Table 2

Median values of observed angular widths and deconvolved physical widthsa for three samples of filaments and two angular resolutions.

Field distance [pc] From column density maps with 36.9″ resolution From SPIRE 250 μm images with 18.1″ resolution

FWHMobs σFWHMobs FWHMdec σFWHMdec FWHMobs σFWHMobs FWHMdec σFWHMdec
[″] [″] [pc] [pc] [″] [″] [pc] [pc]
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

IC 5146 460 59 15 0.10 0.03 44 10 0.09 0.02
Aquila 260 94 21 0.11 0.03 97 31 0.12 0.04
Polaris 150 94 24 0.06 0.02 74 20 0.05 0.02

Allb 0.10 0.03 0.09 0.02

Notes. Columns 3 and 7: median value of the observed FWHM angular width before deconvolution. Columns 5 and 9: Median value of the deconvolved FWHM physical width. Columns 4, 6, 8, 10: dispersion (standard deviation) of the distribution of widths for each filament sample.

(a)

The DisPerSE algorithm (Sousbie 2011) we used to trace filaments in the column density maps derived from Herschel data does not consider filamentary width in its process of identifying filaments. While it is difficult to assess the completeness of our census of filamentary structures without dedicated tests (which will be the subject of future work), there is in principle no bias toward selecting structures of similar width with DisPerSE.

(b)

The last row refers to the combined sample of 90 filaments observed in IC 5146, Aquila, and Polaris.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.