Free Access

 

 

Table 3:

Column density in units of $10^{22}~\rm cm^{-2}$for the six observations and the sine fit, obtained with different continuum models.

Observation or fit
X2 S1 S3 C1 S2 X1 Sine fit
$\phi _{\rm orb}^{\rm (T3)}$ 0.17-0.28 0.37-0.42 0.43-0.50 0.45-0.51 0.49-0.61 0.94-0.96 full orbit
diskbb + powerlaw* $\left(2.00^{+0.17}_{-0.19}\right)$* $\left(1.2^{+0.5}_{-0.2}\right)$* $\rm0.96^{+0.03}_{-0.02}$ $\left(1.25^{+0.04}_{-0.01}\right)$* $1.031\pm0.017$ $\left(1.81^{+0.06}_{-0.05}\right)$* $\left(1.43\pm0.43\right)$*
eqpair $1.279\pm0.005$ $\rm 1.17^{+0.15}_{-0.10}$ $1.02\pm0.02$ $\rm 1.065^{+0.000}_{-0.019}$ $1.088\pm0.017$ $\rm 1.191^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$ $1.15\pm0.15$
simpl(kerrbb) $1.278\pm0.005$ $\rm 1.17^{+0.11}_{-0.10}$ $\rm 1.01^{+0.03}_{-0.02}$ $\rm 1.085^{+0.018}_{-0.016}$ $1.088\pm0.017$ $\rm 1.187^{+0.014}_{-0.012}$ $1.15\pm0.14$
simpl(diskbb) $1.288\pm0.016$$^{\dagger}$ $\rm 1.14^{+0.15}_{-0.11}$ $0.97\pm0.02$ $\rm 1.009^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ $1.038\pm0.017$ $\rm 1.133^{+0.005}_{-0.004}$ $1.10\pm0.18$

Notes. Quoted errors are statistical uncertainties at the 90% confidence level for the observations, but semi-amplitudes for the sine fits.
(*) The diskbb + powerlaw model overestimates $N_{\rm H}$ more, the more the powerlaw contributes at low energies, see text.
$^{(\dagger)}$ As the lack of data above 2 keV did not allow us to constrain the power law with the simpl model, we only used diskbb.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.