Issue |
A&A
Volume 693, January 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | L7 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Letters to the Editor | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452783 | |
Published online | 03 January 2025 |
Letter to the Editor
Giant exoplanet composition
The impact of the hydrogen–helium equation of state and interior structure
Institut für Astrophysik, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstr. 190, CH8057 Zurich, Switzerland
⋆ Corresponding author; saburo.howard@uzh.ch
Received:
28
October
2024
Accepted:
4
December
2024
Context. Revealing the internal composition and structure of giant planets is fundamental for understanding planetary formation. However, the bulk composition can only be inferred through interior models. As a result, advancements in modelling aspects are essential to better characterise the interiors of giant planets.
Aims. We investigate the effects of model assumptions such as the interior structure and the hydrogen–helium (H–He) equation of state (EOS) on the inferred interiors of giant exoplanets.
Methods. We first assessed these effects on a few test cases and compared H–He EOSs. We then calculated evolution models and inferred the planetary bulk metallicity of 45 warm exoplanets, ranging from 0.1 to 10 MJ.
Results. Planets with masses between about 0.2 and 0.6 MJ are most sensitive to the H–He EOS. Using a H–He EOS that properly models the warm dense matter regime reduces the inferred heavy-element mass, with an absolute difference in bulk metallicity of up to 13%. Concentrating heavy elements in a core, rather than distributing them uniformly (and scaling opacities with metallicity), reduces the inferred metallicity (up to 17%). The assumed internal structure, along with its effect on the envelope opacity, has the greatest effect on the inferred composition of massive planets (Mp > 4 MJ). For Mp > 0.6 MJ, the observational uncertainties on radii and ages lead to uncertainties in the inferred metallicity (up to 31%) that are larger than the ones associated with the used H–He EOS and the assumed interior structure. However, for planets with 0.2 < Mp < 0.6 MJ, the theoretical uncertainties are larger.
Conclusions. Advancements in EOSs and our understanding of giant planet interior structures combined with accurate measurements of the planetary radius and age are crucial for characterising giant exoplanets.
Key words: planets and satellites: composition / planets and satellites: gaseous planets / planets and satellites: interiors
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.