Issue |
A&A
Volume 692, December 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A139 | |
Number of page(s) | 10 | |
Section | Numerical methods and codes | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452012 | |
Published online | 06 December 2024 |
Implementation of thermal conduction energy transfer models in the Bifrost solar atmosphere MHD code
1
Rosseland Centre for Solar physics, Universitetet i Oslo,
Sem Sælands vei 13,
0371
Oslo,
Norway
2
Institutt for Teoretisk Astrofysikk, Universitetet i Oslo,
Sem Sælands vei 13,
0371
Oslo,
Norway
★ Corresponding author; georgche@uio.no
Received:
27
August
2024
Accepted:
13
October
2024
Context. Thermal conductivity provides important contributions to the energy evolution of the upper solar atmosphere, behaving as a non-linear concentration-dependent diffusion equation. Recently, different methods have been offered as best-fit solutions to these problems in specific situations, but their effectiveness and limitations are rarely discussed.
Aims. We have rigorously tested the different implementations of solving the conductivity flux, in the massively parallel magnetohydrodynamics code, Bifrost, with the aim of specifying the best scenarios for the use of each method.
Methods. We compared the differences and limitations of explicit versus implicit methods, and analyse the convergence of a hyperbolic approximation. Among the tests, we used a newly derived first-order self-similar approximation to compare the efficacy of each method analytically in a 1D pure-thermal test scenario.
Results. We find that although the hyperbolic approximation proves the most accurate and the fastest to compute in long-running simulations, there is no optimal method to calculate the mid-term conductivity with both accuracy and efficiency. We also find that the solution of this approximation is sensitive to the initial conditions, and can lead to faster convergence if used correctly. Hyperdiffusivity is particularly useful in aiding the methods to perform optimally.
Conclusions. We discuss recommendations for the use of each method within more complex simulations, whilst acknowledging the areas where there are opportunities for new methods to be developed.
Key words: conduction / diffusion / magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) / methods: analytical / methods: numerical / Sun: corona
© The Authors 2024
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.