Free Access
Volume 535, November 2011
Article Number A125
Number of page(s) 6
Section Interstellar and circumstellar matter
Published online 30 November 2011

© ESO, 2011

1. Introduction

FU Orionis-type objects, or FUors, constitute a small group of young stars characterized by large outbursts in visible light, attributed to highly enhanced accretion (Hartmann & Kenyon 1996). During these outbursts, accretion rates from the circumstellar disk to the star are on the order of 10-4M/yr, three orders of magnitude higher than in quiescence. Enhanced accretion is often accompanied by enhanced mass loss, because most FUors have optical jets, molecular outflows, and optically visible ring-like structures that are sometimes explained by expanding shells thrown off during previous outbursts.

During a single, century-long outburst, as much as 0.01 M of the material can be dumped onto the stellar surface. Thus, the inner disk needs to be replenished after each outburst, possibly by material from the infalling envelope. Recent theoretical studies show that the continuous infall from the envelope is also needed to trigger the outbursts (Vorobyov & Basu 2006). After many outbursts, the envelope vanishes, and the object finally enters a state of permanently low accretion. This general paradigm of the evolution of young, low-mass stars was invoked by Quanz et al. (2007) to explain the observed diversity of FUors: while some objects are still deeply embedded (e.g. L1551 IRS 5, V1735 Cyg), others have already cleared away part of their envelopes (e.g. V1057 Cyg, V1515 Cyg). Statistics show that probably all low-mass young stars undergo FUor-like phases during their evolution, implying that FUors might be the clue objects that can lead to understanding envelope evolution and dispersal.

Interferometric observations of molecular line emission have been successfully used to probe the small-scale structure of molecular material around young stellar objects (YSOs). For example, for a sample of low-mass YSOs in Taurus (Hogerheijde et al. 1998), Serpens (Hogerheijde et al. 1999), and Ophiuchus (van Kempen et al. 2009), it was found that most YSOs are surrounded by compact envelopes of up to a few thousand AU in radius, which are well traced by 13CO and C18O. Condensations, inhomogeneities in the envelopes can be seen in HCO+ and 13CO. The HCO+ and HCN molecules trace the walls of the outflow, while SiO and SO emission originates in shocked material in the outflow. These observations provided detailed kinematical picture of the envelopes (for molecular studies of some individual YSOs, see e.g. Jørgensen et al. 2004; Matthews et al. 2006; Brinch et al. 2009).

Despite being “accretion laboratories”, there are relatively few molecular gas observations published for FUors. Single-dish observations often show strong CO emission towards FUors, and line profiles sometimes indicate molecular outflows (e.g. Hartmann & Kenyon 1996, and references therein). However, due to the large single-dish beam, it is not possible to study the spatial distribution of the emission using these data. Out of the nine FUors listed in Hartmann & Kenyon (1996), millimeter interferometric observations are only available for L1551 IRS 5 (e.g. Momose et al. 1998).

In this paper, we present interferometric observations of the molecular emission from four FUor-type objects in Cygnus: V1057 Cyg, V1331 Cyg, V1515 Cyg, and V1735 Cyg. With the exception of V1331 Cyg (Levreault 1988; McMuldroch et al. 1993), these data represent the first millimeter interferometric observations for our targets. We use the 13CO(1–0) line emission to perform a high spatial and spectral resolution study of the gaseous material around FUors. We analyze the spatial and kinematic structure of the 13CO gas, and check whether the emission can be associated with the circumstellar envelopes. Our results can be compared with those obtained for normal YSOs. Such a comparison may also contribute to the ongoing debate over whether all young stars undergo an eruptive phase in their early evolution or FUors are atypical objects.

2. Observations

We reduced unpublished 13CO observations of our targets obtained with the Plateau de Bure Interferometer (PdBI) on May 30 and 31, 1993 (program ID: C057, PI: Fiebig). The observations were carried out in snapshot mode (about 1 h of on-source correlation time per object), using four antennas (4D1 configuration), and the baselines ranged from 24 to 64 m. The receiver was tuned to the 13CO(1–0) line at 110.2 GHz (lower sideband), the channel spacing was 78 kHz (0.21 km s-1). At this wavelength, the single-dish HPBW is 45′′. Bright quasars (3C454.3, 2005+403, 2037+511, 2200+420, 0648–165, and 0727–115) were observed to enable RF bandpass, phase, and amplitude calibration. The phase center was 20h58m537 +44°15′279 for V1057 Cyg, 21h01m093 +50°21′422 for V1331 Cyg, 20h23m479 +42°12′248 for V1515 Cyg, and 21h47m207 +47°32′041 for V1735 Cyg.

Data reduction was done in the standard way with CLIC, a GILDAS-based application written especially for reducing PdBI data1. The rms phase noise was less than 18° for all observations. We estimate a flux calibration accuracy of  ≈15%. MAPPING was used to create naturally weighted dirty maps in an area of 64″ × 64″, which were then deconvolved using the Clark CLEAN method. The synthesized beam is approximately 7″ × 6″, while the rms noise in the channel maps is  ≈0.15 Jy/beam. For the exact beam parameters, see the log of observations in Table 1.

3. Results

The 13CO(1–0) spectra of our sources, integrated over the whole 64″ × 64″ maps, are plotted in Fig. 1. Strong 13CO(1–0) emission was detected towards all sources with high signal-to-noise ratio. In all cases, we found an emission line coinciding with the systemic velocity of each source (from optical and near-IR spectra, Herbig 1977, Kenyon & Hartmann 1989, and Chavarría et al. 1979 determined heliocentric radial velocities of −14    ±    2, −15    ±    2, −12    ±    2, and −10    ±    2 km s-1, corresponding to LSR velocities of 1.9, 0.6, 5.2, and 3.9 km s-1 for V1057 Cyg, V1331 Cyg, V1515 Cyg, and V1735 Cyg, respectively). We collapsed a few channels centered on the peak emission, calculated visibility amplitudes as a function of uv radius (Fig. 2), and produced velocity-integrated maps (Fig. 3). The LSR velocities where the emission peaks are listed in Table 1. Velocity-integrated line fluxes calculated for the emission areas visible in Fig. 3 are also listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Summary of PdBI observations.

3.1. Line profiles

The line profile of V1057 Cyg is the broadest in our sample (FWHM ≈ 2.1 km s-1), and is centered at 4.6 km s-1. This is consistent with the velocity seen in single-dish 12CO(1–0), 12CO(2–1), and 13CO(1–0) data by Bechis & Lo (1975) and Levreault (1988). V1331 Cyg shows a narrow 13CO(1–0) line (FWHM ≈ 0.7 km s-1). McMuldroch et al. (1993) presents Owens Valley interferometric observations of V1331 Cyg in the same line, as well as in other transitions and other isotopes of CO. The velocities of these lines are consistent with ours. V1515 Cyg shows two separate, narrow emission components (FWHM ≈ 0.6 km s-1) at 5.1 km s-1 and at 11.9 km s-1. Both of these components are also visible in single-dish 12CO(3–2) and 13CO(2–1) data from Evans et al. (1994). The spectrum of V1735 Cyg shows a narrow, single-peaked 13CO(1–0) line (FWHM   ≈  0.7 km s-1). The shape and position of this line coincides well with that of the 13CO(2–1) line detected in single-dish data by Evans et al. (1994). The 12CO(2–1) line from the same paper shows self-absorption at this velocity, and broad line wings indicating outflow activity. We plotted position-velocity diagrams along different angles through our sources, but except for V1515 Cyg (which will be discussed later), we found no significant velocity gradients.

thumbnail Fig. 1

13CO(1–0) spectra of our targets obtained with the PdBI. Fluxes were integrated over an area of 64″ × 64″ centered on the phase center.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Visibility amplitudes as a function of uv radius. Data were binned in 1 m-wide bins, and the error bars indicate the dispersion of data points within one bin.

3.2. Spatial extent

In Fig. 2 we plotted the visibility amplitudes as a function of uv radius. Since these are snapshot observations, the uv-space is only partially sampled, with ranges of uv radii where no visibility information is available. However, even with this coarse sampling, the graphs show a decline in amplitude with uv radius, indicating that our sources are spatially resolved. Simple 2D Gaussian fits to the maps presented in Fig. 3 also indicate that our targets are spatially resolved. The peak positions, deconvolved sizes, and PAs of the Gaussian fits are listed in Table 1. Gaussian models fitted to the visibilities give sizes within  ±2″ and PAs within  ±10° to those determined from the Gaussian fits to the images. Thus, we consider these numbers as representative uncertainties of the values given in Table 1. We emphasize that these fits are not physical envelope models, and thus the obtained parameters should be regarded only as rough quantitative estimates of the size of the emitting region.

V1057 Cyg and V1331 Cyg are the most compact sources in our sample, with FWHM of about 10″ × 5″. Moreover, in both cases, the emission in centered precisely on the optical position of the stars. V1515 Cyg shows the most extended emission in our sample. The stellar position seems to be located at the southern tip of a bright, slightly curved, elongated filament, but extended emission can be seen both to the south and to the north of the star (≈20″ across). A map produced for the channels around the emission line at 11.9 km s-1 reveals that this separate velocity component comes from a compact area  ≈13″ to the northwest (PA 330°) of the optical source. The bulk of the emission in the V1735 Cyg region comes from an area with an FWHM of  ≈9″ centered 29 to the northwest with respect to the optical position of the star. Moreover, there is also some tentative extended emission towards the northwest about 14″ from the stellar position.

thumbnail Fig. 3

13CO(1–0) maps of our targets, integrated in the velocity ranges indicated above the images. White asterisks indicate optical positions from SIMBAD. Beam sizes are  ≈6  ×  7″. The noise level is σ = 0.10 Jy km s-1; the solid contours are 2σ, 4σ, 6σ, ...; the dashed contours are 0, −2σ, −4σ.

3.3. Gas masses

Following Scoville et al. (1986), the total H2 mass can be calculated from the observed 13CO(1–0) line fluxes by

where TX is the excitation temperature, τ the optical depth, D the distance of the source, X(13CO) the molecular abundance relative to H2, and the velocity-integrated line flux in units of Jy km s-1. Using TX = 50 K (as determined from dust continuum observations by Sandell & Weintraub 2001), assuming the lines to be optically thin (τ ≪ 1) and taking X(13CO) = 1.6 × 10-6 (Langer & Penzias 1993), the total gas masses are 0.12, 0.06, 0.43, and 0.10 M for V1057 Cyg, V1331 Cyg, V1515 Cyg, and V1735 Cyg, respectively. Of course these numbers should be considered lower limits if the lines are actually optically thick, or if part of the 13CO emission is resolved out by the interferometer. However, these values are in good agreement with total masses derived from single-dish 850   μm dust continuum maps of comparable size by Sandell & Weintraub (2001), which were 0.10, 0.13, 0.15, and 0.42 M for V1057 Cyg, V1331 Cyg, V1515 Cyg, and V1735 Cyg, respectively. This suggests that our interferometric observations probably recover most of the 13CO emission.

3.4. 2.7 mm continuum

Although the main focus of our data analysis is the study of the 13CO emission, the PdBI observations could also be used to look for 2.7 mm continuum emission by excluding channels around the lines and collapsing the remaining channels. The resulting continuum maps have a typical rms noise of 2 mJy/beam. We detected 2.7 mm continuum emission only for one of our targets, V1331 Cyg. This is not surprising because, based on the observations of Sandell & Weintraub (2001), out of our four targets, V1331 Cyg is also the brightest at 1.3 mm and at 850   μm. The 2.7 mm emission we detected is not resolved, its position is consistent with the optical stellar position, and the measured total flux is 12  ±  2 mJy. Assuming optically thin emission, dust opacity of κ1.3   mm = 0.01 cm2 g-1 (Ossenkopf & Henning 1994), an emissivity law of κ ~ λ-1, and dust temperature of 50 K (Sandell & Weintraub 2001), this flux corresponds to a total (gas+dust) mass of 0.19 M, similar to what we obtained from the line flux of V1331 Cyg. Using 6 mJy as a 3σ upper limit for the 2.7 mm continuum flux of the other sources, we can give upper limits of 0.11, 0.32, and 0.26 M for V1057 Cyg, V1515 Cyg, and V1735 Cyg, respectively.

4. Discussion

In the following sections, we discuss what our interferometric 13CO(1–0) data can add to what we already know about the circumstellar environment of our targets based on optical images, sub-millimeter continuum maps, CO line observations, and SED analysis from the literature. We also discuss whether the detected 13CO emission can be associated with the envelopes.

4.1. V1057 Cyg

After its outburst in 1969–70, an eccentric ring-like nebulosity of 1′ × 15 appeared around V1057 Cyg (Herbig 1977). The monitoring of this ring in subsequent years indicated that it is fading together with the central star without any changes in the structure. This implies that the ring is a reflection nebula: a pre-existing structure illuminated by the outbursting star, and not material ejected from the central source by the outburst. From the line wings of single-dish 12CO data, Levreault (1988) and Evans et al. (1994) concluded the presence of a molecular outflow on a similar spatial scale. The surroundings of V1057 Cyg was mapped by Sandell & Weintraub (2001), whose 850   μm continuum image indicates a rather compact, but resolved (≈4″) source coinciding with the star and a fainter, north-south oriented filament.

In our 13CO(1–0) data we do not detect emission either from the ring-like reflection nebula of from the north-south filament. However, our interferometric observations definitely resolve the central source: the deconvolved Gaussian FWHM at the distance of V1057 Cyg corresponds to about 5800 × 3100 AU. The lack of observable line wings, the relatively narrow line profile, and the compact spatial appearance of the emission points to quiescent gas, probably situated in the outer parts of a circumstellar envelope.

The infrared SED of the source (e.g. Ábrahám et al. 2004) suggests a continuous temperature distribution in the system. This supports our conclusion that there is an envelope associated with and heated by the central star. The presence and measured size of the envelope is consistent with the model prediction of 7000 AU proposed by Green et al. (2006). They also suggest that the envelope has a rather large conical cavity, which explains the modest far-infrared excess. The relatively low extinction along the line-of-sight and the detectability of the 10   μm silicate emission feature implies a close to pole-on geometry for the source, in accordance with its relatively symmetric shape in our interferometric observations. The circumstellar mass of 0.12 M derived from our 13CO observations, consistently with the dust mass estimate by Sandell & Weintraub (2001), is rather high, significantly exceeding the typical disk masses of T Tauri-type stars.

4.2. V1331 Cyg

V1331 Cyg is not an FUor in its present state, but – based on the similarity of its spectrum to that of V1057 Cyg prior to maximum light – is probably in a pre-outburst state, or between outbursts (McMuldroch et al. 1993). Single-dish and interferometric 12CO and 13CO observations by Levreault (1988) and McMuldroch et al. (1993) revealed a complex circumstellar environment containing a molecular outflow approximately along the line of sight, a flattened gaseous envelope of about 6000 × 4400 AU in size, and a gaseous expanding ring of about 41 000 × 28 000 AU. The latter coincides well with the large ring-shaped optical reflection nebula seen by Quanz et al. (2007).

Consistently with the similar angular resolution measurements of McMuldroch et al. (1993), our interferometric 13CO observations of V1331 Cyg reveal a rather compact structure towards the star with a deconvolved Gaussian FWHM of about 5300 × 3600 AU at the distance of V1331 Cyg. This core is also visible in continuum emission in the 850   μm maps of Sandell & Weintraub (2001), although it is only marginally resolved (≲6″ or 3300 AU). We suggest that both the 13CO gas emission and the dust thermal emission originates in a circumstellar envelope, probably the same flattened structure that was proposed by McMuldroch et al. (1993) to explain the nature of the 13CO emission. It is probable that the dust in this flattened envelope scatters the stellar light and gives rise to the inner ring observed in optical images by Quanz et al. (2007).

The presence of a circumstellar envelope around V1331 Cyg is also consistent with the SED, which exhibits significant infrared excess indicating substantial amounts of circumstellar material (e.g. Ábrahám et al. 2004). The geometry proposed by McMuldroch et al. (1993) and by Quanz et al. (2007) suggests that we see the inner part of the system through a conical cavity filled with a pole-on molecular outflow. However, we detect 13CO emission neither from the outflow nor from the outer, large expanding ring, in agreement with the interferometric observations of McMuldroch et al. (1993).

4.3. V1515 Cyg

thumbnail Fig. 4

The optical and millimeter environment of V1515 Cyg. The grayscale image in the background is an SDSS r-band image; the gray contours are the same 13CO(1–0) contours as in Fig. 3. White asterisk indicate the optical stellar position.

V1551 Cyg brightened in optical light slowly during the 1940s and 1950s (Herbig 1977). Photographic plates from this time show a bright, narrow arc of nebulosity extending to the north and west of the star. Later images from the 1970s to the present day still show this northern arc, but a brighter nebulosity is also visible to the south and west, together forming a nearly complete circular ring with a diameter of  ≈16″ (corresponding to 16 000 AU, see also the Sloan Digital Sky Survey2r-band image from 2003 in Fig. 4). That the size of this ring did not change significantly for 60 years but the brightness distribution did, suggests that it is a reflection nebula similar in nature to that around V1057 Cyg.

Our 13CO(1–0) measurement shows arc-shaped emission, which, plotted over the optical image in Fig. 4, clearly coincides with the ring-shaped reflection nebula. The similar morphology of the 13CO emission and the scattered light, as well as the matching radial velocities of the 13CO emission and the star suggest that the detected molecular gas is physically associated with the FUor. Similar to V1057 Cyg, the 12CO line profile of V1515 Cyg in Evans et al. (1994) indicates a molecular outflow. Our 13CO(1–0) data, however, show no high-velocity line wings; the emission line is narrow and thus probably traces quiescent, not outflowing material. We detect a small (≲ 0.5 km s-1) velocity difference between the northern and the southern parts of the ring, the southern part being slightly more redshifted. However, the ring is clearly not expanding.

A map of the 850   μm dust continuum from Sandell & Weintraub (2001) shows faint extended emission towards V1515 Cyg and also at about 10″ to the north and northwest of the star. Although these observations were made with a relatively large (15″) beam, the results are not inconsistent with a potentially arc-shaped dust emission. It is thus possible that the ring of material that is responsible for the optical reflection nebula and for the 13CO emission also emits in dust continuum.

Although the observed molecular emission does not exactly peak towards the star, some dust and gas must be located in the vicinity of V1515 Cyg, forming a circumstellar envelope. This claim is suggested by the SED of the FUor, which was modeled with disk+envelope geometry by Turner et al. (1997) and Green et al. (2006). However, this envelope does not show up as a separate localized peak in our 13CO map. We measured the highest gas mass towards this object within our sample, which can probably be explained by the contribution from both the circumstellar envelope and from the arc-shaped feature. Thus the 0.43 M is an upper limit for the envelope mass.

4.4. V1735 Cyg

V1735 Cyg had its outburst some time in the 1950s or the 1960s (Elias 1978). The star is associated with faint patches and filaments of reflected light within 1′. Submillimeter dust continuum observations by Sandell & Weintraub (2001) indicate the presence of two sources: one associated with (albeit slightly offset from the optical position of) V1735 Cyg, and a brighter one located about 20–24″ to the northeast (the deeply embedded Class I protostar V1735 Cyg SM1). Single-dish 12CO and 13CO observations (Levreault 1983; Richardson et al. 1985; Evans et al. 1994) have revealed a complex molecular gas structure in the vicinity of these sources. The 12CO emission is extended on the arcminute spatial scale, and broad line wings indicate outflow activity. Evans et al. (1994) concluded that both V1735 Cyg and SM1 drive molecular outflows.

As for the other three FUors in our sample, our 13CO interferometric observations of V1735 Cyg show narrow emission with no line wings. This again points to quiescent gas in some kind of envelope. Our map shows a compact peak close to V1735 Cyg, but with a definite offset of 29 to the northwest. Based on multifilter optical images, Goodrich (1987) discovered that V1735 Cyg itself is much more reddened than the surrounding reflection nebulosity. He speculates that the reason for this may be a dark cloud in front of V1735 Cyg. In this scenario, the dark cloud may be offset from the star, as long as it causes enough interstellar extinction to explain the observed colors. Based on the fact that the 13CO emission we detect is offset from the stellar position, we propose that a significant part of the emission is coming from this foreground dark cloud. This suggestion is supported by the results of Quanz et al. (2007), who, based on the analysis of midinfrared ice features, conclude that the extinction for V1735 Cyg might be caused by ices somewhere in the line of sight to the source, rather than material related to the young star. The foreground structure, however, may not be completely unrelated to the star because of their identical radial velocities.

For continuum observations such as those presented in Weintraub et al. (1991) and in Sandell & Weintraub (2001), the dominant source is not the FUor, but V1735 Cyg SM1. This source also emits molecular line emission, as shown by the single-dish 12CO(3–2) map presented by Evans et al. (1994). Interestingly, we did not detect V1735 Cyg SM1 in 13CO. The reason for this may be partly that V1735 Cyg SM1 is separated from V1735 Cyg by about 20″, thus it is at the very edge of our primary beam. Additionally, the submillimeter source is very extended, so the interferometer may filter out most of its emission.

5. Summary and conclusions

In this paper, we present interferometric observations of the 13CO(1–0) line of four well known FUors, YSOs characterized by large optical outbursts due to enhanced disk accretion. For V1057 Cyg, V1515 Cyg, and V1735 Cyg, these represent the first millimeter interferometric data published so far. This makes it possible to study the gas distribution on a few thousand AU spatial scale.

Although all of our sources are known to drive molecular outflows, as shown by the high-velocity line wings of 12CO, our data suggest that the 13CO(1–0) emission traces quiescent gas. With the exception of V1515 Cyg, the size of the emitting region is within a few thousand AU, consistent with typical circumstellar envelope sizes. Gas masses calculated from our 13CO line fluxes and from dust continuum data from Sandell & Weintraub (2001) are also consistent. This indicates that the 13CO emission seen towards our sources mostly originates in a relatively compact circumstellar envelope, or, as in the case of V1735 Cyg, possibly in a small foreground cloud.

All of our sources are surrounded by reflection nebulosities, which are probably pre-existing structures illuminated by the brightened central source. With the exception of V1515 Cyg, we detect no 13CO emission from these structures. For V1515 Cyg, the 13CO emission coincides with the ring-shaped optical reflection nebula. This indicates that the source is surrounded by a ring of material that, on one hand, scatters the optical light of the central star, and on the other, emits at millimeter wavelengths. An important consequence is that attributing unresolved, single-dish millimeter fluxes of V1515 Cyg to the circumstellar envelope may not be entirely correct.

Based on the appearance of the 10   μm silicate feature, Quanz et al. (2007) define two categories of FUors. They argue that objects showing the feature in absorption (e.g. V1735 Cyg) are younger and still embedded in a circumstellar envelope. Objects showing the silicate band in emission (e.g. V1057 Cyg, V1331 Cyg, and V1515 Cyg) are more evolved, with a direct view on the surface layer of the accretion disk. However, in case of V1735 Cyg, the millimeter emission and the absorption at shorter wavelengths may be due to a foreground cloud, and consequently the object may be more evolved (less embedded) than it appears. Our 13CO data, especially the case of V1515 Cyg and V1735 Cyg, demonstrate that millimeter emission and consequently absorption at other wavelengths may not be necessarily or exclusively associated with circumstellar envelopes. Thus, large beam, single-dish data alone are probably not enough to obtain a complete picture of the circumstellar environment of FUors. We suggest that any theory of the FUor phenomenon that interprets the geometry of the circumstellar material and its evolution using single-beam measurements must be checked and compared to interferometric observations in the future. Millimeter observations with facilities such as ALMA for both the dust continuum and for the line emission of molecules such as 13CO, C18O, HCO+, and HCN will be a fruitful direction for future studies of FUors.


The author thanks Prof. Wolfgang J. Duschl for making the PdBI data available and Dr. Roberto Neri for his help during the data reduction. Discussions with Dr. Michiel Hogerheijde and Dr. Mária Kun greatly improved the presentation of the data analysis.


  1. Ábrahám, P., Kóspál, Á., Csizmadia, S., et al. 2004, A&A, 428, 89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bechis, K. P., & Lo, K. Y. 1975, ApJ, 201, 118 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinch, C., Jørgensen, J. K., & Hogerheijde, M. R. 2009, A&A, 502, 199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chavarría, C., Appenzeller, I., & Bertout, C. 1979, A&AS, 36, 465 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elias, J. H. 1978, ApJ, 223, 859 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans, II, N. J., Balkum, S., Levreault, R. M., Hartmann, L., & Kenyon, S. 1994, ApJ, 424, 793 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodrich, R. W. 1987, PASP, 99, 116 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Green, J. D., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1099 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartmann, L., & Kenyon, S. J. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 207 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  10. Herbig, G. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 693 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hogerheijde, M. R., van Dishoeck, E. F., Blake, G. A., & van Langevelde, H. J. 1998, ApJ, 502, 315 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hogerheijde, M. R., van Dishoeck, E. F., Salverda, J. M., & Blake, G. A. 1999, ApJ, 513, 350 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jørgensen, J. K., Hogerheijde, M. R., van Dishoeck, E. F., Blake, G. A., & Schöier, F. L. 2004, A&A, 413, 993 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann, L. 1989, ApJ, 342, 1134 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Langer, W. D., & Penzias, A. A. 1993, ApJ, 408, 539 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levreault, R. M. 1983, ApJ, 265, 855 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Levreault, R. M. 1988, ApJS, 67, 283 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Matthews, B. C., Hogerheijde, M. R., Jørgensen, J. K., & Bergin, E. A. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1374 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. McMuldroch, S., Sargent, A. I., & Blake, G. A. 1993, AJ, 106, 2477 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Momose, M., Ohashi, N., Kawabe, R., Nakano, T., & Hayashi, M. 1998, ApJ, 504, 314 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ossenkopf, V., & Henning, T. 1994, A&A, 291, 943 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  22. Quanz, S. P., Henning, T., Bouwman, J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 668, 359 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Richardson, K. J., White, G. J., Avery, L. W., Lesurf, J. C. G., & Harten, R. H. 1985, ApJ, 290, 637 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sandell, G., & Weintraub, D. A. 2001, ApJS, 134, 115 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Scoville, N. Z., Sargent, A. I., Sanders, D. B., et al. 1986, ApJ, 303, 416 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Turner, N. J. J., Bodenheimer, P., & Bell, K. R. 1997, ApJ, 480, 754 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. van Kempen, T. A., van Dishoeck, E. F., Salter, D. M., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, 167 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2006, ApJ, 650, 956 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Weintraub, D. A., Sandell, G., & Duncan, W. D. 1991, ApJ, 382, 270 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Summary of PdBI observations.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

13CO(1–0) spectra of our targets obtained with the PdBI. Fluxes were integrated over an area of 64″ × 64″ centered on the phase center.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Visibility amplitudes as a function of uv radius. Data were binned in 1 m-wide bins, and the error bars indicate the dispersion of data points within one bin.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

13CO(1–0) maps of our targets, integrated in the velocity ranges indicated above the images. White asterisks indicate optical positions from SIMBAD. Beam sizes are  ≈6  ×  7″. The noise level is σ = 0.10 Jy km s-1; the solid contours are 2σ, 4σ, 6σ, ...; the dashed contours are 0, −2σ, −4σ.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

The optical and millimeter environment of V1515 Cyg. The grayscale image in the background is an SDSS r-band image; the gray contours are the same 13CO(1–0) contours as in Fig. 3. White asterisk indicate the optical stellar position.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.