Issue |
A&A
Volume 696, April 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A144 | |
Number of page(s) | 20 | |
Section | Interstellar and circumstellar matter | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202453409 | |
Published online | 14 April 2025 |
Fast spectral line calculations with the escape probability method and tests using synthetic observations of interstellar clouds
Department of Physics,
PO Box 64, 00014, University of Helsinki,
Finland
★ Corresponding author; mika.juvela@helsinki.fi
Received:
12
December
2024
Accepted:
10
March
2025
Context. Radiative transfer (RT) effects need to be taken into account when analysing spectral line observations. When the data are not sufficient for detailed modelling, simpler methods are needed. The escape probability formalism (EPF) is one such tool.
Aims. We wish to quantify the model errors in the EPF analysis of interstellar clouds and cores.
Methods. We introduce PEP, a parallel programme for calculating fast EPF parameters quickly. We modelled a full RT to generate synthetic observations for various cloud models. We examined these with the PEP programme, comparing these results to the actual beam-averaged kinetic temperatures, column densities, and volume densities.
Results. PEP enables the calculation of even millions of parameter combinations in a matter of seconds. However, the simple assumptions of EPF can lead to significant errors. In these tests, the errors were typically within a factor of 2, but could (in some cases) rise to one full order of magnitude. The model errors are thus similar or even larger than the statistical errors caused by the typical observational noise. Due to degeneracies, the parameter combinations were shown to be better constrained than the individual parameters. The model errors could be reduced by using full radiative transfer modelling. However, in the absence of full knowledge of the source structure, the errors are difficult to quantify. We also present a method for approximate handling of hyperfine structure lines in EPF calculations.
Conclusions. Both the observational statistical errors and the model errors need to be considered when estimating the reliability of EPF results. Full RT modelling is needed to better understand the true uncertainties.
Key words: line: formation / radiative transfer / methods: numerical / techniques: spectroscopic / ISM: clouds / ISM: molecules
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.