Issue 
A&A
Volume 550, February 2013



Article Number  A75  
Number of page(s)  14  
Section  Planets and planetary systems  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201220083  
Published online  29 January 2013 
Impact of stellar companions on precise radial velocities^{⋆}
^{1}
Centro de Astrofísica da Universidade do Porto,
Rua das Estrelas,
4150762
Porto,
Portugal
email: Diana.Cunha@astro.up.pt
^{2}
Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências,
Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo
Alegre 687, 4169007
Porto,
Portugal
^{3}
Observatoire Astronomique de l’Université de Genève,
51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290
Sauverny, Versoix,
Suisse
^{4}
ASD, IMCCECNRS UMR 8028, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC,
77 avenue
DenfertRochereau, 75014
Paris,
France
Received: 23 July 2012
Accepted: 29 November 2012
Context. With the announced arrival of instruments such as ESPRESSO one can expect that several systematic noise sources on the measurement of precise radial velocity will become the limiting factor instead of photon noise. A stellar companion within the fiber is such a possible noise source.
Aims. With this work we aim at characterizing the impact of a stellar companion within the fiber to radial velocity measurements made by fiberfed spectrographs. We consider the contaminant star either to be part of a binary system whose primary star is the target star, or as a background/foreground star.
Methods. To carry out our study, we used HARPS spectra, coadded the target with contaminant spectra, and then compared the resulting radial velocity with that obtained from the original target spectrum. We repeated this procedure and used different tunable knobs to reproduce the previously mentioned scenarios.
Results. We find that the impact on the radial velocity calculation is a function of the difference between individual radial velocities, of the difference between target and contaminant magnitude, and also of their spectral types. For the worstcase scenario in which both target and contaminant star are wellcentered on the fiber, the maximum contamination for a G or K star may be higher than 10 cm s^{1}, on average, if the difference between target and contaminant magnitude is Δm < 10, and higher than 1 m/s if Δm < 8. If the target star is of spectral type M, Δm < 8 produces the same contamination of 10 cm s^{1}, and a contamination may be higher than 1 m/s if Δm < 6.
Key words: techniques: radial velocities / planets and satellites: detection
Appendices are available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org
© ESO, 2013
1. Introduction
The search for extrasolar planets is currently a very active field of research in astronomy. Since the first discovery of Mayor & Queloz (1995), more than 800 planets were discovered^{1}, of which 80% were detected with the radial velocity method (RV). Because it is the workhorse for planetary detections, this method received much attention from the community, which constantly increased its precision (for some of the latest results check Mayor et al. 2011) and tried to characterize its limitations.
One of the fundamental drawbacks is that it is an indirect method, and therefore one should be extremely careful with false positives, i.e., signals created by other planetary RV signals. The literature provides many examples and techniques used to pinpoint these signals (e.g. Queloz et al. 2001; Santos et al. 2002; Melo et al. 2007; Huélamo et al. 2008; Figueira et al. 2010) or to average them out (Dumusque et al. 2011b,a). With the advent of very high precision spectrographs, such as ESPRESSO or CODEX (Pepe et al. 2010), the RV precision enters a new domain, that of cm s^{1}, which in turn will increase the quality of our characterization of these unwanted yet ubiquitous signals (e.g. Cegla et al. 2012).
Here we address a so far unexplored mechanism that is capable of distorting RV signals and creating false ones: the contamination of the main spectrum by that of a (usually unresolved or otherwise undetectable) companion. We consider two different cases:

1.
that of a faint gravitationally bounded companion; and

2.
that of an unbound star that is aligned with the target at the moment of observation.
We assumed the target stars to be placed at the Galaxy disk edge to consider a representative case that encompasses several scenarios of contaminant stars. We used real high signal to noise ratio (S/N) observations obtained with HARPS to create the composite spectra and process these with the RV calculation pipeline to evaluate the impact of the contamination in the most realistic way possible. While we aim at characterizing this effect down to the precision level of ESPRESSO, 10 cm s^{1}, it can be assessed at an even lower precision level.
Although this study is performed to characterize the impact on the RV when using the crosscorrelation function (CCF), point spread function (PSF) modeling will also be affected by stellar companions, if in a different way. The results of this study are particularly interesting for deep surveys in crowded fields (Kepler).
If the contaminant RV remains constant, stellar blends will only cause a undetectable contamination in the RV calculation. However, if the contaminant RV is changing, if the seeing varies, or if there are guiding problems during observations, the effect of the contamination will no longer be constant and it might mimic the presence of a planet. As an example of a false positive caused by blended stars we refer to the work of Santos et al. (2002), in which RV measurements derived from CORALIE blended spectra of HD 41004 AB have unveiled a radialvelocity variation with a period of 1.3 days and a small amplitude of 50 m/s, compatible with the signal expected to be caused by a planetary companion to HD 41004 A. Another example is WASP9b, which was discarded as a planet after it was discovered that the signal was due to a fortuitous alignment (Triaud, priv. comm.).
In Sect. 2 we explain which stars we consider most likely to contribute to a shift in the RV calculation, if the star is either in a G, K or Mdwarf binary system, or is affected by a fortuitous alignment. Then, in Sect. 3 we describe the properties of the spectra used in our simulations. In Sect. 4 we describe the method used to scramble spectra from target star and stellar companion. Results from our work, assuming the worstcase scenario in which both target and contaminant are well centered on the fiber, are shown in Sect. 5. The results are followed by a statistical analysis in Sect. 5.4, which is based on these results, but assumes a more realistic situation, in which the contaminant star may not be fiber centered. In Sect. 6 we discuss our work, and we present our conclusions in Sect. 7.
2. Contaminant cases
When one observes a target star, a secondary star may be present, even without one’s knowledge. This secondary star may be a source of contamination for the calculation of the target star’s RV. Secondary/contaminants stars may appear as two different types: real binaries or fortuitous alignments.
2.1. Real binaries
In the case of a real binary system, the contaminant star will be gravitationally bound. In this section we present the probability distributions of real binary properties that we used in our work.
Here, for G and K primaries we based our study on the results of Duquennoy & Mayor (1991), who studied the multiplicity among solartype stars in the solar neighborhood. They considered a subsample of 164 primary stars with spectral types between F7 and G9. Using Table 7 of Duquennoy & Mayor (1991) on the massratio distribution among Gdwarfs binaries, we can calculate the probability of observing a binary with a massratio q = M_{2}/M_{1}, where M_{2} is the mass of the secondary star and M_{1} the mass of the primary. These probabilities are shown in Table 1, in which we can see that there is a maximum for the massratio range ]0.2,0.3]. The distribution of orbital periods (P) of their study is approximated to a Gaussian with and σ_{log P} = 2.3.
Duquennoy & Mayor also presented the eccentricity distribution for P < 1000 and P > 1000 days, shown here in Table 2.
We stress that there is a large uncertainty for VLMC (very low mass companion) binaries (with q < 0.1), and that this study does not include values of q below 0.01. We also emphasize that this mass ratio distribution is calculated for binary stars, but we recall that, also according to Duquennoy & Mayor (1991), there are 57% of binary systems with a mass ratio higher than 0.1, and 43% of apparently single stars. Of these 43%, (8 ± 6)% most probably have a VLMC, which puts the percentage of single stars at ~30%.
Probability of observing a binary with a mass ratio q = M_{2}/M_{1} among Gdwarf binaries for periods P < 10^{4} days and P < 10^{4}.
Probability of observing a binary with an eccentricity e among Gdwarfs binaries for periods P < 10^{3} days and P < 10^{3}.
For Mdwarfs we used the distributions of mass ratio, q, and semimajor axis, a, from the work of Janson et al. (2012) on Mdwarf multiplicity. The authors suggest an Mdwarf total multiplicity fraction of 34%. Table 3 shows the probability of observing an Mdwarf binary with a mass ratio q. Janson et al. found a uniform distribution to be more consistent with the mass ratio of their observed sample, than a rising distribution. Accordingly, we assumed their uniform distribution in our work. For the semimajor axis distribution Janson et al. (2012) also compared the Sunlike and the narrow distribution, finding the latter to be more consistent with their sample. We therefore used this distribution, which is shown in Table 4. As no information was given on the eccentricity distribution for Mdwarf binaries, we assumed the distribution from Duquennoy & Mayor (1991).
These distributions were used in our statistical analysis (Sect. 5.4).
Probability of observing an Mdwarf binary with a mass ratio q = M_{2}/M_{1}.
Probability of observing an Mdwarf binary with a certain log a.
2.2. Fortuitous alignment
Even if the target star is a single star, an alignment with a background/foreground object may occur. To study the probability of such an event we used the Besançon model (Robin et al. 2003). This allows one to compute the probable stellar content on a given direction of the Galaxy, permitting one to infer the most probable contaminants. To do so, we simulated an observation in the direction of the HD 85512 coordinates, (l,b) = (271.6759,8.1599), which is positioned at the border of the Galactic disk. We also considered a distance interval of 50 kpc (approximately the diameter of the Milky Way), magnitudes between 0 and 30, and a solid angle for a radius of 3°. The objective was to have a large number of stars for each bin of magnitude and spectral type and then to divide it by the ratio between the area considered and that for the HARPS fiber (radius of 0.5 arcsec), thus obtaining the density of stars or the probability to have a fortuitous alignment within the HARPS fiber. In Fig. 1 we present a contour plot of the total number of stars obtained in the simulation for each bin of magnitude and spectral type. For more details on these values and the values for the star density when normalized for a HARPS size fiber, see Appendix A. The most probable contaminants for the accidental alignments are shown in Table 5.
Most probable contaminants for the fortuitous alignments.
Fig. 1 Number of stars in each bin of spectral type and magnitude (radius of 3°). 

Open with DEXTER 
3. Data
We contemplated target stars from spectral type G to late M, with visual magnitudes, m_{v}, between 5 and 15. As described in the previous section (Sect. 2.2), the most probable contaminant stars are of spectral types FGKM. To represent both target and contaminant spectral types, we chose spectra from nine stars, which are shown in Table 6.
We used spectra with an S/N at the center of the spectral order number 50 (which corresponds to a wavelength of 437.28 nm), varying between 15 for an M star, and 450 for a G star. The S/N values of these spectra can be found in Table 6. The stars were chosen because they had the highest S/N in their spectral type range, as observed with HARPS.
Stars used in our simulations, their spectral type, visual magnitude (m_{v}) and S/N at the center of the spectral order 50 (SN50).
4. Method
The goal of this work is to study possible stellar contamination of a target star. To do so, we coadded target and contaminant spectra. We not only considered contaminant stars of spectral types F2, F5, G2, G8, K0/K1, K5, M1, and M3, but also different ratios of magnitude between target star and contaminant as well as differences in RV. To sum two spectra with these particular conditions is not trivial. We need to control the magnitudes and RVs.
We set the magnitude V of the target (m_{t}) star according to the data available in Simbad^{2} and then calculated the magnitude of the contaminant (m_{c}) with respect to the target star using the apparent magnitude – flux relation. We also considered the relative RV between the two spectra as a tunable knob. However, when processing our spectra using the HARPS pipeline the reduction takes into account the header (and properties) of the parent spectra. To overcome this situation we calculated the contaminant RV in the target reference frame and shifted it afterwards.
We then coadded the target spectrum with the modified contaminant spectra and processed the result with the HARPS RV pipeline.
More details of the method are presented in Appendix B.
4.1. The “real binaries” star strategy
To study the impact of a companion on the RV calculation of a binary primary star, we reproduced the cases discussed in the work of Duquennoy & Mayor (1991). We considered a primary G2 star with six different secondary/contaminant stars: G2, G8, K1, K5, M1, and M3.
The first case had a G2 as contaminant with positive and negative values of , where RVC_{t} is the target barycentric radial velocity (drift corrected) without contamination, and is the contaminant barycentric radial velocity (drift corrected) in the target reference frame. In Fig. 2 we show the impact, , of the stellar companion on the target RV, where is the target barycentric radial velocity (drift corrected) with contamination.
Fig. 2 Shift of a G2 target RV caused by a contaminant of the same spectral type and magnitude, m_{v}, in function of the difference between individual radial velocities. 

Open with DEXTER 
For each targetcontaminant pair we considered a range of ΔRV between 0 and 30 [km s^{1}] (in steps of 1 [km s^{1}]), except for a secondary star of spectral type K5 in which the maximum ΔRV was of 24 [km s^{1}] (see Appendix B for details).
4.2. Fortuitous alignment strategy
The fortuitous alignment case is more generic. Here we considered six spectral types of primary stars (G2, G8, K0, K5, M1, and M3) in combination with the eight spectral types as contaminants – the same six used as target stars plus an F2 (HD 20852) and an F5 (HD 103774) star. For each spectral type of primary stars we considered contaminants with magnitudes mv between 5 and 15 (in steps of one). The contaminants considered were those described in Table 5.
Although the Besançon model includes oxygen and carbon AGB (asymptotic giant branch) stars and white dwarfs in the search, we only considered mainsequence (MS) stars. Very metalpoor stars were also excluded from our study. For an M1 target star a K0 star (HD 69680) was used instead of the K1 mentioned above. This was because the barycentric Earth radial velocity (BERV) value form the K1 star did not allow the desired shift in RV. For each targetcontaminant pair we considered the differences between its RV, ΔRV, under 20 km s^{1}, which is half the width of the CCF window. Although giant stars will often be contaminant stars, we assumed that spectra from MS stars are similar to those of giants and used only spectra of MS stars in our simulations.
5. Results
5.1. Real binaries
The results for the contamination by the secondary star of a binary with a primary star of spectral type G2 as a function of ΔRV can be found in Fig. 3. Obviously, the impact on the RV calculation is a function of the difference between target and contaminant RV (ΔRV). One can interpret a CCF as an “average” line of a spectrum, that is fitted by a Gaussian curve to measure the center of the CCF. In the presence of a second star, the CCF is composed of two curves. For ΔRV = 0 the two curves fully overlap, and so the impact on the Gaussian fit and on the RV calculation is minimum. As ΔRV increases, the impact on the Gaussian fit increases until the point when the two CCF curves overlap, with the contaminant RV, , close to 0.6 times the FWHM of the target CCF. When the CCF curves become distinct, the impact on the measured RV of the primary decreases. For ΔRV > 20 km s^{1} the peak of the contaminant CCF curve exits the CCF window that is usually computed with a value of 20 km s^{1}, and for values ΔRV ≥ 25 km s^{1} the contaminant CCF curve completely exits the target CCF window. Nevertheless, the contamination is not null. There are bumps in the wings that slightly contaminate the target spectra.
Fig. 3 Impact on the RV of a G2 target star caused by a companion of spectral type G2, G8, K1, K5, M1, and M3 (left to right, top to bottom). For each case a closeup with a bump for the impact for 10 < ΔRV < 24 km s^{1} is shown. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 4 Maximum contamination of a G2 target star caused by each companion spectral type in m/s. 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 4 shows the maximum contamination for each type of contaminant. As we can see, as the secondary stars become fainter and of later spectral type, the maximum contamination decreases.
5.2. Contamination by the sky
The sky brightness is not zero and its light results from the reflection and scattering of Sun spectra. The sky brightness has a magnitude per arcsec^{2} in V band of 21.8 on a newmoon night, and of 20.0 on a fullmoon night. To study the impact of this contamination we assumed that sky spectrum is the solar one. This is equivalent to say that for a fiber of 0.5′′ radius, we have a systematic contamination of a G2 star with m_{V} ~ 20 on a fullmoon night to a limit of a G2 star with m_{V} ~ 22 (new moon).
The results of the maximum contamination by the sky brightness study are shown in Fig. 5. We can see that when observing a G2, G8, K0, or a K5 target star fainter that m_{V} = 11, or M1, M3 fainter that m_{V} = 14, the errors induced on the observed RV can be larger than 10 cm s^{1}, which can be a problem for future instruments such as ESPRESSO. For a night of observation with a full moon, induced errors become larger than 10 cm s^{1} for G and K target stars fainter that m_{V} = 9 and for an M star fainter than m_{V} = 12.
5.3. Fortuitous alignment
In this section we present a more exhaustive study of all possible sources of stellar contamination. Beyond the moon as a contaminator, there is a vast range of possible contaminators, as was discussed in Sect. 2.2. Our study is simplified because our analysis holds for similar spectra with different magnitude for target and contaminant star, but with same difference between them (Δm = m_{c} − m_{t}), as we can see in Fig. 6. This way, we only carried out our study on the impact for a target star in which m_{v} differs Δm from the contaminant star. The result of our study for contamination as a function of spectral type is shown in Fig. 7.
We first note that there is a clearly defined relation between Δm and the maximum of the contamination, except for some cases where the difference in magnitude between target and contaminant is null. A misidentification of the companion correlation peak with that of the primary may happen due to a (slightly) larger contrast. If we take only Δm > 1, we can describe the relation between Δm and the maximum of the contamination as (1)where a and b are the coefficients presented in Table 7. In this table we also present the value for the root mean square (rms) for each fit. By comparing the panels of Fig. 7 we can also see that the contamination depends not only on Δm, but also on the targetcontaminant spectral type combination. This becomes more evident in Fig. 8. This figure shows the maximum contamination as a function of the contaminant spectral type for a G2 and M3 target star with Δm = 10. We find two reasons for this behavior. First, less contamination occurs with increasingly different spectra. Also, the contamination will depend on the depth of spectral line. Thus, for similar spectra, cooler stars will cause a higher contamination, because their spectral lines depth is higher.
5.4. Statistical analysis of the contamination
After calculating the impact caused by a contaminant star in the RV calculation, it is important to known how often this occurs. Therefore we calculated the probability of measuring the target RV with a given contamination.
In the previous two subsections (Sects. 5.1 and 5.3) we presented a study for the impact to have a contaminant star within the fiber on the RV calculations, assuming that the fiber was well centered on target and contaminant. Although this is a relevant study, the most probable scenario for real observations is that of a contaminant star that not centered in the fiber. In this case, we cannot consider that both target and contaminant fluxes will completely enter the fiber, and therefore we calculated how much of each flux enters the fiber. The fraction of binary and fortuitous alignments and their properties also follows established probability laws. To take these parameters into account in a realistic way, we ran Monte Carlo simulations with 10 000 trials, to calculate the distribution function of the impact of the presence of a contaminant star on the RV calculation. Once again, we had to consider both cases of contamination: binaries and fortuitous alignment. If in our simulations one star was in a binary system and had a background/foreground at the same time, we only considered the stronger RV effect. In these simulations we did not take into account the contamination by the sky brightness either, and also just considered that only ΔRV ≤ 20 km s^{1} will produce a significant impact. We ran the simulations for each case of spectral type target considered in previous sections, at a distance d = 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 [pc] from Earth.
Before presenting our results of the statistical analysis we describe in more detail the considerations to statistically analyze the real binaries (Sect. 5.4.1) and fortuitous alignments (Sect. 5.4.2).
Fig. 5 Maximum contamination of the sky brightness on a a) G2, b) G8, c) K0, d) K5, e) M1, and f) M3 target star spectra. The blue triangles show the impact on the RV caused by the sky brightness on a fullmoon night, while black diamonds show the impact on a newmoon night. 

Open with DEXTER 
5.4.1. Statistical analysis of binaries
For our statistical analysis of contamination in binary systems, we considered the mass ratio distributions, q, mentioned in Sect. 2.1. We used Table 1 based on the study of Duquennoy & Mayor (1991) for target stars of spectral types G and K, and Table 3 based on the study of Janson et al. (2012) for target stars of spectral type M. Because we had M1 and M3 spectra for M stars, we used the M1 spectra for [M0, M4[ stars, and for the later types we used the M3 spectrum. From the work of Duquennoy & Mayor (1991) and Janson et al. (2012) we also used the probability density function for the orbital period and for the eccentricities (see Table 2) for G dwarfs, and the probability density function for the semimajor axis for Mdwarfs (see Table 4). The projected distance R and the ΔRV were drawn performing a Monte Carlo simulation of Kepler’s laws and its projection, considering a uniformly random mean anomaly (M ∈ [0,2π] ), inclination (cosi ∈ [− 1,1] ), longitude of the node (Ω ∈ [0,2π] ), and argument of the periapsis (ω ∈ [0,2π] ).
To compute the luminosity of the stellar companion given the mass of the star, we used relation 2 from Duric (2003): (2)
5.4.2. Statistical analysis of fortuitous alignments
For the fortuitous alignment we are only interested in contaminant stars whose flux can enter the fiber. With a seeing of 0.93, which is the mean value for the La Silla observatory, we measured that the fraction of flux that enters the fiber of a star at 2.6 arcsec from the fiber center is 2 × 10^{8}. If target and contaminant star have the same magnitude, this corresponds to an effective Δm of 19 within the fiber, and so its impact on the target RV can be considered null for our purpose. We then created a probability density function to have a contaminant star of a certain spectral type and magnitude within a radius of up to 2.6 arcsec around the target star, using the density tables from Appendix A.
For background/foreground stars within the 2.6 arcsec radius we assumed a uniform distribution, and if a contaminant is present, the probability that the star is standing at a distance r from the target is proportional to r^{2}, and the probability to have the fortuitous contaminant star between r and r + dr is given by Eq. (3): (3)in which the members are selfexplanatory.
To calculate ΔRV we used the probability density function for the systemic RV, which was computed by fitting a Gaussian to the systemic velocity of stars from HARPS. This yielded an average and a dispersion of (μ,σ) = (7.87,29.87).
5.4.3. Statistical analysis results
The probability to have a given impact on the RV calculation for each case is presented in Fig. 9. We can see that the most probable scenario is to have a contamination of less than 10 cm s^{1}. But contamination may happen and is more probable for faraway target stars, either because they become fainter, or because, in the case of a binary star, it is more probable that the companion star flux enters the fiber. We can examine the target star G8, for instance. In this case, if the target star is 100 pc away, there is only a probability of 67% for a contamination below 10 cm s^{1}, and 14% probability for a contamination between 10 and 100 m/s. There is a peak around a contamination of 10^{3} cm s^{1}, which is, very probably, caused by physical binary contamination. This level of contamination needs to be taken into account when choosing targets for planet searches. This becomes even more important when choosing target stars to be observed with ESPRESSO.
Fig. 6 Contour plot of the maximum induced RV shift in the target RVC_{t} depending on the target (m_{t}) and contaminant (m_{c}) magnitudes. 

Open with DEXTER 
6. Discussion
We showed that we should not neglect the possibility that a stellar companion contaminates the RV calculations. This is specially true for faraway stars, which have a higher probability to have two stars within the fiber. Nevertheless, we stress some assumptions we made that may have some impact on our work. Because spectra with high SN are scarce for lateM stars, in our statistical analysis we used the M1 spectra to represent the [M0, M5[ bin and the M3 spectra for the [M5, M9]. We also assumed that the star will have at most one stellar companion, because we found that the probability to have two contaminant stars is too low. We also did not take into account the effect of the sky brightness if there was no stellar companion.
We also stress that the Besançon model is a probabilistic model, and thus is not free of errors. We consider it reasonable that the distribution of fortuitous alignments is a Poisson distribution of stars. Thus, the associated error is equal to , where N is the number of stars per area element.
The results presented in Fig. 7 may lead one to think that contamination may be stronger than it actually is, but we should not forget that this figure only shows the maximum impact of contamination as a function of Δm, which occurs when RV(contaminant) ~ 0.6 × FWHM(target). We also considered that both stars are wellcentered in the fiber and that all flux enters the fiber. This justifies our statistical analysis for the impact of the stellar companion within the fiber. With our statistical analysis we are able to conclude that it is important to take into account the possibility of contamination by a stellar companion within the fiber, especially when the RV precision enters the domain of the cm s^{1}. Although the probability to have a contamination lower than 10 cm s^{1} is above 50% for every target star considered, we should pay special attention to faraway target stars, for which the impact of contamination can be higher than 10 cm s^{1} for 30−40% of the cases.
6.1. Impact on typical cases
As a consequence of the results presented in Fig. 7, we present in Table 8 a study on the limit Δm for which the maximum impact on the RV calculation is higher than 10 cm s^{1}, 1, 10, and 100 m/s. From this table we can see that for a G star with a contaminant M star, an impact higher than 100 m/s only occurs if Δm < 2. However, in Table 5 from Sect. 2.2 we have seen that the probability to have a contaminant M star of m_{v} < 17 is very low. Thus, if we are only interested in target stars brighter than m_{v} = 15, an impact higher than 100 m/s is very unlikely. We can also see that when observing an M star, an F star can never cause an impact higher than 100 m/s, and an impact of tens m/s is only possible if target and contaminant have almost the same magnitude (Δm ≲ 1.5). On the other hand, even for actual precisions, we may reach a potentially detectable contamination due to a Δm = 9. In many cases the induced effect is not detectable because it is a constant effect. Nevertheless, there are conditions (variable seeing, centering and/or pointing problems, etc.) in which the induced effect will not be constant. Even so, a very particular configuration is necessary (and is highly unlikely) for the effect to create a periodic signal. A contamination stronger than 1 m/s on the RV calculation of a K0 target star is possible if Δm < 9. If the K0 star is at 10 pc, it will have a m_{v} ~ 6, which means that contaminant stars with 6 ≤ v ≤ 15 can cause such a contamination. The probability to have one contaminant star with 6 ≤ m_{v} ≤ 15 within the 0.5′′ radius fiber is 0.02% only.
Fig. 7 Maximum impact of Δm on the RVC_{t} for a target star of spectral type a) G2, b) G8, c) K0, d) K5, e) M1, and f) M3, and contaminants of spectral types F2 (star), F5 (hexagon), G2 (squares), G8 (diamonds), K1 (circles), K5 (triangles), M1 (× crosses), and M3 (+ crosses). 

Open with DEXTER 
Coefficients a an b for each fitting of the relation between Δm and the maximum impact on the RV calculations: , and rms resulting from each combination of target spctral type (TST) and contaminant spectral type (CST).
These tabled effects correspond to the maximum case, i.e., to the difference between contamination and no contamination. Discussed cases are extreme in the sense that they are contamination and no contamination. Nevertheless, to extensively analyze a variable contamination impact we would need to perform many hypotheses with uncertain parameters, such as seeing or flux counts.
Limit Δm for which the maximum impact (I_{max}) on the target RV is higher than 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 m/s, for each combination of target spctral type (TST) and contaminant spectral type (CST).
6.1.1. Sky brightness
In our analysis of the sky brightness impact we assumed that sky brightness is mainly caused by the moon, and so its spectra will be that of a star with spectral type G2. The newmoon sky brightness should then be considered as a lower limit for the contamination from the sky brightness with a G2 spectrum. However, we should not forget that sky brightness has other sources and may depend on the sky zone. Sky spectra from the Galactic disk are surely different from the Galactic halo. Moreover, there is also the possibility to have a galaxy as contaminant, which was not considered. Nevertheless, we consider it a good approximation, or at least a good starting point, to treat the sky brightness as a G2 star.
If observations are carried out on a night with moon, and if cirrus are present, the contamination by the moon will be enhanced.
Tripathi et al. (2010), reported two outlier RV data points caused by cirrus during their observations of WASP3, an F7 star of m_{v} = 10.7, on a fullmoon night. Their RV measurements present a redshift of 140 m/s and of 49 m/s with respect to their bestfitting models. If we assume that cirrus will reflect some of the moonlight, we have a G2 contaminant. The maximum value considered for all practical effects for the visual magnitude of this contaminant will be that of the target star (if it were higher than the target magnitude, the target star would be no longer visible). Thus, for a G2 target star with m_{v} = 10.7 and a contaminant with the same spectral type and magnitude, the maximum contamination will be 2.7 km s^{1}. This corresponds to 0.15% of the moonlight flux, considering that 100% of the moonlight flux corresponds to a star of magnitude 3.65. If 0.01% of the moonlight reaches the fiber, corresponding to a contaminant of spectral type G2 with m_{v} = 13.7, the contamination would be 140 m/s. For a contamination of 49 m/s, 0.003% of the moonlight flux would be enough, corresponding to a G2 contaminant with m_{v} = 14.8. Because the Tripathi et al. (2010) data were taken with the High Resolution Échelle Spectrometer (HIRES) on the Keck I telescope, and we used HARPS spectra in our simulation, and also because we did not calculate the impact for a target of spectral type F, these contamination values are presented here just as a reference, since we cannot directly compare them. Nevertheless, we consider that their hypothesis of cirrus contamination is valid.
The sky brightness contamination is not easily removed. Although its signal may be strong enough to contaminate the RV calculations, it will be too weak to be adequately characterized, fitted, and removed, even for a longslit spectrograph.
Fig. 8 Maximum contamination as a function of the contaminant spectral type for a G2 (blue dots) and M3 (green diamonds) target star with Δm = 10. 

Open with DEXTER 
6.1.2. Kepler stars
Our work can also be a valuable asset for the followup of programs such as Kepler. Kepler stars have 11 ≲ m_{v} ≲ 18 (see Batalha et al. 2012), and consequently, measuring the RV becomes challenging. Beyond the problem of these being faint stars, there is also the problem of the falsepositive planet transit. As an example, we consider the case of Kepler14b (Buchhave et al. 2011), a planet orbiting an F star with a companion star of nearly the same magnitude and only 0.3 arcesec of skyprojected angular separation. Buchhave and collaborators were not able to detect a second peak on the CCF and concluded that the two stars probably have nearly the same RV. They computed an impact of 280 m/s on the RV caused by the companion star. A direct comparison with their work is not possible, because their observations were carried out with the Fiberfed Échelle Spectrograph (FIES) at the 2.5 m NOT at La Palma, and with the HIRES mounted on the Keck I on Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Moreover, our simulation only contemplates target stars of spectral GKM, and this is an F star. Still, performing a rough comparison, we see that our simulations indicate an impact of ~276 m/s for a G2 target star with a contaminant of the same spectral type, Δm = 1, and ΔRV = 1.
Fig. 9 Closeup of the distribution of the expected contamination, , on the radial velocity, RVC_{t}, of a target star of spectral type a) G2, b) G8, c) K0, d) K5, e) M1, and f) M3, and at distance d, caused by a background or a companion star. The green thick solid line shows the distribution if the target star stands at a distance of d = 1 pc, the blue dotted line for d = 5 pc, black dashed line for d = 10 pc, magenta dashdotted line for d = 50 pc, and red solid line for 100 pc. Numbers in each bin correspond to the impact probability for each target distance: the number in the top corresponds to 1 pc and the number in the bottom to 100 pc. 

Open with DEXTER 
7. Conclusions
This study on the impact of stellar companions within the fiber of RV calculations allows us to conclude that we should not neglect the possibility of contaminant flux from stellar companions stars, specially if we are observing faraway stars. On average, if we are observing a G or a K star, the contamination may be higher than 10 cm s^{1} if the difference between target and contaminant magnitude is Δm < 10, and higher than 1 m/s if Δm < 8. If the target star is a star of spectral type M, a Δm < 8 is enough to obtain the same contamination of 10 cm s^{1}, and a contamination may be higher than 1 m/s if Δm < 6. We also showed that sky brightness should not be discarded, particularly on fullmoon nights, if one observes faint target stars (m_{v} > 10).
These results will allow us to more wisely choose target stars to be observed with instruments such as ESPRESSO and CODEX, and they provide reference values for the different cases of contamination possible in fiberfed highresolution spectrographs. We also stress that there are diagnosis methods that should be capable of detecting most of the blends that mimick planets. We can detect a blend through bisector analysis of the CCF or from correlations using different templates (Santos et al. 2002).
Appendix A: Density of stars
Fig. A.1 Number of stars in each bin of spectral type and magnitude for an area of the sky with a radius of 3°. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. A.2 Density of stars in each bin of spectral type and magnitude for an area of the sky with a radius of 0.5 arcsec. 

Open with DEXTER 
Appendix B: Method details
To control the magnitude of the contaminant star we first used the relation (B.1) to calculate m_{v} in the target reference frame,
(B.1)where F_{t} and F_{c} are the fluxes of the target and of the contaminant. The magnitudes are now calibrated and can be changed by multiplying the flux by a factor of
(B.2)where x is the difference between the new chosen magnitude and the true magnitude of the star in the targetstar system.
To change the RV of the contaminant spectra we also had to modify them. The first challenge when processing our coadded spectra with the HARPS RV pipeline is that it will take into account the header (and proprieties) of the parent spectra. To compensate for this we first need to replace the header of the contaminant spectrum file with that from the target, and then run the cross correlation function (CCF) recipe of the RV pipeline. The next step in this process was to shift the contaminant spectra. To
assess by how much the contaminant spectra had to be shifted, we used Eq. (B.3) (B.3)where λ_{c} are the new wavelengths to derive the desired ΔRV (difference between the RV of the target and the contaminant), λ_{t} are the wavelengths from the wave file corresponding to the target, and c is the light speed in vacuum. These new wavelengths were used to calculate, by linear interpolation, the number of pixels by which the contaminant needed to be shifted. This gives a new xx axis that it was used, recurring to another linear interpolation, to shift the contaminant spectra. With the target RV for the contaminant, the next step is the sum of the target with the modified contaminant spectra, which is the sum of their fluxes. The shift of the contaminant spectra should not be larger that the maximum barycentric Earth radial velocity (BERVMX) of the star, otherwise there is the risk that the spectral lines enter and leave the orders when performing the CCF calculation. BERVMX defines the excluded spectral lines from the correlation due to the orbital movement of the Earth toward the star. Our goal is to introduce a shift equivalent to a BERV value lower than the BERVMX, so that we do not need to exclude new lines.
http://exoplanet.eu/, as of 27/09/2012
Acknowledgments
This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. D.C., P.F., N.C.S., and G.B. acknowledge the support from the European Research Council/European Community under the FP7 through Starting Grant agreement number 239953, as well as from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal, in the form of grant reference PTDC/CTEAST/098528/2008. We also thank J.S. Amaral for a critical reading of the manuscipt.
References
 Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2012, ApJS, submitted [arXiv:1202.5852] [Google Scholar]
 Buchhave, L. A., Latham, D. W., Carter, J. A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 3 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Cegla, H. M., Watson, C. A., Marsh, T. R., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, L54 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Dumusque, X., Santos, N. C., Udry, S., Lovis, C., & Bonfils, X. 2011a, A&A, 527, A82 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Dumusque, X., Udry, S., Lovis, C., Santos, N. C., & Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G. 2011b, A&A, 525, A140 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Duquennoy, A., & Mayor, M. 1991, A&A, 248, 485 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Duric, N. 2003, Advanced Astrophysics (UK: Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
 Figueira, P., Marmier, M., Bonfils, X., et al. 2010, A&A, 513, L8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Huélamo, N., Figueira, P., Bonfils, X., et al. 2008, A&A, 489, L9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Janson, M., Hormuth, F., Bergfors, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Mayor, M., Marmier, M., Lovis, C., et al. 2011, A&A, submitted [arXiv:1109.2497] [Google Scholar]
 Melo, C., Santos, N. C., Gieren, W., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 721 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Pepe, F. A., Cristiani, S., Rebolo Lopez, R., et al. 2010, in SPIE Conf. Ser., 7735 [Google Scholar]
 Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., et al. 2001, A&A, 379, 279 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Robin, A. C., Reylé, C., Derrière, S., & Picaud, S. 2003, A&A, 409, 523 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Santos, N. C., Mayor, M., Naef, D., et al. 2002, A&A, 392, 215 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Tripathi, A., Winn, J. N., Johnson, J. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 715, 421 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Online material
All Tables
Probability of observing a binary with a mass ratio q = M_{2}/M_{1} among Gdwarf binaries for periods P < 10^{4} days and P < 10^{4}.
Probability of observing a binary with an eccentricity e among Gdwarfs binaries for periods P < 10^{3} days and P < 10^{3}.
Stars used in our simulations, their spectral type, visual magnitude (m_{v}) and S/N at the center of the spectral order 50 (SN50).
Coefficients a an b for each fitting of the relation between Δm and the maximum impact on the RV calculations: , and rms resulting from each combination of target spctral type (TST) and contaminant spectral type (CST).
Limit Δm for which the maximum impact (I_{max}) on the target RV is higher than 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 m/s, for each combination of target spctral type (TST) and contaminant spectral type (CST).
All Figures
Fig. 1 Number of stars in each bin of spectral type and magnitude (radius of 3°). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 2 Shift of a G2 target RV caused by a contaminant of the same spectral type and magnitude, m_{v}, in function of the difference between individual radial velocities. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 3 Impact on the RV of a G2 target star caused by a companion of spectral type G2, G8, K1, K5, M1, and M3 (left to right, top to bottom). For each case a closeup with a bump for the impact for 10 < ΔRV < 24 km s^{1} is shown. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 4 Maximum contamination of a G2 target star caused by each companion spectral type in m/s. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 5 Maximum contamination of the sky brightness on a a) G2, b) G8, c) K0, d) K5, e) M1, and f) M3 target star spectra. The blue triangles show the impact on the RV caused by the sky brightness on a fullmoon night, while black diamonds show the impact on a newmoon night. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 6 Contour plot of the maximum induced RV shift in the target RVC_{t} depending on the target (m_{t}) and contaminant (m_{c}) magnitudes. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 7 Maximum impact of Δm on the RVC_{t} for a target star of spectral type a) G2, b) G8, c) K0, d) K5, e) M1, and f) M3, and contaminants of spectral types F2 (star), F5 (hexagon), G2 (squares), G8 (diamonds), K1 (circles), K5 (triangles), M1 (× crosses), and M3 (+ crosses). 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 8 Maximum contamination as a function of the contaminant spectral type for a G2 (blue dots) and M3 (green diamonds) target star with Δm = 10. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 9 Closeup of the distribution of the expected contamination, , on the radial velocity, RVC_{t}, of a target star of spectral type a) G2, b) G8, c) K0, d) K5, e) M1, and f) M3, and at distance d, caused by a background or a companion star. The green thick solid line shows the distribution if the target star stands at a distance of d = 1 pc, the blue dotted line for d = 5 pc, black dashed line for d = 10 pc, magenta dashdotted line for d = 50 pc, and red solid line for 100 pc. Numbers in each bin correspond to the impact probability for each target distance: the number in the top corresponds to 1 pc and the number in the bottom to 100 pc. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. A.1 Number of stars in each bin of spectral type and magnitude for an area of the sky with a radius of 3°. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. A.2 Density of stars in each bin of spectral type and magnitude for an area of the sky with a radius of 0.5 arcsec. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.