Table 1
Results with the the two methods and two broadbands (Eqs. (23) and (24)).
| Method and |
|
|
α iso | Hrs/ [Hrs] fid | Hrs/ [Hrs] fid |
| broadband | (with WMAP7) | ||||
|
|
|||||
| Method 1 (24) | 85.0/80 | 84.6/78 | 1.035 ± 0.035 | 0.876 ± 0.049  |
0.983 ± 0.035 |
| Method 2 (24) | 71.5/80 | 71.4/78 | 1.010 ± 0.025 | 0.954 ± 0.077  |
1.000 ± 0.036 |
| Method 1 (23) | 104.3/82 | 99.9/80 | 1.027 ± 0.031 | 0.869 ± 0.044  |
0.988 ± 0.034 |
| Method 2 (23) | 88.4/82 | 87.7/80 | 1.004 ± 0.024 | 0.994 ± 0.111  |
1.006 ± 0.032 |
Notes. Columns 2 and 3 give the χ2 for the fiducial model and for the model with the minimum χ2. Column 4 gives the best fit for αiso with the constraint (αt = αr ≡ αiso). Column 5 gives Hrs/ [Hrs] fid with the 2σ limits in parentheses. Column 6 gives the Hrs/ [Hrs] fid deduced by combining our data with that of WMAP7 (Komatsu et al. 2011) (see Sect. 5.3).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.