #38).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.