Free Access
Volume 550, February 2013
Article Number L5
Number of page(s) 5
Section Letters
Published online 24 January 2013

© ESO, 2013

1. Introduction

We initiated an interferometric follow-up of the binary Be star δ Scorpii which has been regularly observed with the VLTI/AMBER (Petrov et al. 2007) and CHARA/VEGA (Mourard et al. 2009) instruments since 2007. In Meilland et al. (2011), hereafter Paper I, we managed to refine δ Scorpii’s binary orbit and the orbital period was the only orbital element which was significantly different from the one determined by Tango et al. (2009). Consequently, we determined that the next periastron should take place around 2011 July 5 (± 4 days). This result was also confirmed by Tycner et al. (2011). Thanks to the combination of high spectral and spatial resolution we constrained the geometry and the kinematics of δ Scorpii’s circumstellar environment. We confirmed that the line emission originates from a dense equatorial disk fully dominated by rotation. We found that the rotation appears to be Keplerian, with an inner boundary (photosphere/disk interface) rotating close to the critical velocity (Vc). The expansion was found to be approximately 0.2 km s-1.

With the measured vsini of 175 km s-1 (Berbacca & Perinotto 1970), and the determined inclination angle of 28  ±  8° we inferred that the star rotates between 60% and 105% of its critical velocity. Moreover, taking into account a possible underestimation of the vsini because of gravity darkening (Townsend et al. 2004), the lower limit on the stellar rotation would rise to about 70% Vc. Finally, we measured the extension in the Hα line, i.e., 4.8  ±  1.5 mas, which is about the same as the binary separation at the periastron, i.e., 5.9 mas. Thus, we suggested that a strong interaction between the already ejected matter and the companion should occur during the periastron passage.

This letter is organized as follows: in Sect. 2 we briefly summarize other recent observations of δ Scorpii; in Sect. 3 we present our VLTI/AMBER observations and the data reduction. In Sect. 4, the data are analyzed and compared to those acquired in April 2010, one year before the periastron, and finally, a short conclusion is drawn in Sect. 5.

2. Recent observations of δ Scorpii

the star δ Scorpii (7 Scorpii, HR 5953, HD 143275) was observed by Millan-Gabet et al. (2010) using the CHARA/MIRC instrument in the H band. They resolved an elongated disk with a Gaussian FWHM of 1.18  ×  0.91 mas. In the K band the disk was only marginally spatially resolved and they estimated an uncertain continuum disk FWHM of 0.7  ±  0.3 mas. When taking into account the continuum/line flux ratio they obtained much larger sizes for the line emission regions, i.e., 2.2  ±  0.4 mas for He i and 1.9  ±  0.3 mas for Brγ. In Paper I, we resolved the circumstellar disk in the Hα (FWHM =  4.8  ±   1.5 mas), Brγ (FWHM = 2.9 ± 0.5 mas), and the 2.06 μm HeI (FWHM = 2.4  ±  0.3 mas) lines, as well as in the K-band continuum (FWHM ~ 2.4 mas).

In a recent paper Che et al. (2012) imaged the disk distortion near the periastron. They revised the binary orbit and studied the primary disk properties during the periastron with NPOI and CHARA/MIRC interferometers. They were able to fit a global model where the secondary follows a Keplerian orbit, as already mentioned in Paper I, and the disk properties were found to be stable through all their observations. The estimated the new periastron passage to be UT 2011 July 3 07:00  ±  4:30 which is within the error bar of the prediction made in Paper I. They also estimated the mass of the secondary, based on the revised binary orbit and radial velocity (RV) measurements from Miroshnichenko et al. (2001), to be  ~6 M with the primary mass 13.9 M estimated from v sin i, apparent Teff, and V-band photometry measurements. The mutual angles between the disk mid-plane and orbital plane were estimated to be either  ~119° or  ~171°. From the fitted global model, they also found that  ~3% of the H-band flux comes from a fully resolved envelope. The primary disk was found to be mainly symmetric and stable, contributing to 71.4  ±  2.7% of the total H-band flux. This implies a quiescent inner disk and no ongoing material outflow after the periastron which is very different from what we obtained in the K band.

On the other hand, Rivinius et al. (2012) conducted a spectroscopic study of δ Scorpii emission lines during the periastron. They found that Hα and Hβ profiles were strongly modified at the periastron. The major modification was that the Violet/Red (V/R) ratio went from V/R > 1 to V/R < 1 in only a few days. They argued that this was due to the direct tidal effect of the companion on the primary disk.

We note that we looked at many Hα and Hβ observations made by amateurs available in the BeSS database1 and that the line profiles did not change significantly from the state detected by Rivinius et al. (2012) after the periastron.

3. Observations and data reduction

The star δ Scorpii was observed in June 2012 during two half-nights with the VLTI 1.6 m auxiliary telescopes (AT) using the AMBER beam recombiner (Petrov et al. 2007). The observations were carried out using high spectral resolution mode (R = 12 000) centered on either Brγ or He i (2.06 μm) for each of the two half-nights. In order to enhance the signal-over-noise ratio (S/N) by enabling longer exposure time, the fringe tracker FINITO was also used. The star HD 139663 (D = 2.133  ±  0.147 mas, Lafrasse et al. 2010) was used as an interferometric calibrator.

The data were reduced using the standard AMBER data reduction software amdlib v3.0.3b1 (see Tatulli et al. 2007; and Chelli et al. 2009, for detailed information on the AMBER data reduction). The average-raw complex visibility and closure phase was determined using the standard method, i.e., keeping the 20% of the frames with the higher S/N ratio. The interferometric calibration was then done using custom-made scripts2 described in Millour et al. (2008). The (u,v) plan coverage for all the observations is plotted in Fig. 1.

thumbnail Fig. 1

δ Scorpii (u,v) 49lan coverage obtained in 2012 with VLTI/AMBER observations centered on Brγ (left) and 2.06 μm He i (right) emission lines.

Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 2

2010 (in red) and 2012 (in blue) Brγ VLTI/AMBER data for a similar projected triplet of baselines.

Open with DEXTER

4. The disk geometry and kinematics

4.1. Qualitative comparison of the 2010 and 2012 data

The Brγ and He i absolute visibility show a strong variability with an amplitude of about 0.2. Assuming that the binary separation at the epoch of the observations should be 90.8 mas with a position angle (PA) of 156.08°, according to Paper I orbital parameters, these variations are compatible both in terms of amplitude and frequency with the binary modulation. However, the accuracy of the absolute visibility of VLTI/AMBER data taken in HR mode is not sufficient to significantly refine the orbital parameters.

The differential visibilities and phases, closure phase, and line profile from the 2010 Brγ observation are plotted in Fig. 2. In the same figure, one single Brγ 2012 observation with similar projected baselines is overplotted. The full 2012 dataset for Brγ and He i emission lines is presented in Fig. 3 (available in electronic form).

The visibility and phase variations shown in Fig. 2 are typical for a rotating disk. As discussed in detail in Meilland et al. (2012), the morphology of visibility variations for a purely rotating disk depends on the baseline orientation. Considering a non-fully resolving baseline, the variation is V-shaped for a baseline aligned with the disk’s minor axis (baseline 1 of Fig. 2) and W-shaped for a baseline aligned with the major axis (baseline 2 of Fig. 2). Baselines with intermediate orientation exhibit intermediate morphologies (see, for example, the weak W-shaped variation for the third baseline shown in Fig. 2).

Table 1

VLTI/AMBER log for the 2012 δ Scorpii observations.

The S-shaped phase variations also strongly depend on the baseline orientation. In the case of a purely rotating disk, the amplitude is maximum for a baseline aligned with the major axis and zero for a perpendicular baseline. Thus, from the simple analysis of data shown in Fig. 2 it seems that the disk orientation did not significantly change between 2010 and 2012 with the major axis being oriented roughly in the direction north-south.

However, Fig. 2 also clearly shows important changes in the visibilities, phases, and line profile between 2010 and 2012. Some of them favor the hypothesis of a significant growth of the equatorial disk between the two epochs:

  • The visibility drop is clearly deeper in 2012.

  • The 2012 S-shaped phase variations are larger.

  • The 2012 line profile equivalent width (EW) is larger.

  • the double-peak separation is narrower in 2012.

Nevertheless, other major changes seen in Fig. 2 are not related to a growth of the disk:

  • The V/R ratio went from 1.2 in 2010 to 0.9 in 2012.

  • The W-shaped-visibilities peak ratio is reversed.

  • The 2012 S-shaped phase variations are asymmetric.

Such changes of asymmetries in the spectrum, visibilities, and phases across the Brγ line, are clear evidence of changes in the circumstellar matter distribution around the star. In the case of a rotating disk, these asymmetries usually stems from the inhomogeneity of the disk. The origin and nature of the disk’s inhomogeneities and their evolution around the periastron are discussed in Sect. 4.3.

We note that all this evidence of the evolution of the disk around δ Scorpii between 2010 and 2012 are seen not only in the data plotted in Fig. 2, but also on all the Brγ and He i dataset (see Fig. 3).

4.2. Modeling of the 2012 data using the kinematic model

To model the wavelength dependence of the visibility, differential phase, and closure phase in the observed emission lines we used the simple kinematic model developed for fast fitting of an expanding and/or rotating thin equatorial disk already described in Paper I. The model is presented in more detail in Delaa et al. (2011) and Meilland et al. (2012).

We used the best-fit model parameters of the 2010 data from Paper I as a starting model. As expected, we obtained a very unsatisfactory fit with a of 24.7. We then assumed that the stellar and kinematics parameters should not change between 2010 and 2012, and that only the Brγ and He i disk extension and line equivalent width (EW) should have evolved. In this case we found a best-fit model for FWHMBrγ = 8.0  ±  0.5 R   (4.2  ±  0.3 mas), EWBrγ = 7.2  ±  0.3 Å, FWHMHeI = 5.2  ±  0.3 R   (2.8  ±  0.2 mas), and EWHeI = 9.1  ±  0.3 Å. However, for this set of values the is still high, i.e., 17.4.

We then performed a fit after releasing constraints on the stellar inclination angle (i), disk major axis orientation (PA), and disk kinematics, i.e., rotational velocity at the photosphere (Vrot) and exponent of the rotational law in the disk (β). Thus, the only fixed parameters for this set of models are the distance taken from van Leeuwen (2007) and the stellar radius taken from Paper I. The best-fit model parameters are presented in Table 2 and the model visibility, phases, and line profiles are overplotted on Fig. 3 (online only).

The for this best-fit model, however, is still high, i.e., 14.6. By separating the fit on each line we found that the He i data have a significantly better fit (i.e., ) than the Brγ data (). For both lines, the largest deviations between the observations and the data comes from the asymmetrical shape of the line profile as well as some visibility and phase variations. This effect will be discussed in the next section.

Table 2

The 2010 and 2012 best-fit kinematic models.

We also note a second source of deviation. Our best-fit model clearly underestimates the visibility for baselines close to the disk’s minor axis. However, using a larger disk extension, we would overestimate the visibility for the other baselines and the over-resolution of the disk would strongly modify the shape of the phase variations. Such underestimation of the minor-axis visibility was already detected for α Col, one of the Be stars observed with VLTI/AMBER (Meilland et al. 2012). However, its origins remain unknown.

4.3. The disk asymmetry

Okazaki (1997) proposed that the cyclic variation of the V/R peak ratio with a period of several years originates in the precession of one-armed density waves in the disk. This assumption was compatible with spectro-interferometric observations of γ Cas (Berio et al. 1999), κ CMa (Meilland et al. 2007), and ζ Tau (Caricofi et al. 2009). This could also explain the change of the peaks ratio of the W-shaped visibility seen in Fig. 2. However, according to observations made by Rivinus et al. (2012), the V/R changes for δ Scorpii occurred during a very short timescale of a few weeks around the periastron. Thus, it seems that the hypothesis of the one-arm oscillation cannot explain the current disk properties.

We also note that, using our simple axisymmetric model, we obtained a better fit on the He i data than on the Brγ data. Considering that the Brγ emission line is formed further from the primary, it is supposed to be more perturbed by the companion tidal forces than the He i line. Consequently, the worse fit of the Brγ data might be a clue of a more important tidal perturbation. One can also argue that the broad-band measurements taken by Che et al. (2012) could not detect any tidal effect as the H-band continuum stems from an even smaller part of the disk than the He i line. Nevertheless, in the frame of an asymmetry induced by tidal effects in June−July 2011, it is also difficult to understand why the V/R remained almost constant between July 2011 and our observations in June 2012. One should expect the induced inhomogeneity to be either in co-rotation or precession, causing cyclical V/R variations with timescales ranging from weeks to years that are not seen in the available spectroscopic data.

4.4. Evolution of the disk extension

Our VLTI/AMBER data clearly gives evidence that the Brγ emission FWHM increased by about 40% (i.e., 2.3  ±  1.3 R  ) between 2010 and 2012. Assuming that this was directly cause by a physical growth of the circumstellar disk we derived a mean expansion velocity of 0.20  ±  0.11 km s-1. This value is similar to the one previously determined for δ Scorpii by Miroshnichenko et al. (2003) for the 2001−2003 period, i.e., 0.4 km s-1, and the one derived in Paper I for the 2000−2005 and 2005−2007 periods, 0.24 km s-1 and 0.19 km s-1, respectively. It is also compatible with the one determined by Kanaan et al. (2008) for the transient disk surrounding the binary Be star Achernar, i.e., 0.27  ±  0.08 km s-1.

The He i line, however, did not exhibit the same variation as the Brγ line. Its growth, of about 8%, remains within the uncertainties of the derived extension. One possible explanation for this difference is that He i has a higher excitation energy. Consequently, it is produced by denser and hotter material than Brγ. Thus, even if the disk is increasing in size as a function of time the He i emitting region should remain compact, whereas the Brγ may be produced in the newly formed outer part of the disk.

In a recent paper, Stee et al. (2013) measured the disk extension in these two lines for the relatively steady disk of the Be star HD 110432. The values derived for their measurement using the same methods showed that the He i emission is about 25%

smaller than the Brγ emission. This value is between the one we found for δ Scorpii for our 2010 (18%) and 2012 (37%) models.

5. Conclusion

Using the unique high spectral and spatial resolutions of the VLTI/AMBER instrument, we studied the evolution of δ Scorpii’s circumstellar environment one year before and one year after the 2011 periastron passage. At both epochs, the data clearly shows that the ejected matter is located in a thin equatorial disk in Keplerian rotation as it is for other observed Be stars. Since 2000, the disk seems to have grown with a quasi-constant velocity of about 0.2 km s-1 and was still growing during the 2010−2012 period. Such speed is compatible with the viscous excretion disk model proposed by Lee et al. (1991).

We found evidence that the disk was asymmetric at both epochs of our observations, but with a different morphology in 2010 and 2012. According to spectroscopic observations made by Rivinius et al. (2012), the major modifications occurred near the periastron. Thus, the observed asymmetry cannot originate from a one-arm oscillation as proposed by Okazaki (1997), but must stem from tidal effects induced by δ Scorpii’s companion. However, according to available spectroscopic data and our 2012 observations, the disk asymmetry seems to be “frozen” since the periastron. Finally, long-term spectroscopic and interferometric follow-up are needed to understand both the nature of the inhomogeneity after the periastron and its link with the tidal effects of the companion.


The Programme National de Physique Stellaire (PNPS) and the Institut National en Sciences de l’Univers (INSU) are acknowledged for their financial supports. A. Meilland acknowledge financial support from the University of Western Ontario. The authors would like to thank ESO staff for their help to make the observations a success and more particularly J.-B. Lebouquin and F. Rantakyro.


  1. Berio, P., Stee, Ph., Vakili, F., et al. 1999, A&A, 345, 203 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berbacca, P. L., & Perinotto, M. 1970, Contr. Oss. Astrof. Padova in Asiago, 239, 1 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carciofi, A. C., Okazaki, A. T., le Bouquin, J.-B., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 915 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Che, X., Monnier, J. D., Tycner, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 29 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chelli, A., Utrera, O. H., & Duvert, G. 2009, A&A, 502, 705 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Delaa, O., Stee, Ph., & Meilland, A. 2011, A&A, 529, A87 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kanaan, S., Meilland, A., Stee, Ph., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 785 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lafrasse, S., Mella, G., Bonneau, D., et al. 2010, JMMC Stellar Diameters Catalogue [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee, U., Saio, H., & Osaki, Y. 1991, MNRAS, 250, 432 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meilland, A., Millour, F., Stee, P., et al. 2007, A&A, 464, 73 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meilland, A., Delaa, O., Stee, Ph., et al. 2011, A&A, 532, A80 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meilland, A., Millour, F., Kanaan, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A110 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Millan-Gabet, R., Monnier, J. D., Touhami, Y., et al. 2010, ApJ, 723, 544 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Millour, F., Valat, B., Petrov, R. G., & Vannier, M. 2008, SPIE, 7013, 132 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miroshnichenko, A. S., Fabregat, J., Bjorkman, K. S., et al. 2001, A&A, 377, 485 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miroshnichenko, A. S., Bjorkman, K. S., Morrison, N. D., et al. 2003, A&A, 408, 305 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mourard, D., Clausse, J. M., Marcotto, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 1073 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. Okazaki, A. T. 1997, A&A, 318, 548 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  19. Petrov, R. G., Malbet, F., Weigelt, G., et al. 2007, A&A, 464, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rivinius, Th., Stefl, S., Baade, D., et al. 2012, ASP Conf. Ser., 464, in press [Google Scholar]
  21. Stee, Ph., Meilland, A., Bendjoya, Ph., et al. 2013, A&A, in press DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220302 [Google Scholar]
  22. Tango, W. J., Davis, J., Jacob, A. P., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 842 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tatulli, E., Millour, F., Chelli, A., et al. 2007, 464, 29 [Google Scholar]
  24. Tycner, C., Ames, A., Zavala, R. T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Townsend, R. H., Owocki, S. P., & Howarth, I. D. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 189 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Online material

thumbnail Fig. 3

The full dataset for the δ Sorpii 2012 VLTI/AMBER observations. The red lines represent the VLTI/AMBER data, and green lines, the best-fit symmetric kinematic model.

Open with DEXTER

All Tables

Table 1

VLTI/AMBER log for the 2012 δ Scorpii observations.

Table 2

The 2010 and 2012 best-fit kinematic models.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

δ Scorpii (u,v) 49lan coverage obtained in 2012 with VLTI/AMBER observations centered on Brγ (left) and 2.06 μm He i (right) emission lines.

Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

2010 (in red) and 2012 (in blue) Brγ VLTI/AMBER data for a similar projected triplet of baselines.

Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

The full dataset for the δ Sorpii 2012 VLTI/AMBER observations. The red lines represent the VLTI/AMBER data, and green lines, the best-fit symmetric kinematic model.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.