Issue |
A&A
Volume 520, September-October 2010
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A52 | |
Number of page(s) | 14 | |
Section | Stellar structure and evolution | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015023 | |
Published online | 04 October 2010 |
Rotation and magnetic activity of the Hertzsprung-gap giant
31 Comae
,![[*]](/icons/foot_motif.png)
K. G. Strassmeier1 - T. Granzer1 -
M. Kopf1 - M. Weber1 - M. Küker1 - P. Reegen2 - J. B. Rice3 - J. M. Matthews4 - R. Kuschnig2 - J. F. Rowe5 - D. B. Guenther6 - A. F. J. Moffat7 - S. M. Rucinski8 - D. Sasselov9 - W. W. Weiss2
1 - Astrophysical Institute Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany
2 - Institut für Astronomie, Universität Wien, Türkenschanzstraße 17, 1180 Wien, Austria
3 - Department of Physics, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba R7A 6A9, Canada
4
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia,
6224 Agricultural Rd., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada,
V6T 1Z1
5 - NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
6 - Department of Astronomy and Physics, St. Mary's
University Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada
7 - Département de
Physique, Université de Montréal C.P. 6128, Succ.
Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
8 - Department of
Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Str.,
Toronto, OM5S 3H4, Canada
9 - Harvard-Smithsonian Center for
Astrophysics 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Received 20 May 2010 / Accepted 15 July 2010
Abstract
Context. The single rapidly-rotating G0 giant 31 Comae
has been a puzzle because of the absence of photometric variability
despite its strong chromospheric and coronal emissions. As a
Hertzsprung-gap giant, it is expected to be at the stage of rearranging
its moment of inertia, hence likely also its dynamo action, which could
possibly be linked with its missing photospheric activity.
Aims. Our aim is to detect photospheric activity, obtain the
rotation period, and use it for a first Doppler image of the star's
surface. Its morphology could be related to the evolutionary status.
Methods. We carried out high-precision, white-light photometry
with the MOST satellite, ground-based Strömgren photometry with
automated telescopes, and high-resolution optical echelle spectroscopy
with the new STELLA robotic facility.
Results. The MOST data reveal, for the first time, light
variations with a full amplitude of 5 mmag and an average
photometric period of
days. Radial-velocity variations with a full amplitude of 270 m s-1 and a period of 6.76 ± 0.02
days were detected from our STELLA spectra, which we also interpret as
due to stellar rotation. The two-year constancy of the average radial
velocity of +
km s-1 confirms the star's single status, as well as the membership in the cluster Melotte 111. A spectrum synthesis gives
K,
,
and [Fe/H] =
,
which together with the revised Hipparcos distance, suggests a mass of
and an age of
540 Myr. The surface lithium abundance is measured to be nearly primordial. A detection of a strong He I
absorption line indicates nonradiative heating processes in the
atmosphere. Our Doppler images show a large, asymmetric polar spot,
cooler than
by
1600 K, and several small low-to-mid latitude features that are warmer by
300-400 K
and are possibly of chromospheric origin. We computed the convective
turnover time for 31 Com as a function of depth and found on
average
days.
Conclusions. 31 Com appears to be just at the onset of
rapid magnetic braking and Li dilution because its age almost exactly
coincides with the predicted onset of envelope convection. That we
recover a big polar starspot despite the Rossby number being larger
than unity, and thus no efficient (envelope) dynamo is expected,
leads us to conclude that 31 Com still harbors a fossil
predominantly poloidal magnetic field. However, the increasing
convective envelope may have just started an interface dynamo that now
is the source of the warm surface features and the corresponding UV and
X-ray emission.
Key words: stars: activity - stars: atmospheres - stars: individual: 31 Comae - starspots - stars: late-type - stars: rotation
1 Introduction
The G0III star 31 Com=HD 111812 is one of the
few single giants that exhibit very rapid rotation despite not
being a member of a close-binary system and thus appear
magnetically overactive. A Ca II H & K emission-line flux
of nearly 107 erg cm-2 s-1 (Strassmeier et al.
1990), a
of 60-70 km s-1(e.g. Reiners 2006), and its apparent single status and
giant luminosity (Bopp & Stencel 1981; Gray et al. 2001a) indicates a relation with the G7III single-star FK Com, the prominent prototype of the FK-Comae class
of stars (e.g. Korhonen et al. 2001,
2009). However, the evolutionary status of these two
objects is rather different, with the latter thought to be the
merger of a previously contact binary.
Early IUE observations of 31 Com by Simon (1984) showed
the presence of highly excited chromospheric and transition-region
emission lines. The star is also a strong X-ray emission source
detected during the ROSAT all-sky survey (Hünsch et al.
1998; for a summary of other measures see Gondoin
1999, 2005), but it exhibits a deficient X-ray
luminosity compared to the coronal proxy C IV and with
respect to mean trends defined by G-K dwarfs (Simon & Drake
1989). Its coronal properties have been studied more
recently with XMM-Newton by Scelsi et al. (2004), who find
that the star's coronal magnetic loops must peak at a temperature
near 107 K. Ayres et al. (1998, 2007) find
that the coronal and transition-region lines are
super-rotationally broadened, e.g., the Fe XXI profile of
31 Com appears with an FWHM of 280 km s-1, more than twice
as wide as expected from
.
A correlation between excess
line broadening and
suggests that transition-zone gas
extends out to about one stellar radius. Ayres et al. (1998) were the first to postulate that the X-ray
deficiency, the lack of photometric variability, and the apparent
highly extended transition region could be understood if the
stellar corona was in fact seated in a relic dipole magnetosphere
left over from the main sequence phase of the star. The large line
broadening, on the other hand, could be explained by the large gas
extension and by transient explosive activity as we know it from
the Sun (see Ayres et al. 2007).
On the contrary, numerous attempts to determine a rotation period
based on photometric variations failed. Strassmeier & Hall
(1988) concluded that 31 Com does not vary
in light but noted that the scatter in their V data was about
twice as high during the 1983-84 season as in the middle of the
following 1984-85 season. Their external uncertainties of the
combined data never exceeded 0.009 mag in V. 31 Com is
clearly not an easy target to detect rotational modulation from
ground-based data. An IUE search for rotational modulation of
ultraviolet emission-line fluxes produced negative results as well
(Simon 1986). Even our long-term APT observations did not
lead to a conclusive period (Strassmeier et al. ) although signals at 6.96 days and 2.31 days were present
in the U-band
APT data but were formally below the limit of
significance, i.e. had an amplitude signal-to-noise ratio of
below 4:1 according to the criteria by Breger et al. ().
However, the star seemed to show seasonal brightness changes
in all bandpasses that were already noted in earlier observations by
Lockwood et al. (1993). The Lowell team
obtained an rms error from eight years of Strömgren data of as
small as 0
0029, i.e. a pretty constant star for ground-based
photometry, but mentioned that 31 Com is variable on a seasonal
timescale. Strassmeier et al. (1997a)
presented a plot of seasonal photometry over almost 13 years that
also showed the long-term constancy of 31 Com. Nevertheless, this
led Kazarovets et al. (2003) to include 31 Comae in the 77th
name list of variable stars as LS Comae.
31 Comae is most interesting because of its evolutionary status as a
Hertzsprung-gap star and a possible member of the close
Coma-Berenices cluster Melotte 111 (Bounatiro 1993;
Odenkirchen et al. 1998). The vast majority of early-G stars
are comparably slow rotators, but some have rotational line
broadening up to 100 km s-1 (Hagen & Stencel 1985; Gray
1989). The sudden decline in rotation at spectral type
G0-3III in the sample investigated by Gray (1989) partly
results from a mix of stars of different masses and ages associated
with the rapid evolution into the Hertzsprung gap (De Medeiros &
Mayor 1999; De Medeiros et al. 2000) and partly
from deep mixing (Böhm-Vitense 2004). As a G0III star,
31 Com is in a pre-braking phase but already started a rearrangement
of its internal moment of inertia as the hydrogen-burning shell
expands rather quickly at that stage. For a 2.5-
star this
phase lasts for
6 Myr according to the models with
overshooting from Pietrinferni et al. (2004) and therefore
Hertzsprung-gap stars are rather rare. Bright ``sister stars'' of
31 Com are known though, e.g. HR 9024 (G1III),
Psc
(G0III), and 35 Cnc = HR 3387 (G0III) (Wallerstein et al. 1994; Bopp et al. 1988), but also the G0-1III
primary of the Capella binary system (Ayres & Linsky
1980) resembles 31 Com.
In this paper, we first present and describe our new MOST data and a set of new photometric APT observations along with earlier data (Sect. 2). In the same section, we also present new long-term high-resolution spectroscopy of 31 Com obtained at STELLA, KPNO, and CFHT. In Sect. 3, we apply various period-search algorithms to the photometry and the radial velocities. The MOST observations revealed, for the first time, the flux modulation due to the rotation of the star. In Sect. 3.4 we analyze the STELLA radial velocities in the same way as the photometry. A more in-depth determination and a discussion of 31 Comae's stellar parameters are presented in Sect. 4. Section 5 presents the first attempt to Doppler image the surface of 31 Comae followed by our discussion (Sect. 6) and conclusions (Sect. 7).
2 Acquisition of photometric and spectroscopic data
Table 1 is a summary of all observations in this paper. In particular, it lists the total number of individual spectra and light-curve points, N, for the individual telescopes, respectively. Telescopes are indicated by their short name, CF is the 0.9 m coudé feed telescope at Kitt Peak, and STELLA is the AIP robotic facility in Tenerife. PMT stands for photomultiplier tube.
2.1 MOST photometry from 2007
MOST observed 31 Com (V = 4
9, B-V = 0
67) from March 15 to 25,
2007. In that period the star was acquired during about half of each
101 min spacecraft orbit, the remaining time was used to observe
another field. The data were obtained in the Direct Imaging field
producing a PSF with
2.5 pixel FWHM (3 arcsec pixel-1)
rendered in
pixel subrasters of the 1 k
1 k CCD
frame. With an exposure time of 0.3 s plus accounting for frame
transfer and readout time an image was gathered every 0.8 s. To
conform with data transfer limitations, 52 images were stacked
together onboard the satellite. Data extraction was performed on
stacked images obtained every 42 s (effective sampling time).
The constant A-star HD 112152 (V =9
05, A3V) was
observed during the same time interval and with the same sampling as
31 Com and is shown in Fig. 1a for comparison. Its data were
additionally binned in units of the MOST orbital period (101 min) to
increase the signal. The data reduction scheme (Rowe et al.
2006) is based on conventional aperture photometry with an
additional correction for straylight contribution. The 31 Com
photometry reveals a point-to-point scatter of 0.9 mmag. The
corresponding light curve is shown in Fig. 1a.
Table 1: Summary of new observations in this paper.
![]() |
Figure 1: MOST photometry of 31 Com in March 2007. a) Light curve for a continuous 11-day run ( top panel) and of a fainter comparison star ( lower panel; HD 112152, A3V; unbinned data are shown as grey-scale dots, binned data as black dots). The abscissa is in fractional days from JD 2 451 545 and the magnitudes are MOST instrumental magnitudes. b) DFT periodogram from the MOST data. The full line is 31 Com, the dashed line is for the comparison star HD 112152. The abscissa is in units of cycles per day. |
Open with DEXTER |
2.2 APT Strömgren and Johnson photometry from 1997-2003
Continuous photometry was obtained with the two 0.75 m T6 & T7 Vienna University Automatic Photoelectric Telescopes (APT) and the 0.25 m T1 Phoenix telescope, both located at Fairborn Observatory in Arizona (Strassmeier et al. 1997b, 2001). The T6 data are the result of a contemporaneous run from February 4 to June 27, 1996 (76 nights). The number of data points is 378 in Strömgren b and 385 in y. The vb data are the result of a continuous 16-night campaign with T6 in May 2002 and consist of 239 points in Strömgren v and 232 points in y with 30 readings per night on average. Each one of these is actually a mean of three individual interpolations between the variable and the comparison star (see Granzer et al. 2001).
The T1 UBV and T7
data are a continuation of the 1996/97
data already described and analyzed in Strassmeier et al. (1997a,1999)
and were taken on a single-reading-per-night basis with T1 from fall
1997 until spring 2003 and with T7 until 1998. Table 1
summarizes the exact time ranges of all new observations in this
paper. We removed 31 Com from the target list of T7 but kept it on
T1 until its retirement in late 2003 in order to monitor 31 Com's
long-term brightness. These data are presented in their original
form in the electronic attachment but are not used in the present
analysis due to their moderate 1%-like precision.
All APT observations were made differentially with respect to
HD 111469 as the comparison star (
,
;
Nicolet 1978) and HD 113996 (
,
;
Moffett & Barnes ) as the check star. All three telescopes reached approximately
one million counts for integrations of 10 s (30 s in U for T1), and
thereby achieved an external precision of 1.2 mmag (T6 in y),
4 mmag (T7 in V), and 10 mmag (T1 in V).
2.3 STELLA echelle spectroscopy from 2007-2008
From Mar 16, 2007 to Mar 22, 2008 we obtained 187 high-resolution
echelle spectra with the 1.2 m robotic STELLA-I telescope and its
fiber-fed STELLA Echelle Spectrograph (SES; Strassmeier et al. 2004). During the period Mar 10-22, 2008 the
one-picks-per-night observing schedule was changed to five picks per
night to search for short-term variations. All spectra cover the
wavelength range from 390-880 nm with increasing inter-order gaps
starting at 720 nm. Together with its 2k 2k, 13.5-
m E2V
CCD it provides an effective resolving power of
R = 55 000corresponding to a spectral resolution of 5.5 km s-1 at 650 nm.
Exposure time was set to 800 s and yielded S/N ratios between
300-100:1 (per resolution bin) depending upon weather conditions.
Reference spectra of MK-standard stars as well as radial-velocity
standards were obtained throughout the entire observing period.
The echelle spectra were automatically reduced and extracted using
the IRAF-based STELLA data-reduction pipeline (see Weber et al.
2008). The images were corrected for bad pixels and cosmic
rays. Bias levels were removed by subtracting the average overscan
from each image followed by the subtraction of the mean of the
(already overscan subtracted) master bias frame. The target
spectra were flattened through a division by the master flat which
had been normalized to unity. Radial velocities from STELLA-SES
spectra were derived from an order-by-order cross correlation with
a synthetic template spectrum and then averaged. The standard
error of a STELLA-SES observation of 31 Com is
100 m s-1. Individual observations are given in
Table 2. No systemic zero point shift was added. The rms
value given is the rms from cross correlations of 19 spectral
orders. The complete data set is available in electronic form at
the CDS.
Table 2: Barycentric STELLA radial velocities.
Table 3: KPNO radial velocities.
2.4 KPNO coudé spectroscopy from 1994-1998
Altogether 93 spectra were obtained at Kitt Peak National
Observatory (KPNO) with the 0.9 m coudé feed telescope during
runs in Mar. 4-18, 1994, Feb. 24-Mar. 7, 1995, Jan. 11-26,
1996, Dec. 26-Jan. 15, 1997/98, and April 3-22, 1998. In
1994-1996, a
TI CCD (TI-5 chip, 15
pixels) was
used with grating A, camera 5 and the long collimator at R =38 000that gave a 8-nm wavelength range centered at 642 nm. An exposure
time of 1200 s resulted on average in a S/N of 200:1. From 1998 on,
we used the 3k
1k Ford3k CCD that gave a wavelength coverage
of 30nm but with a lower resolution of
R = 27 000 at 650 nm but
comparable S/N.
All data were reduced in the standard fashion using IRAF and included standard bias subtraction, flat fielding and aperture extraction. Frequent wavelength comparison spectra and spectra of bright radial-velocity standards were obtained several times throughout a night to ensure an accurate wavelength calibration.
Radial velocities from the KPNO spectra were derived from cross
correlating the 31 Com spectra mostly with the IAU velocity
standard 16 Vir (K0.5III,
km s-1). Occasionally, other IAU standards were employed, i.e.
Aur (K0III,
km s-1),
Tau (K5III, +54.1 km s-1), HR 3145 (K2III, +70.90 km s-1), and
Gem (K0III, +3.30 km s-1). The standard error of a KPNO observation is 4-7 km s-1. This is anomalously high for spectra at the given resolution but is due to the broad line profiles of 31 Com.
Individual observations and the adopted cross-correlation
reference star are given in Table 3. From 1994-1995 the
error of a single unit-weight velocity was 4.5 km s-1. In 1996, a
CCD with smaller pixels but also smaller wavelength coverage was
used and the uncertainties were accordingly larger,
7 km s-1. In 1998, the larger wavelength coverage with a
bigger CCD reduced this again to 4.0 km s-1. The cross-correlation
reference stars 16 Vir,
Aur, HR 3145,
Tau, and
Gem were used with an adopted velocity of +35.70, +7.61,
+70.90, +54.1 and +3.30 km s-1, respectively. The complete data set
is available in electronic form at the CDS.
2.5 CFHT coudé spectroscopy from 1993
Strassmeier et al. (1994) presented a
subset of the CFHT spectra obtained in December 1993. A total of
four spectra, covering the wavelength range 633-653 nm and one
covering the lithium 671 nm region, were obtained. We used the f/8
coudé spectrograph with the 600 l mm-1 mosaic grating in first
order. The effective resolving power was 27 000 with the
2k 2k Lick CCD and allowed a S/N ratio of close to 400:1 in
900 s.
3 Rotational period search
3.1 Summary of techniques
Four different techniques are applied in the course of this paper:
- -
- Phase dispersion minimization (PDM, Lafler & Kinman 1965; Stellingwerf 1978) is a reliable approach to non-sinusoidal variations such as rotational modulations caused by stellar surface structure. Its advantage over the Fourier methods (especially if not more than a single-periodic process is considered) is that no initial assumption on the shape of the signal needs to be drawn.
- -
- SIGSPEC, developed by Reegen (2007), relies on a frequency- and phase-dependent statistical treatment of the discrete Fourier
transform (DFT). For a given DFT amplitude A, it provides unbiased
spectral significance
, directly linked to false-alarm probabilities
via
(1)
taking into account the properties of the time-domain sampling appropriately. - -
- The Lomb-Scargle (L-S) periodogram is designed for unevenly spaced data. Lomb (1976) proposed to use least-squares fits to sinusoidal curves and Scargle (1982) extended this by deriving the null distribution for it. We use the formulation implemented by Press et al. (2002).
- -
- CLEAN was originally invented to clean radio maps from noise (Roberts et al. 1987). Applied to time series it removes iteratively the artificial frequencies introduced due to the window function.
3.2 Application to MOST photometry
Figure 1a shows the MOST photometry and Fig. 1b a DFT
periodogram over a large period range. It reveals a clear peak at
0.31 c/d, or
3.2 days. Its window function is
sufficiently clean, and our expected rotational signal is not
affected by the fact that 31 Com was not observed exclusively during
each spacecraft orbit of 101.4 min (14.2 c/d; Walker et al. 2003). The
0.3 c/d peak is confirmed by the
L-S approach (Fig. 2a) which provides a refined period of
days.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Periodograms for the MOST data with a) the
Lomb-Scargle algorithm, b) the Phase-Dispersion Minimization
(PDM), and c) a statistical treatment of the Discrete Fourier
Transform (DFT) as formulated by Reegen (2007). The DFT
amplitude, A, in mmag (top curve), is shown on the right ordinate
(inverted) and its significance,
|
Open with DEXTER |
The phase-dispersion diagram in Fig. 2b reveals two pronounced local minima at periods of 3.4 and 6.8 days. While the 3.4-day minimum is well-defined and symmetric, the 6.8-day minimum appears split into two equal minima at 6.88 and 6.45 days. In addition, there is a trend towards a lower phase dispersion with increasing period. This addresses a general PDM-related problem for periods reaching the order of the time spanned by the data set. In this case, the number of phase bins containing data from different periods becomes poor, and even for periods not referring to an intrinsic signal, the variance within the bins will remain of the order of the total variance because the high systematic deviations of data originating from different cycles are missing. If we remove this trend to first order, i.e. by dividing the relative phase dispersion by a low-order polynomial fit to its upper envelope, the 3.4-day minimum appears 36% deeper than the 6.8-day minimum.
The DFT application with SIGSPEC uses a fundamental frequency f plus a set of harmonics, i.e.
,
h=0,1,...,H.
As discussed in detail by Reegen et al. (2006), MOST light
curves potentially suffer from stray-light induced artifacts, which
produce pseudo-periodicities close to the orbital period of the
spacecraft (101.4 min). Since the rotation period of the star is
expected to be considerably longer than 1 day, setting H=12avoids a contamination of the frequencies below 1 d-1 by the
stray-light artifacts around 14.2 d-1.
A combined DFT amplitude and significance spectrum is displayed in Fig. 2c. The greatest significance is associated with an amplitude peak of 1.0 mmag found at 0.143 c/d. Comparing this frequency to the Rayleigh frequency resolution (the inverse length of the dataset) of 0.09145 c/d, this peak has to be considered as an indication of a signal at a period too long to be resolvable by the DFT. However, the significance attains another maximum at 0.296 c/d which corresponds to a period of 3.378 days, in good agreement with the period found by PDM, Lomb-Scargle, and a standard FFT. Unfortunately, the high-amplitude peak at 0.143 c/d does not permit us to state whether twice the 3.378-day period is also obtainable by DFT.
The advantage of PDM compared to DFT is that PDM does not imply any assumption on the shape of the examined signal, whereas the DFT implicitly relies on the sinusoids. If a signal is non-sinusoidal (as in case of the MOST data), the DFT spreads the power contained in this signal over the signal frequency and all integer multiples. A weakness of the PDM analysis is that each of the aforementioned local minima is superposed by several sharp peaks spaced by approximately the 101.4 min period of the MOST orbit. PDM recovers the 6.8-d period as the most significant.
In principle, very small photometric amplitudes or even non detections of rotational modulation of otherwise magnetically active stars may be due to several reasons. Firstly, a low inclination of the axis of rotation with respect to the observer may prevent the detection of rotational-modulation in the disk-integrated light curve. Secondly, a star's surface may show a large number of small faculae and/or spots distributed symmetrically over the surface at the same time (like a chessboard structure). In this case, simple local flux cancelation would prevent the detection of light changes by means of disk-integrated photometry. A third reason for a non detection could be that the relatively thin convective envelope of a G0 star may prohibit the formation of large-scale photospheric and chromospheric surface structure and result in a more uniform spot distribution. Because the MOST light curve shape appeared not perfectly repeated in the second stellar rotation, we conclude that it is most likely that the white-light bandpass of MOST is dominated by faculae rather than spots with a variability time scale significantly shorter than the rotational period. This is more of a solar analogy than what we would expect for a giant star rotating 30 times faster than the Sun.
3.3 Application to APT photometry
Each of the seasonal data sets was analyzed with the four algorithms described in Sect. 3.1. As we have seen from the application to the MOST data, not all algorithms provide a reliable recovery. Whenever possible, seasonal data were first split into subsets from the three telescope - T1, T6, and T7 - and analyzed individually. This appeared necessary because the zero-point shifts between the three telescopes (cf. Strassmeier et al. ) likely exceed the expected amplitude of 31 Com and would confuse or even suppress the rotational-modulation signal. The corresponding seasonal and instrumental amplitude spectra and spectral windows are not given in detail but all spectral windows show strong 1-day aliasing and the expected high degree of symmetry with respect to 0.5 c/d. None of the T1 and T7 data showed a clear period above its respective noise levels and were not further investigated.
Only the 1996 and 2002 T6 data seem to have sufficient photometric precision that would allow the detection of an amplitude and period comparable to the MOST data. Because periods shorter than one day would lead to unrealistically large equatorial rotational velocities for a G0 giant, we considered only the range between 0 and 1 c/d, claiming all frequencies exceeding this upper limit to be aliases of the ``true'' frequency. The frequency and amplitude of the highest peak in each amplitude spectrum are taken as initial values for a least-squares fit. Amplitude and period rms errors are computed by means of numerical simulations of error propagation as provided by the program EPSim (Reegen 2004).
![]() |
Figure 3: Significance spectra of the APT light curves. From top to bottom: b 1996, y 1996, v 2002, y 2002. Note that the amplitude scale for 1996 and 2002 are different. For each frequency, f, the significance of this frequency and 12 integer multiples are added up, returning the False-Alarm Probability for the fundamental and harmonics simultaneously, thus taking into account the expected non-sinusoidal photometric variation invoked by the rotating surface. The length of the pins referred to the right (inverted) ordinate and represent the best-fitting frequencies (Eq. (1)) and the individual amplitudes of all 12 harmonics. |
Open with DEXTER |
Table 4: Best-fit periods in days from the MOST observations, the four APT T6 data sets, and the STELLA radial velocities.
As a cross check, we apply exactly the same S IGS PEC DFT
analysis as for the MOST data and plot the significance spectra in
Fig. 3. Again, the significance spectra represent the
(negative) logarithm of the false alarm probability of the
considered frequency plus 12 integer multiples. The rotational
frequencies obtained from all four data sets are in acceptable
agreement with the value obtained from the MOST photometry. A
summary of all period determinations is provided in Table 4.
We adopt an average from the MOST photometry of
by assuming equal weights for the different methods where the
error is now simply its rms. Figures 4a,b show
phase plots for the MOST and the APT photometry, respectively. The
MOST data are additionally plotted with half of the adopted period
for visual comparison.
![]() |
Figure 4: Phased light curves. a) The MOST light curve from 2007. Shown are the light curves phased with the 6.80-day ( bottom) and the 3.38-day period ( top). b) Our best-sampled APT light curve with a period of 7.045 days (data set APT b 1996 in Table 4). The zero phase is arbitrary. |
Open with DEXTER |
3.4 Application to STELLA radial velocities
3.4.1 Mean radial velocities and error estimates
We measured a total of 187 radial velocities with STELLA between 2007-2008, 93 radial velocities at KPNO between 1994-1998, and five at CFHT in 1993. Not surprisingly, all these measures have different zero points. Moreover, the KPNO data were obtained with different setups during a total of five observing runs with varying cross-correlation reference targets (depending upon observing season). Besides, CFHT and KPNO data were single order spectra that, together with the large line broadening of 31 Com, resulted in uncertainties for individual measurements of as high as 4-7 km s-1. This is simply because radial velocity determinations with the cross-correlation technique from short chunks of the spectrum are intrinsically much less precise than from echelle spectra with a large wavelength coverage. Additionally, some of the cross-correlation profiles showed asymmetries that most likely resulted from a non-uniform distribution of star spots at certain epochs, e.g., in 1993 (Strassmeier et al. ).
Bounatiro (1993) listed a single radial-velocity measure of
-1.48 km s-1 in agreement with other mostly single measures, e.g.,
of -
km s-1 (deMedeiros & Mayor 1999),
km s-1 (Holmberg et al. 2007) or -
(Gontcharov 2006). Odenkirchen et al. (1998)
concluded on an average cluster velocity of -
km s-1 for
Melotte 111. Recently, Mermilliod et al. (2008) improved that
value to +
km s-1 based on 28 members. Madsen et al. (2002) presented an astrometric radial
velocity of +2.1 km s-1 obtained from a kinematic solution of the
Coma Berenices moving cluster using data from the Hipparcos
main catalogue. The 40 members of the cluster in their study had a
range of radial velocities between +(1.2-2.8) km s-1. Our late 2007
and all 2008 STELLA spectra show a mean (barycentric) velocity of
+
(rms) km s-1. Its rms is a combination of the
rotational modulation and the uncertainty from the large rotational
line broadening. The initial 2007 STELLA data had a zero-point
offset with respect to the late 2007 and all 2008 data of
-0.35 km s-1 which was caused by a misalignment of the fiber exit
with respect to the spectrograph collimator (see Weber et al. 2008) and was properly corrected. We have shifted the earlier 2007 data by +0.35 km s-1. Note that the rms is also two
times higher for the initial 2007 data than for the rest. A
preliminary zero point from four K0III standard stars (Strassmeier
et al. 2010) ties the STELLA velocities to the CORAVEL system
when subtracting 460 m s-1 from the STELLA radial velocities. The
mean radial velocity of 31 Com becomes then +
km s-1.
3.4.2 Rotational modulation
Starspots influence the symmetry of spectral line profiles and thereby influence also the radial velocity measurement. In eclipsing binaries such modulations are known as the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect when one component eclipses parts of one hemisphere of the other component which leads to an asymmetric line profile. This way stellar rotation was discovered in the early twenties of the previous century (Rossiter 1924; McLaughlin 1924). The effect is now being used to detect and characterize the transits of extrasolar planets (e.g. Dreizler et al. 2009). Radial velocity modulations due to the asymmetric line profiles of cool starspots can nowadays be detected, e.g., for the pre-main sequence star LkCa 19 (Huerta et al. 2008) or the very active main-sequence star V889 Her (Huber et al. 2009).
For a search of rotationally induced radial-velocity modulations in 31 Comae, we decided not to combine the various data sets, as with the APT photometry, and therefore refrained from an uncertain inter-annual, inter-instrumental zero-point correction. Instead, we focus on the best sampled, most homogeneous and most precise data set from the STELLA robotic telescope.
A phase-dispersion diagram of the 2008 data revealed a minimum at
6.80 days with a full amplitude of 250 m s-1. A CLEANed
periodogram suggested a frequency peak corresponding to 6.73 days
and comparable amplitude. None of the four algorithms applied
(CLEAN, L-S, PDM, and DFT) showed a statistically truly significant
peak though, partly due to the limited number of measurements
available. Table 4 summarizes all results. DFT showed no
clear single peak at all while PDM, CLEAN and L-S gave the highest
peak around
c/d (Fig. 5a). To assess the
relevance of this frequency we applied a bootstrapping procedure to
our data following the recipe of Press et al. (2002). One
particular problem with this technique for period-search
applications is the inherent change of the sampling. Therefore, only
very robust results can be drawn from such an analysis which is, in
a certain way, also its advantage. We generated one thousand test
sets by replacing 36.8% (1/e) of the original data with randomly
chosen data points from the same data set. L-S and CLEAN where then
applied to all thousand data sets and the five highest frequency
peaks recorded for each. For both period analyses, L-S and CLEAN,
the most frequently occurring peak was 0.148 c/d in 50% of the L-S
cases and in 68.5% of the CLEAN cases. The second most dominant
peak at 0.242 c/d was found in 46.7% of the L-S cases but only in
39.7% of the CLEAN cases. We consequentially used the average
frequency as the starting value for a least-square minimization of a
purely harmonic fit to our original velocities. It yielded a final
peak of 0.14791 c/d that was only marginally different from the
original frequency but with a full amplitude of
m s-1. The
corresponding period of 6.761 d was used to finally phase the STELLA
data as shown in Fig. 5b.
![]() |
Figure 5: STELLA radial velocities from the 2007/2008 observing season. a) CLEAN periodogram; b) phased radial-velocity curve. None of the four periodogram algorithms, CLEAN, L-S, PDM, and DFT, showed a statistically truly significant peak. However, a bootstrapping procedure identifies the f = 0.148 c/d peak as the most solid frequency. This peak is then used as a starting value for a least-square minimization of a purely harmonic function and results in the best-fit period of 6.761 d. The sinusoidal peak-to-peak amplitude is 270 m s-1. |
Open with DEXTER |
Saar & Donahue (1997) and Hatzes (2002) gave a
relationship of velocity amplitude A in m s-1 with spot coverage
F in per cent and line broadening
in km s-1 (
). This relationship would suggest
for 31 Com. We conclude, firstly, that the star is
single and that the 6.8-day period is indeed the true rotation
period and, secondly, that the spot and/or surface-velocity
distribution was significantly asymmetric with respect to the
central meridian so that the disk-integrated radial velocities could
be modulated.
4 Global physical parameters of 31 Comae
4.1 Variability time scale
Figure 4 shows phase plots of the MOST data as well as of our
best-sampled APT T6 data. The STELLA radial velocities are shown in
Fig. 5b. For all cases the peak-to-peak amplitudes are at the
mmag or the m s-1 level. The MOST data are plotted with both
possible periods (3.38 and 6.80 days, respectively). The 3.38-day
period gives a slightly larger amplitude but increases the overall
scatter by approximately 20%. The 6.8-day period preserves the
scatter as evident in the time plot in Fig. 1a but makes the
phased light curve more complex. Nevertheless, the MOST light curve resembles that of the Sun during
sunspot maximum (see, e.g., Fröhlich 2009), being likely
dominated by bright faculae rather than dark spots. Changes of the
light-curve shape from one rotation to the next suggests surface
variability on time scales shorter than the rotational period. In
white light, like for MOST, it stems from a mixture of spots and
faculae and presumably is dominated by faculae that have their
emission peak in the blue part of the spectrum. This is likely the
reason why it is so difficult to pinpoint the rotation period of
Hertzsprung-gap giants. We may add though
that we never saw a flare in our long-term BVRI photometric
monitoring.
4.2 Distance, radius, rotational velocity, and inclination
Bell & Gustafsson (1989) predicted an angular diameter of
0.91 mas based on the apparent bolometric flux of
W cm-2. It is also listed in the CHARM-2
catalog (Richichi et al. 2005). An
independent estimate for future VLTI measurements by Wittkowski et al. (2002) arrived at the same diameter.
Hipparcos originally measured a trigonometric parallax of
mas (ESA 1997). The revised Hipparcos
parallax of
mas (van Leeuwen 2007) corresponds
now to a distance of 89.1
+1.9-1.7 pc instead of
94+9-7 pc. Both parallaxes are in agreement with estimated
parallaxes from a kinematic (open-cluster) solution by Madsen et al.
(2002) though. The new parallax and the angular
diameter convert to a stellar radius of
for
31 Com, where the error includes an estimated 10% error for the
angular diameter.
Earlier
measurements based on photographic plates and
partly on low spectral resolution and moderate S/N ratio ranged from
90 km s-1 to 50 km s-1 (Bernacca 1973; see also Wallerstein et al. 1994). More modern measures gave generally smaller
values, e.g.,
km s-1 (Strassmeier et al.
1994),
km s-1 (deMedeiros &
Mayor 1999), and
km s-1 (Reiners
2006). With the higher resolution STELLA spectra and their
much broader wavelength range, combined with the more direct
synthetic spectrum fitting as described in Sect. 4.3, we revise
our earlier
measurement to
km s-1 (with a fixed
microturbulence of 1.5 km s-1 and a macroturbulence of 5 km s-1). Note
that Bernacca (1973) already listed a measurement of
km s-1.
With this
and a period of 6.761 d, the minimum radius,
,
is
.
Despite it is larger than the
radius from the angular diameter, the two values are consistent
within their errors. We conclude that the stellar inclination, i,
is most likely close to 90
,
i.e. equator-on. However, the
uncertainties of the angular diameter based radius and the
measure formally allow an inclination of as low as
60
.
4.3 Effective temperature, gravity, and metallicity
Gray et al. (2001a,b) had 31 Com in
their sample of late-A to early-G stars. They fitted
low-resolution spectra in the 380-460 nm range with synthetic
spectra based on ATLAS-9 atmospheres simultaneous with fluxes from
Strömgren photometry and found
K,
,
a ``microturbulence'' of 1.7 km s-1, and a metallicity of
-0.27 dex with respect to the Sun
. Given its uncertainties of
80 K,
0.10 dex in
,
and
0.10 in metallicity,
the values are in agreement with the uvby-based
Geneva-Copenhagen (GC) survey result of 5875 K but in disagreement
with its original [Fe/H] = +0.14 value (Holmberg et al.
2007). The revised GC catalog (Holmberg et al.
2009) lists
K and [Fe/H] = -0.17. The
infrared flux method was used by Bell & Gustafsson
(1989) to obtain 5841 K. Other
values in
the literature are, e.g.,
K (Reiners 2006)
based on
photometry or 5572 K (Böhm-Vitense 2004) based on the Tycho/Hipparcos B-V. The sub-solar
metallicity of -0.27 dex, i.e. the corrected Gray et al.
(2001a) value, is somewhat in disagreement with
31 Com being a member of Melotte 111. Odenkirchen et al.
(1998) compiled a mean cluster metallicity of -0.062 with
a dispersion of 0.023. We notice that the two other rapidly
rotating, early-G giants in Table 1 in Gray et al.
(2001b),
Psc and 35 Cnc, have
been measured with practically the same metallicity as 31 Com, as
well as similar E(b-y). This is particularly interesting because
all three stars are very active and rapidly rotating giants,
though their Strömgren fluxes likely not a good choice for
reddening determinations.
We used five out of the 81 echelle orders of our STELLA-SES spectra
to determine the effective temperature, gravity and metallicity by
fitting a synthetic spectrum. This fit is shown in Fig. 6. We
employ the method and the numerical tools described in
Allende-Prieto et al. (2004, 2006). Synthetic spectra
are tabulated with metallicities between -1 dex and +0.5 dex in
steps of 0.5 dex, logarithmic gravities between 0 and 5 in steps of
0.5, and temperatures between 3500 K and 50 000 K in steps of
250 K for a wavelength range of 380-920 nm. This grid is then
used to compare with the five selected echelle orders of each
spectrum (all in the wavelength range between 549-623 nm). The final
values per spectral order are chosen on the basis of a weighted
least-squares minimization fit with predetermined and fixed .
From a total of 187 spectra, the mean and the standard
deviations comprise then the best value and its internal precision.
We found
K,
,
and
[Fe/H] =
.
Our spectroscopic
value is
significantly cooler than the Gray et al. (2001a,b) value but agrees with the Strömgren colors, while
and the metallicity are better constrained and agree with
the Gray et al. study within their respective error bars. Our
metallicity tends to be more solar and now better agrees with the
average Melotte-111 cluster metallicity.
![]() |
Figure 6:
Portions of five echelle orders from STELLA used to derive the
photospheric parameters for 31 Com. The thin line is the data
and the thick line is our synthetic-spectrum fit with PARSES. Note
the ``misfit'' for the He I 587.56-nm line (total line
equivalent width
|
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 6 also shows the detection of a He I D3-line at
587.56 nm. The presence of this line indicates non-radiative
heating processes in the atmosphere on 31 Comae since the line
cannot be excited at photospheric temperatures. After subtraction
of the photospheric fit (the thick line in Fig. 6) the
blend-corrected equivalent width of the He I line is
mÅ. This is exceptionally strong with respect to
active G and K dwarfs (at least factor 2-3) in the sample of Saar
et al. (1997) and again manifests the strong
chromospheric magnetic activity of 31 Comae.
4.4 Mass, luminosity, age, and angular momentum
The distance of 89 pc and the apparent V brightness of 4
935
convert to an absolute magnitude of +0
19
0.05. The star is
closer than 100 pc and thus no interstellar absorption was taken
into account despite the fact that Gray et al. () inferred
E(b-y) = 0
06 from Strömgren indices, but see
above. With a bolometric correction of -0.102 taken from Flower
(1996) and based on
K, or B-V = 0
67,
a luminosity of
follows (adopting
= 4
75 for the Sun). If we deduce the radius from the
predicted angular diameter, and use the same
as above,
the luminosity is
,
in fair agreement with the
distance-based luminosity. The 42-K error for
makes
only little difference here. According to the evolutionary tracks
from the BaSTI grid (Pietrinferni et al. 2004) with
[Fe/H] = -0.15 and with overshooting the best match in the H-R
diagram is provided with a mass of
and an
isochrone with a nominal age of 540 Myr. Figure 7 shows the
position of 31 Com with respect to these evolutionary tracks. The
insert is a zoom and indicates the aging sequence for a
2.5-
track. Note that the error bars that we give in
Table 5 for the mass and the age are solely with respect to
the observational uncertainties and do not take into account the
uncertainties of the tracks themselves. Note also that a comparison
with tracks without overshooting (and same metallicity as above)
would increase the mass by
10% and decrease the age by
36%.
![]() |
Figure 7:
31 Comae in the H-R diagram
|
Open with DEXTER |
Table 5: Astrophysical properties of 31 Comae.
The open-cluster age of Melotte 111 in the literature varies between
300 Myr and 1 Gyr but recent isochrone fittings constrain an age
between 400-500 Myrs (Odenkirchen et al. 1998; see also the
summary in Casewell et al. 2006). Our new value is more
precise and likely also more accurate and agrees well with the age
of
Gyr listed in the revised GC catalog of Holmberg et al. (2009).
The absolute parameters in Table 5 constrain the
logarithmic (pseudo) angular momentum, m R v, to
with respect to today's Sun. This appears larger than expected from simple conservation arguments (Gray 1992). According to the Pietrinferni et al. (2004) models, 31 Com was a B9 star on the ZAMS with
K and a radius of
2
.
If we assume mass and angular-momentum conservation its equatorial
rotational velocity was then around 176 km s-1, which is faster by
20% than an average B9-A0V star (Gray 1992).
With the current values for 31 Com and their errors given, can we
validate or falsify the usual assumption of angular-momentum
conservation from the ZAMS until today? Just recently, Kim & Barnes
(2008) computed evolutionary tracks and moment-of-inertia
models for a 2.5
star using the Yale Rotating Star
Evolution Code (Demarque et al. 2008) with solar metallicity.
In their models, a convective envelope first appears at 539 Myr, so
no mass loss due to magnetized winds is expected before that. The
moment of inertia of such a model at the ZAMS, i.e. 3.8 Myr post the
birthline, is
g cm2. It decreases briefly
at 5-10 Myr to a minimum of
g cm2, then
increases steadily so that at 540 Myr it is
g cm2. At this last stage, the model turns out a star that is at 5570 K and 35.6
.
As this is discrepant to our measured
values by about 90 K for the temperature and a factor of two for the
luminosity, Kim & Barnes (priv. commun.) recomputed the
2.5
model including core overshoot of 0.2 and with
sub-solar metallicity. The results show a luminosity of
80.5
and
K at an age of 540.8 Myr,
which now seems to agree with our observations. The moment of
inertia is
g cm2 at this age, having
increased from
g cm2 at the ZAMS by more
than an order of magnitude. Consequently, our rotation period of
6.8 d at 540.8 Myr works out to an expected period of 0.42 d on the
ZAMS, corresponding essentially to maximal angular momentum of the
model, and hence no loss by today's age of 31 Com. At the base of
the giant branch at 541.7 Myr, and 5400 K and 56
,
the
moment of inertia will be
g cm2, so the
expected rotation period in
1 Myr would be
22 d if
no further angular-momentum loss takes place. This translates to a
(linear) period decrease
which is,
unfortunately, not detectable with the current precision.
The above moment-of-inertia model with core overshoot is the very first one computed, so it is currently only safe to say that angular momentum loss via winds has not taken place despite the star having crossed much of the Hertzprung gap. This is entirely consistent with stars starting with maximal or near-maximal angular momentum on the ZAMS and conserving it up to and throughout most of the Hertzsprung gap. We also assumed rigid-body rotation throughout the age of 31 Com and in particular also when on the ZAMS and shortly thereafter when the moment of inertia is at a minimum. It is remarkable that the predicted onset of envelope convection coincides so precisely with the current age of 31 Com. With the further increase of the depth of the convective envelope towards the RGB the star will likely maintain its magnetic activity until it arrives at the end of its first ascend of the RGB when significant mass loss sets in. However, with the increase of dynamo activity due to the increase of the convective envelope, 31 Com must be also prone to magnetic braking, comparable to solar-mass main-sequence stars as we know it from the Skumanich law (Skumanich 1972; see also e.g. Barnes 2003). The predicted period decrease becomes then just a lower limit.
4.5 Lithium abundance
Our high-resolution spectra show a strong Li I resonance
line at 670.78 nm, as already found by Wallerstein et al.
(1994), Böhm-Vitense (2004), and others. The
only other lithium line in the optical spectrum, the subordinate
line at 610.36 nm (actually a close triplet), appears fully
blended with the nearby Ca I+Fe I blend at 610.27 nm
and remains practically unmeasurable. The de-blended equivalent
width of the 670.78 nm line is
mÅ. It is blended in
the blue wings with the unresolved Fe I+V I
line
pair at 670.5 nm, itself having an equivalent width of 96 mÅ
from a double Gaussian fit, and in the red wing by several
unresolved CN and 24MgH features. Note that the nearby
Ca I line at 671.7 nm appears slightly stronger than the Li
line with an equivalent width of
188 mÅ. The 171-mÅ equivalent width of Li is converted to an abundance of
(with respect to
)
based on
K and
in the NLTE tables in
Pavlenko & Magazzú (1996). Due to the large
we cannot separate the two isotopes 6Li and 7Li. The
uncertainties of
42 K for
and
20 mÅ for
the equivalent width convert into an uncertainty of the combined
isotope abundance of
0.15 dex. 31 Comae is therefore still a
Li-rich giant close to the meteoritic abundance (see, e.g.,
Charbonnel & Balachandran 2000), but the start of the
Li dilution for a 2.6-
star is predicted to occur nearly
exactly at its current age (Charbonnel & Balachandran
2000). However, given the uncertainties of the tracks,
the star's subsolar metallicity, and the observational
uncertainties, we may just state that 31 Com is near the onset of
Li dilution.
5 Doppler imaging
5.1 Method and assumptions
Doppler imaging is an inverse problem that amounts to solving the
integral equation relating the surface temperature distribution to
the observed line profiles while controlling the effects of noise in
the data through a regularizing functional (e.g. Piskunov & Rice
1993). For 31 Com, we employ our new Doppler-imaging code
iMAP (Carroll et al. 2007) coupled with a data de-noising
method based on a principal component analysis (PCA) as implemented
by Carroll et al. (2009) and Kopf et al. (2009).
In this approach a set of local line profiles is decomposed into
their respective eigenspectra and an artificial neural network is
trained to approximate the non-linear mapping between atmospheric
parameters and principal components. A total of 1487 individual
spectral lines in the wavelength range 480-860 nm were used for the
de-noising of the 31 Comae time series of three selected spectral
lines; Fe I 549.7516 nm (excitation energy of 1.011 eV,
transition probability
), Fe I 641.1659 m
(3.654 eV,
), and Ca I 643.9075 nm
(2.526 eV,
). Only lines with a residual depth of
greater than 0.2 with respect to the continuum are selected.
The basic free parameter of our PCA de-noising method is the number
of principal components. No strict rule can be given for the choice
of this value but we followed the strategy laid out in Martínez
González et al. (2008). The procedure suggests 9 components
for the Fe I 549.7-nm and Ca I 643.9-nm profiles and
15 components for Fe I 641.1 nm. Blending line lists for the
three main mapping lines were extracted from VALD (see Heiter et al. 2007). The full spectrum was then synthesized in the
range from -6 to +6 Å around the line center of the three
main mapping lines using the program SPECTRUM (Gray
2000). In the case of Fe I 5497 there is a total
of 46 blends including some weak molecular lines, mostly from TiO
and VO. The inversion is performed from the central 3 Å on the
basis of a
surface grid, while the radiative
transfer calculations are done with a
grid.
A grid of model atmospheres with temperatures between
K and 6750 K in steps of 250 K and fixed
were taken from the ATLAS9 CD (Kurucz 1993). For each model
atmosphere local line profiles were computed under the assumption of
solar abundances and a microturbulence of 1.7 km s-1 according to the
analysis of Gray et al. (2001a). Note that the
model atmospheres themselves are based on a microturbulence of
2 km s-1. Gray (1989) gives a typical radial-tangential
macroturbulence velocity of 5 km s-1 for a G0 giant which we
also adopted here.
5.2 Data
STELLA observed 31 Com 37 times on 11 consecutive nights in March
10-22, 2008. Two nights were lost due to bad weather. An
integration time of 800s resulted in S/N ratios between 180-300:1 depending on atmospheric conditions and target hour angle. The PCA
line profiles reach S/N ratios of 1100:1 (gain factor of 7.5). These
spectra are phase folded with the ephemeris
where the zero epoch is arbitrary and the period is our period from the radial-velocity variations (Sect. 3.4.2) because it seems better established than the photometric periods. As for the MOST data we combined two consecutive stellar rotations under the assumption that the intrinsic stellar surface structure did not change. Although a risky assumption it is the only way to gain full phase coverage without significant phase gaps. Simulations had shown that the ambiguities in the recovery induced by phase gaps can be of much larger scale than small intrinsic changes (Rice & Strassmeier 2000). Their smearing within the line profiles due to the finite integration time is negligible for 31 Com though.
Bumps in the absorption line profiles of 31 Comae were already noticed in our few CFHT spectra in 1993 (Strassmeier et al. (1994). In 31 Com, these bumps appear two to three times weaker when compared to line profiles of spotted RS CVn stars and barely reach 1% of the continuum. This is due to the combination of the high photospheric temperature that gives less contrast to cool spots and the large line broadening that makes the profile prone to blending. Doppler imaging of 31 Com is therefore challenging.
![]() |
Figure 8:
Orthographic temperature Doppler images of 31 Com
inverted, from top to bottom, from a) the Fe I 549.7-nm
line, b) Fe I 641.1 nm, c) Ca I 643.9 nm. A
total of 1487 spectral lines were used to denoise the individual
spectral lines. The color code represents temperature as indicated.
A cool polar cap is reconstructed from all lines with an average
temperature difference with respect to the effective temperature of
1600 K. Several small warm features, also with respect to the
effective temperature, were reconstructed at low to mid-equatorial
latitudes. Due to the large inclination of the rotational axis
of |
Open with DEXTER |
5.3 Results
The error function evaluated during the inversion is defined as
![]() |
(3) |
with









Figure 8 shows the PCA reconstructed surface images from
Fe I 549.7 nm, Fe I 641.1 nm and Ca
I 643.9 nm. The line-profile fits are shown in
Fig. 9. The final images were reconstructed with a
fixed inclination of the stellar rotational axis of 80,
i.e.
close to equator-on. Such an inclination causes intrinsic problems
for Doppler imaging because the algorithm cannot uniquely decide
to which hemisphere it must assign the spots. This ``mirroring
effect'' is well known in Doppler imaging and had been documented
and simulated in the past (e.g. Vogt et al. 1987; Piskunov
& Wehlau 1994; Rice & Strassmeier 2000). We
cannot bypass it and must keep it in mind when interpreting the
images. For example, the mirroring effect would contribute to a
second polar spot and therefore allows no conclusion on whether
there is indeed a second polar spot or not. Fortunately, Doppler
images become rather insensitive to the actual choice of the
inclination once
.
![]() |
Figure 9: Line profile fits. a) for the Fe I 549.7-nm line, b) the Fe I 641.1 nm, and c) for the Ca I 643.9 nm line. The full lines are the fits and the dashed lines are the PCA-denoised observations. The numbers on the right side indicate rotational phase according to the ephemeris in Eq. (2). |
Open with DEXTER |
Surprisingly, all spectral lines are reconstructed with a cool polar
cap-like spot reaching down to mid latitudes of 60
.
Additionally, warmer features appear grouped along an equatorial
band of
30
from the equator. The polar feature appears
also structured in temperature and quite asymmetric. The features
themselves are a solid reconstruction from the data but we could not
say whether only one hemisphere has a polar spot or indeed both as
indicated. The average spot temperature is reconstructed
consistently from all spectral lines to be near 4050 K, i.e.
1600 K cooler than the stellar effective temperature. The
bright equatorial features are near 6000 K, and thus
300-400 K warmer than the effective temperature. Such a
temperature difference is significant for our mapping technique and
the given quality of the PCA spectra (Kopf et al. 2009) but
the location of the strongest of these features is located along an
isoradial line with the equatorial cool spot at phase
0
4
and therefore bears the chance to be an artifact. We note though
that the reconstruction from the strong Ca I line required a
warm spot on the same surface location where the reconstruction from
the other two lines recovered a cool spot and thus indicates that we
may have resolved a chromospheric component in Ca I.
6 Discussion
Our Doppler images recovered a large cool polar spot and several
small warm spots on the equator at the same time. The pure existence
of a large polar spot is indeed puzzling for a star of that mass and
size of the convective envelope. Because if flux tubes were located
in a sub-adiabatic layer they would surface along a Coriolis-force
dominated locus. A predicted thickness of the convective envelope of
just 20% (MESA code; Paxton et al. 2010) is simply not sufficient for a significant
deflection from radial direction. Therefore, flux tubes, if present
at all, would surface at almost exactly the same latitude where they
are being brought out of equilibrium and become buoyant (e.g.
Schüssler & Solanki 1992; Granzer et al. 2000). How they could even appear at the rotational
pole remains to be explained. This leaves us with at least two very
different interpretations. Firstly, either the flux tubes are
generated already at the poles or were swapped up to the poles by a
hypothetic, superstrong pole-ward meridional circulation (Holzwarth
et al. 2007) or, secondly, the magnetic field that makes up
the large polar cap is not of dynamo origin but of fossil origin
like in Ap stars (e.g. Mathys 2007). The mass of
2.6
and the solid argument that 31 Com was a very rapidly
rotating B9-A0 star on the main sequence favors the latter
interpretation.
Magnetic field measurements of evolved, early G giants are not only
rare but also yielded comparably low field strengths (compared to
late G giants). Hubrig et al. (1994) obtained a mean
longitudinal component of the magnetic field of G on one
night for the G1II bright giant
Leo, while Plachinda
(2005) obtained no statistically significant field strengths
at all for
Aqr (G2Ib) and
Aqr (G0Ib). Just
recently, Auriére et al. (2008) measured a mean longitudinal
field strength of between 20-100 G on the single G8 subgiant
HR 1362 = EK Eri. They infer a mean surface magnetic field of 270 G
from this. Although also a (late) G giant, EK Eri is different from
31 Com because it is significantly less massive and it has already
arrived at the end of the Hertzsprung gap where it became a very
slow rotator now with a period of possibly 618 days (Dall et al. 2010). Nevertheless, the large-scale magnetic field was
found to be dominated by a poloidal component, which is at least
suggestive that this also may be the case for 31 Com.
A fossil magnetic field in the pre-main sequence stage has likely a
decisive impact on the overall angular momentum with which the star
appears on the ZAMS. Numerical simulations of pre main-sequence A
stars show that the shrinking convective envelope pushes its
magnetic field into the radiative core by turbulent pumping (e.g.
Arlt 2009).
At that time the magnetic quadrupole and
non-axisymmetric modes already dominate the total magnetic energy.
The field is then expected to enforce internal rigid rotation and
the accompanying angular momentum rearrangement eventually leads to
a rapidly rotating surface and a dredge up of, e.g., fresh lithium.
This scenario is backed up by the observation that Li-rich early
F giants are usually also rapidly rotating (Jasniewicz et al.
2006). When the star evolves across the Hertzsprung gap it
will again develop a convective envelope and then start to dilute
its surface lithium, as is also backed up by observations
(de Laverny et al. 2003). To explain the Li dip, e.g.,
in the Hyades F dwarfs, Böhm-Vitense (2004) invokes a deep
mixing process while the increase of the Li dip with age is
suggested to be due to the decay of the fossil field. Recent
measurements of the magnetic field of Ap stars in open clusters
showed rms fields larger than about 1kG only when they are near the
ZAMS (Landstreet et al. 2008). The time scale on which these
large fields disappear varies strongly with mass, but was found to
be about 250 Myr for 2-3
stars. It supports the picture
that 31 Com was already a magnetic star when on the main sequence.
On the contrary, for the Sun we have abundant evidence that the
surface magnetic field and Ca II, UV and X-ray emission are
all well correlated (see Schrijver & Zwaan 2000, and
references therein). The observation of X-ray emission and UV
emission lines usually indicates a magnetically active star powered
by a classical
interface dynamo. As 31 Com is a
strong X-ray emitter with coronal loops peaking at a temperature
near 107 K (Scelsi et al. 2004) and with super rotationally
broadened UV lines suggesting transient explosive activity in the
chromosphere and transition region (Ayres et al. 2007), the
question appears how could these be provided by a fossil
predominantly poloidal magnetic field?
The Rossby number,
,
has been accepted as
indicating the efficiency of a classical dynamo, its convective
turn-over time,
,
remains an elusive parameter though. It
describes the ratio of a characteristic length of convection to a
characteristic velocity,
,
and is either determined
theoretically (e.g. Kim & Demarque 1996) or
semi-empirically (e.g. Pizzolato et al. 2003). For 31 Com
it was given by Gondoin (2005) as 50 days based on
evolutionary calculations for a 2.2-
star with an
effective temperature of 5320 K. Thus, much longer than the
rotational period measured. It would give a Rossby number of 0.13
and, according to the criterium of Durney & Latour
(1978), be by far sufficient to run an effective dynamo.
We use the differential-rotation code of Küker & Stix
(2001) to recompute
as a function of depth
based on its description through the pressure scale height,
,
and the classical mixing length,
.
The characteristic
convective length is defined as
,
with
.
In the case of a fast rotator, the convective heat flux is
no longer aligned with the temperature gradient and tilts towards
the rotational axis. It then creates a horizontal heat flux from
the equator to the poles (Küker & Rüdiger 2008).
Figure 10
shows the turn-over time for 31 Com plotted
versus the fractional stellar radius. The depth of the convection
zone for a rotating 5660-K giant is predicted to be 20% of the
stellar radius and the average turn-over time approximately five
days. The Rossby number is then above or near unity and an efficient
dynamo would not be expected. We note that if 31 Com were a much
slower rotator, say with a period of 700 days, the average
turn-over time would be longer by approximately a factor two.
![]() |
Figure 10:
The convective turn-over time,
|
Open with DEXTER |
The puzzle can be resolved naturally when we assume that both types
of magnetic field are present at the same time, i.e. a fossil,
predominantly axisymmetric poloidal, field and a dynamo-generated,
presumably non-axisymmetric equatorial, field. Then, the fossil
field could be linked to the cool polar spot while the
dynamo-generated field, based on a classical advection-driven dynamo
in the convective envelope, would cause the equatorial warm spots
and also the loops hosting the bulk of UV and X-ray emission. One
could further speculate that the convective core of 31 Com also runs
a dynamo and that it interacts with the fossil field that resides in
the radiative zone between the (convective) core and the shallow
surface convection layer. Just recently, Featherstone et al.
(2009) has demonstrated that the existence of a fossil
field may induce a core dynamo to transit to such a strong-field
dynamo at the edge of the convection zone. The induced field
strengths may even be strong enough to cause flux emergence to the
surface and then possibly may explain the observed polar spot. Such
a spot could even manifest a new species in the zoo of starspots,
not directly related to sunspots anymore (for a comparison see,
e.g., Strassmeier 2009). The role of the magneto rotational
instability and its relation to meridional circulation and
differential rotation is yet to be considered and understood though
and any conclusions just preliminary (see, e.g., Küker
2009).
7 Summary and conclusions
We have obtained the rotation period and other astrophysical
parameters of the active G0 Hertzsprung-gap giant 31 Comae. The star
appears to have just started its rotational braking phase towards
the RGB. The rotation period of a Hertzsprung-gap giant constitutes
an important constraint for models of the evolution of the angular
momentum, the internal differential rotation and in particular for
the mixing processes of light elements below the photosphere. It is
also a crucial ingredient enabling Doppler imaging of stellar
surface structure from spectral line profiles.
We conducted and analyzed photometric measurements from an 11-day
campaign with the MOST satellite and found, for the first time,
clear photometric variations with a likely period of either 3.38
days or
days. This period is confirmed by our
ground-based APT Strömgren data despite its significance alone
being questionable due to the very small amplitudes at the mmag
level. Precise radial velocities from high-resolution echelle
spectra were acquired over the course of two years with the STELLA
robotic telescope as an independent data source. This revealed
radial velocity variations with a period of
days and a
full amplitude of 270 m s-1 that we interpret to be the rotation
period of the star. Together with the 6.80-day MOST white-light
period and the
7.0-day APT photometric period, we are
confident that we have found the true stellar rotation period. No
other long-term velocity variations above the external precision of
our spectra of
100 m s-1 (rms) were detected and we conclude
that the star is indeed single.
Our Doppler images recovered a large cool polar spot. This is puzzling because, at the given location of 31 Com in the H-R diagram, the predicted depth of the convective envelope is less than 20% of the stellar radius. Such a thin layer does not provide the volume to deflect flux tubes from an equatorial or mid-latitude sub-adiabatic layer beneath the convective envelope to the polar surface, according to models by, e.g., Schüssler & Solanki (1992). We suggest that the underlying magnetic field near the rotational poles is not of a classical, envelope-dynamo origin but is of fossil origin and thus a remnant of a strong magnetic field from the star's main sequence years. It implies that we have mapped the atmospheric interaction with an axisymmetric poloidal component of this fossil magnetic field, resembling a dipole aligned with the rotational axis. Alternatively, the surface field at the poles could be made up of flux tubes that stem from a core dynamo that interacted with the fossil field and then got strong enough to become buoyant and traversed a much larger region of the star. On the contrary, the small and warmer features observed at equatorial latitudes are likely faculae as we know them from the solar analogy, suggesting a classical envelope-dynamo origin. It must be these faculae that also dominated the white light curve of our MOST photometry. We suggest that these faculae, together with the UV and X-ray emission, are caused by a classical envelope-interface dynamo that is predominantly bound to low-latitude regions.
AcknowledgementsK.G.S. and the AIP coauthors are grateful to the State of Brandenburg and the German federal ministry for education and research (BMBF) for their continuous support of the STELLA and APT activities. It is our pleasure to thank Sydney Barnes and Yong-Cheol Kim for computing the moment-of-inertia models for us. We particularly thank our anonymous referee whose comments resulted in a much improved paper. J.B.R., J.M.M., D.B.G., A.F.J.M., and S.M.R. are supported by funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Canada. R.K. is funded by the Canadian Space Agency. W.W.W. is supported by the Austrian Science Promotion Agency (FFG-MOST) and the Austrian Science Funds (FWF-P17580). The APT operation has been supported by grants from the FWF to M. Breger and KGS. This work has made use of BaSTI web tools, the MESA code and of the many CDS-Strasbourg services.
References
- Allende-Prieto, C. 2004, AN, 325, 604 [Google Scholar]
- Allende-Prieto, C., Beers, T. C., Wilhelm, R., et al. 2006, ApJ, 636, 804 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Arlt, R. 2009, in Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Stars and Galaxies (Cambridge University Press), IAU Symp., 259, 443 [Google Scholar]
- Auriére, M., Konstantinova-Antova, R., Petit, P., et al. 2008, A&A, 491, 499 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Ayres, T. R., & Linsky, J. E. 1980, ApJ, 241, 279 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ayres, T. R., Simon, T., Stern, R. A., et al. 1998, ApJ, 496, 428 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ayres, T. R., Hodges-Kluck, E., & Brown, A. 2007, ApJS, 171, 304 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barnes, S. A. 2003, ApJ, 586, 464 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bell, R. A., & Gustafsson, B. 1989, MNRAS, 236, 653 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bernacca, P. L. 1973, Contr. Oss. Astr. Univ. Padova Asiago, No. 294 [Google Scholar]
- Böhm-Vitense, E. 2004, AJ, 128, 2435 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bopp, B. W., & Stencel, R. E. 1981, ApJ, 247, 131 [Google Scholar]
- Bopp, B. W., Dempsey, R. C., & Maniak, S. 1988, ApJS, 68, 803 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bounatiro, L. 1993, A&AS, 100, 531 [Google Scholar]
- Breger, M., Stich, J., Garrido, R., et al. 1993, A&A, 271, 482 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Carroll, T. A., Kopf, M., Ilyin, I., & Strassmeier, K. G. 2007, AN, 328, 1043 [Google Scholar]
- Carroll, T. A., Kopf, M., Strassmeier, K. G., & Ilyin, I. 2009, in Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Stars and Galaxies (Cambridge University Press), IAU Symp., 259, 633 [Google Scholar]
- Casewell, S. L., Jameson, R. F., & Dobbie, P. D. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 447 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonnel, C., & Balachandran, S. C. 2000, A&A, 359, 563 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Dall, T. H., Bruntt, H., Stello, D., & Strassmeier, K. G. 2010, A&A, 514, A25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Demarque, P., Guenther, D. B., Li, L. H., Mazumdar, A., & Straka, C. W. 2008, Ap&SS, 316, 31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- de Laverny, P., do Nascimento, J. D., Jr., Lébre, A., & De Medeiros, J. R. 2003, A&A, 410, 937 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- De Medeiros, J. R., & Mayor, M. 1999, A&AS, 139, 433 [Google Scholar]
- De Medeiros, J. R., do Nascimento, J. D., Sankarankutty, S., Costa, J. M., & Maia, M. R. G. 2000, A&A, 363, 239 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Dreizler, S., Reiners, A., Homeier, D., & Noll, M. 2009, A&A, 499, 615 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Durney, B. R., & Latour, J. 1978, Geophys. Ap. Fluid Dynamics, 9, 241 [Google Scholar]
- ESA 1997, The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues, ESA SP, 1200 [Google Scholar]
- Featherstone, N. A., Browning, M. K., Brun, A. S., & Toomre, J. 2009, ApJ, 705, 1000 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Flower, P. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 355 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fröhlich, C. 2009, A&A, 501, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Gondoin, P. 1999, A&A, 352, 217 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Gondoin, P. 2005, A&A, 444, 531 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Gontcharov, G. A. 2006, Astron. Lett., 32, 759 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Granzer, T., Schüssler, M., Caligari, P., & Strassmeier, K. G. 2000, A&A, 355, 1087 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Granzer, T., Reegen, P., & Strassmeier, K. G. 2001, AN, 322, 325 [Google Scholar]
- Gray, D. F. 1989, ApJ, 347, 1021 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gray, D. F. 1992, The observation and analysis of stellar photospheres, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
- Gray, R. O. 2000 http://www.phys.appstate.edu/spectrum [Google Scholar]
- Gray, R. O., Napier, M. G., & Winkler, L. I. 2001a, AJ, 121, 2148 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gray, R. O., Graham, P. W., & Hoyt, S. R. 2001b, AJ, 121, 2159 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hagen, W., & Stencel, R. E. 1985, AJ, 90, 120 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Harris, D. L., & Upgren, A. R. 1964, ApJ, 140, 151 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hatzes, A. P. 2002, AN, 323, 392 [Google Scholar]
- Heiter, U., Barklem, P., Fossati, L., et al. 2008, J. Phys., Conf. Ser., 130, 1, 012011 [Google Scholar]
- Holmberg, J., Nordstroem, B., & Andersen, J. 2007, A&A, 475, 519 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Holmberg, J., Nordstroem, B., & Andersen, J. 2009, A&A, 501, 941 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Holzwarth, V., Mackay, D. H., & Jardine, M. 2007, AN, 328, 1108 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Huerta, M., Johns-Krull, C. M., Prato, L., Hartigan, P., & Jaffe, D. T. 2008, ApJ, 678, 472 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Huber, K. F., Wolter, U., Czesla, S., et al. 2009, A&A, 501, 715 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Hubrig, S., Plachinda, S. I., Hünsch, M., & Schröder, K.-P. 1994, A&A, 291, 890 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Hünsch, M., Schmitt, J. H. M. M., & Voges, W. 1998, A&AS, 127, 251 [Google Scholar]
- Jasniewicz, G., Recio-Blanco, A., de Laverny, P., Parthasarathy, M., & de Medeiros, J. R. 2006, A&A, 453, 717 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Kazarovets, E. V., Kireeva, N. N., Samus, N. N., & Durlevich, O. V. 2003, IBVS 5422 [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.-C., & Demarque, P. 1996, ApJ, 457, 340 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.-C., & Barnes, S. A. 2008, in The Art of Modeling Stars in the 21st Century (Cambridge Univ. Press), IAU Symp., 252, 117 [Google Scholar]
- Kopf, M., Carroll, T. A., & Strassmeier, K. G. 2009, in Solar Polarization 5: In Honor of Jan Stenflo, ed. Berdyugina, S. V., Nagendra, K. N., & Ramelli, R., ASP Conf. Ser., 405, 535 [Google Scholar]
- Korhonen, H., Berdyugina, S. V., Hackman, T., et al. 1999, A&A, 346, 101 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Korhonen, H., Berdyugina, S. V., Hackman, T., Strassmeier, K. G., & Tuominen, I. 2000, A&A, 360, 1067 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Korhonen, H., Berdyugina, S. V., Tuominen, I., et al. 2001, A&A, 374, 1049 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Korhonen, H., Hubrig, S., Berdyugina, S. V., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 282 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Küker, M. 2009, in Proc. of the 15th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems and the Sun, AIP Conf. Proc., 1094, 77 [Google Scholar]
- Küker, M., & Stix, M. 2001, A&A, 366, 668 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Küker, M., & Rüdiger, G. 2008, in J. Phys., Conf. Ser., 118, 1, 012029 [Google Scholar]
- Kurucz, R. L. 1993, ATLAS-9, CD-ROM #13 [Google Scholar]
- Lafler, J., & Kinman, T. D. 1965, ApJS, 11, 216 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Landstreet, J. D., Silaj, J., Andretta, V., et al. 2008, A&A, 481, 465 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Lockwood, G. W., Skiff, B. A., & Thompson, D. T. 1993, in Stellar Photometry - Current Techniques and Future Developments, ed. C. J. Butler, & J. Elliott, IAU Coll. 136 (Cambridge Univ. Press), 99 [Google Scholar]
- Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap. Space Sci., 39, 447 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Madsen, S., Dravins, D., & Lindegren, L. 2002, A&A, 381, 446 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Martínez González, M. J., Asensio Ramos, A., Carroll, T. A., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 637 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Mathys, G. 2007, Highlights of Astronomy, 14, 285 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- McLaughlin, D. B. 1924, ApJ, 60, 22 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- de Medeiros, J. R., & Mayor, M. 1999, A&AS, 139, 433 [Google Scholar]
- Mermilliod, J.-C., Grenon, M., & Mayor, M. 2008, A&A, 491, 951 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Moffett, T. J., & Barnes III., T. G. 1979, PASP, 91, 180 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nicolet, B. 1978, A&AS, 34, 1 [Google Scholar]
- Odenkirchen, M., Soubiran, C., & Colin, J. 1998, New Astron., 3, 583 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pavlenko, Ya. V., & Magazzú, A. 1996, A&A, 311, 961 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Paxton, W. et al. 2010, Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) http://mesa.sourceforge.ne [Google Scholar]
- Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M., & Castelli, F. 2004, ApJ, 612, 168 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Piskunov, N. E., & Rice, J. B. 1993, PASP, 105, 1415 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Piskunov, N. E., & Wehlau, W. H. 1994, A&A, 289, 868 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Pizzolato, N., Maggio, A., Micela, G., Sciortino, S., & Ventura, P. 2003, A&A, 397, 147 [Google Scholar]
- Plachinda, S. I. 2005, Astrophys., 48, 1, 9 [Google Scholar]
- Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. 2002, Numerical Recipes, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
- Reegen, P. 2004, in Second Eddington Workshop: Stellar structure and habitable planet finding, ed. F. Favata, S. Aigrain, & A. Wilson, ESA SP, 583, 389 [Google Scholar]
- Reegen, P. 2007, A&A, 467, 1353 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Reegen, P., Kallinger, T., Frast, D., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1414 [Google Scholar]
- Reiners, A. 2006, A&A, 446, 267 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Rice, J. B., & Strassmeier, K. G. 2000, A&AS, 147, 151 [Google Scholar]
- Richichi, A., Percheron, I., & Khristoforova, M. 2005, A&A, 431, 773 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, D. H., Lehar, J., & Dreher, J. W. 1987, AJ, 93, 968 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rossiter, R. A. 1924, ApJ, 60, 15 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rowe, J. F. 2006, ApJ, 646, 1241 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Saar, S. H., & Donahue, R. A. 1997, ApJ, 485, 319 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Saar, S. H., Huovelin, J., Osten, R. A., & Shcherbakov, A. G. 1997, A&A, 326, 741 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Scelsi, L., Maggio, A., Peres, G., & Gondoin, P. 2004, A&A, 413, 643 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Schrijver, C. J., & Zwaan, C. 2000, Solar and stellar magnetic aczivity (Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
- Schüssler, M., & Solanki, S. K. 1992, A&A, 264, L13 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Simon, T. 1984, ApJ, 279, 738 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Simon, T. 1986, AJ, 91, 1233 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Simon, T., & Drake, S. A. 1989, ApJ, 346, 303 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Skumanich, A. 1972, ApJ, 171, 565 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stellingwerf, R. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 953 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G. 2009, A&ARv, 17, 251 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., & Hall, D. S. 1988, ApJS, 67, 439 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., & Oláh, K. 2004, in Second Eddington Workshop: Stellar structure and habitable planet finding, ed. F. Favata, S. Aigrain, & A. Wilson, ESA SP, 583, 149 [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Fekel, F. C., Bopp, B. W., Dempsey, R. C., & Henry, G. W. 1990, ApJS, 72, 191 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Washüttl, A., & Rice, J. B. 1994, IBVS, 3994 [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Bartus, J., Cutispoto, G., & Rodonó, M. 1997a, A&AS, 125, 11 [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Boyd, L. J., Epand, D. H., & Granzer, T. 1997b, PASP, 109, 697 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Serkowitsch, E., & Granzer, T. 1999, A&AS, 140, 29 [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Reegen, P., & Granzer, T. 2001, AN, 322, 325 [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Granzer, T., Weber, M., et al. 2004, AN, 325, 527 [Google Scholar]
- Strassmeier, K. G., Weber, M., Granzer, T., & Dall, T. H. 2010, AN, 331, 368 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- van Leeuwen, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 653 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Vogt, S. S., Penrod, G. D., & Hatzes, A. P. 1987, ApJ, 321, 496 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Walker, G., Matthews, J., Kuschnig, R., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 1023 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wallerstein, G., Böhm-Vitense, E., Vanture, A. D., & Gonzalez, G. 1994, AJ, 107, 2211 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Weber, M., Granzer, T., Strassmeier, K. G., & Woche, M. 2008, Proc. SPIE, 7019, 70190L [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wittkowski, M., Schöller, M., Hubrig, S., Posselt, B., & von der Lühe, O. 2002, AN, 323, 241 [Google Scholar]
Footnotes
- ...
31 Comae
- Based on data obtained with the MOST satellite, a Canadian Space Agency mission, operated jointly by Dynacon, Inc., and the Universities of Toronto and British Columbia, with assistance from the University of Vienna; the STELLA robotic telescope in Tenerife, an AIP facility jointly operated by AIP and IAC, and the Vienna Automatic Photoelectric Telescopes in Arizona, jointly operated by the University of Vienna and AIP.
- ...
- Full Tables 2 and 3 are only available in electronic form at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/520/A52
- ... giants
- The same is true for disk-integrated white-light data of the Sun, as demonstrated, e.g., from the ACRIM data by Strassmeier & Oláh (2004).
- ... Sun
- For stars later than
F5, Gray et al. (2001a)
suggested corrections to
the values listed in their Table 1 for
of +0.12, for [Fe/H] of +0.06 dex, and for microturbulence of -0.5 km s-1, which has been applied here.
- ... code
- http://mesa.sourceforge.ne
All Tables
Table 1: Summary of new observations in this paper.
Table 2: Barycentric STELLA radial velocities.
Table 3: KPNO radial velocities.
Table 4: Best-fit periods in days from the MOST observations, the four APT T6 data sets, and the STELLA radial velocities.
Table 5: Astrophysical properties of 31 Comae.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1: MOST photometry of 31 Com in March 2007. a) Light curve for a continuous 11-day run ( top panel) and of a fainter comparison star ( lower panel; HD 112152, A3V; unbinned data are shown as grey-scale dots, binned data as black dots). The abscissa is in fractional days from JD 2 451 545 and the magnitudes are MOST instrumental magnitudes. b) DFT periodogram from the MOST data. The full line is 31 Com, the dashed line is for the comparison star HD 112152. The abscissa is in units of cycles per day. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Periodograms for the MOST data with a) the
Lomb-Scargle algorithm, b) the Phase-Dispersion Minimization
(PDM), and c) a statistical treatment of the Discrete Fourier
Transform (DFT) as formulated by Reegen (2007). The DFT
amplitude, A, in mmag (top curve), is shown on the right ordinate
(inverted) and its significance,
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3: Significance spectra of the APT light curves. From top to bottom: b 1996, y 1996, v 2002, y 2002. Note that the amplitude scale for 1996 and 2002 are different. For each frequency, f, the significance of this frequency and 12 integer multiples are added up, returning the False-Alarm Probability for the fundamental and harmonics simultaneously, thus taking into account the expected non-sinusoidal photometric variation invoked by the rotating surface. The length of the pins referred to the right (inverted) ordinate and represent the best-fitting frequencies (Eq. (1)) and the individual amplitudes of all 12 harmonics. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4: Phased light curves. a) The MOST light curve from 2007. Shown are the light curves phased with the 6.80-day ( bottom) and the 3.38-day period ( top). b) Our best-sampled APT light curve with a period of 7.045 days (data set APT b 1996 in Table 4). The zero phase is arbitrary. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5: STELLA radial velocities from the 2007/2008 observing season. a) CLEAN periodogram; b) phased radial-velocity curve. None of the four periodogram algorithms, CLEAN, L-S, PDM, and DFT, showed a statistically truly significant peak. However, a bootstrapping procedure identifies the f = 0.148 c/d peak as the most solid frequency. This peak is then used as a starting value for a least-square minimization of a purely harmonic function and results in the best-fit period of 6.761 d. The sinusoidal peak-to-peak amplitude is 270 m s-1. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6:
Portions of five echelle orders from STELLA used to derive the
photospheric parameters for 31 Com. The thin line is the data
and the thick line is our synthetic-spectrum fit with PARSES. Note
the ``misfit'' for the He I 587.56-nm line (total line
equivalent width
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 7:
31 Comae in the H-R diagram
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 8:
Orthographic temperature Doppler images of 31 Com
inverted, from top to bottom, from a) the Fe I 549.7-nm
line, b) Fe I 641.1 nm, c) Ca I 643.9 nm. A
total of 1487 spectral lines were used to denoise the individual
spectral lines. The color code represents temperature as indicated.
A cool polar cap is reconstructed from all lines with an average
temperature difference with respect to the effective temperature of
1600 K. Several small warm features, also with respect to the
effective temperature, were reconstructed at low to mid-equatorial
latitudes. Due to the large inclination of the rotational axis
of |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 9: Line profile fits. a) for the Fe I 549.7-nm line, b) the Fe I 641.1 nm, and c) for the Ca I 643.9 nm line. The full lines are the fits and the dashed lines are the PCA-denoised observations. The numbers on the right side indicate rotational phase according to the ephemeris in Eq. (2). |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 10:
The convective turn-over time,
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.