Microlensing of the broad line region in 17 lensed quasars

Home

All issues

Volume 544 (August 2012)

A&A, 544 (2012) A62

Full HTML

Free Access

Table 5

Comparison of M from this paper (Col. #3) with values derived in the literature (Col. #4).

Object	F₁/F₂	M(this work)	M_w(literature)	Filter/line

(a) 0047	A/B	0.220 ± 0.05	0.240 ± 0.020	C III]¹
			0.253 ± 0.002	H-band⁹
(b) 0142	A/B	0.131 ± 0.003	0.121 ± 0.004	H-band¹¹
			0.128 ± 0.004	K-band¹¹
			0.132 ± 0.060	L′-band²
(c) 0246	A/B	0.340 ± 0.010	0.302 ± 0.062	H-band¹²
			0.258 ± 0.015	K-band²
			0.290 ± 0.019	K′-band^12,†
			0.331 ± 0.016	L′-band²
(d) 0435	B/D	1.470 ± 0.050	1.270 ± 0.016	H-band⁸
			1.493 ± 0.120	K-band²
			1.270 ± 0.040	K-band¹⁶
			1.220 ± 0.170	L′-band²
(e) 0806	A/B	0.420 ± 0.040	0.474 ± 0.035	H-band¹³
			0.406 ± 0.030	K-band²
			< 0.164	L′-band²
(f) 0951	A/B	0.230 ± 0.020	0.285 ± 0.005	H-band¹⁴
			0.214 ± 0.042	8.4 Ghz^4,‡
(g) 0952	A/B	0.440 ± 0.040	0.283 ± 0.03	H-band⁸
(h) 1138	C/B	1.100 ± 0.050	1.191 ± 0.015	H-band⁹
			1.367 ± 0.135	Ks-band¹⁶
(i) 1226	A-B	0.850 ± 0.050	0.499 ± 0.006	H-band⁹
(j) 1335	A/B	0.230 ± 0.020	0.299 ± 0.008	H-band⁸
			0.409 ± 0.027	K-band^5,†
(k) 1355	A/B	0.340 ± 0.030	0.258 ± 0.08	H-band⁸
			0.299 ± 0.019	K-band^6,†
(l) 2033	B/C	0.900 ± 0.020	0.904 ± 0.025	H-band⁷
			0.912 ± 0.050	Ks-band¹⁶
(m) 2149	A/B	0.245 ± 0.002	0.245 ± 0.005	C III]¹⁵
			0.234 ± 0.001	H-band¹⁰
(n) 0924	A/B	0.38 ± 0.01	0.44 ± 0.04	H-band¹⁷
(o) 1131	B/A	2.15 ± 0.05	1.294 ± 0.156	H-band¹⁸
			1.430 ± 0.026	K-band¹⁸
	C/B	1.30 ± 0.07	0.449 ± 0.079	H-band¹⁸
			0.570 ± 0.026	K-band¹⁸
(p) 1413	AB/D	0.425 ± 0.015	0.579 ± 0.005	H-band²⁰
			0.430 ± 0.060	11.2 μm²¹
(r) 2237	A/D	1.0 ± 0.200	0.410 ± 0.010	H-band¹⁹
			0.87 ± 0.05	11.67 μm¹⁹

Notes. The object name (Col. #1) has been shortened to the first 4 digits of the RA. The last column indicates the filter/line for which the literature measurement has been performed. See Sect. 4.4 for discussion.

^(†)

We assumed 0.05 mag on the photometry of the individual images,

^(‡)

we arbitrarily assumed 20% uncertainty on the flux ratio.

References.

⁽¹⁾

Wisotzki et al. (2004);

⁽²⁾

Fadely & Keeton (2011);

⁽³⁾

Courbin et al. (2011);

⁽⁴⁾

Schechter et al. (1998);

⁽⁵⁾

Oguri et al. (2004);

⁽⁶⁾

Morgan et al. (2004);

⁽⁷⁾

Vuissoz et al. (2008);

⁽⁸⁾

CASTLES;

⁽⁹⁾

Chantry et al. (2010);

⁽¹⁰⁾

Sluse et al. (2012);

⁽¹¹⁾

Lehár et al. (2000);

⁽¹²⁾

Inada et al. (2005);

⁽¹³⁾

Sluse et al. (2008b);

⁽¹⁴⁾

Falco et al. (1999);

⁽¹⁵⁾

Burud et al. (2002);

⁽¹⁶⁾

Blackburne et al. (2011);

⁽¹⁷⁾

Eigenbrod et al. (2006a);

⁽¹⁸⁾

Sluse et al. (2006);

⁽¹⁹⁾

Falco et al. (1996);

⁽²⁰⁾

Chantry & Magain (2007);

⁽²¹⁾

MacLeod et al. (2009).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.