| Issue |
A&A
Volume 708, April 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A372 | |
| Number of page(s) | 17 | |
| Section | Planets, planetary systems, and small bodies | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202558332 | |
| Published online | 27 April 2026 | |
A simulation study of detecting exomoons using the Earth 2.0 (ET) mission
1
School of Physics and Astronomy, Sun Yat-sen University,
Zhuhai
519082,
China
2
CSST Science Center for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Great Bay Area, Sun Yat-sen University,
Zhuhai
519082,
China
3
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shanghai
200030,
China
★ Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
1
December
2025
Accepted:
14
March
2026
Abstract
We investigate the feasibility of detecting exomoon candidates using the Earth 2.0 (ET) mission, a space-based telescope designed for detecting Earth-like planets using high-precision photometry. We employed a photodynamical simulation framework to model both three-body star-planet-moon systems and two-body star-planet systems, generating synthetic light curves for a variety of exomoon configurations under the assumption of idealized white-noise-dominated observations. These light curves were analyzed using the PyTransit package to extract key transit parameters, including mid-transit times, transit depths, and transit durations. We then assessed exomoon detectability by comparing the metrics from three-body systems with two-body models, focusing on transit timing variations (TTVs). When the TTVs from the two models are statistically distinguishable, we are able to conclude that the exomoon signal is detectable. Our results show that, in this idealized noise regime, while the detection probabilities for Galilean-like exomoons are very low, larger exomoons with short orbital periods around gas giants exhibit significantly higher detection probabilities. In particular, our simulations demonstrate that ET could detect exomoon candidates similar to the well-known exomoon candidate around Kepler-1625 b. While we also investigate the use of transit duration variations (TDVs), transit radius variations (TRVs), flat-bottomed transit duration variations (TFVs), and impact parameter variations (TbVs), TTVs remain the most effective method. These findings highlight the potential of the ET mission to detect exomoon candidates, with its high photometric precision enabling the identification of subtle dynamical signatures induced by the existence of exomoons orbiting exoplanets. We emphasize, however, that these results represent the theoretical best-case performance, as stellar variability, instrumental systematics, and other unknown noise sources are not included in this analysis. The simulated ET exomoon light curve dataset will also be made publicly available to the community.
Key words: methods: numerical / techniques: photometric / planets and satellites: detection / planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability / planets and satellites: general
© The Authors 2026
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.