Issue |
A&A
Volume 692, December 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A8 | |
Number of page(s) | 10 | |
Section | Planets, planetary systems, and small bodies | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451784 | |
Published online | 27 November 2024 |
Assessing methods for telluric removal on atmospheric retrievals of high-resolution optical exoplanetary transmission spectra
1
School of Physics, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin,
Dublin 2,
Ireland
2
European Southern Observatory,
Alonso de Córdova 3107,
Santiago,
Chile
3
INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri,
Largo Enrico Fermi 5,
50125
Firenze,
Italy
★ Corresponding author; maguic10@tcd.ie
Received:
3
August
2024
Accepted:
16
October
2024
Context. Recent advancements in ultra-stable ground-based high-resolution spectrographs have propelled ground-based astronomy to the forefront of exoplanet detection and characterisation. However, the resultant transmission and emission spectra of exoplanetary atmospheres are inevitably contaminated by telluric absorption and emission lines due to the light’s transmission through the Earth’s atmosphere above the observatory. Retrieving accurate atmospheric parameters depends on accurate modelling and removal of this telluric contamination while preserving the faint underlying exoplanet signal.
Aims. There exist many methods to model telluric contamination, whether directly modelling the Earth’s transmission spectrum via radiative transfer modelling, or using a principal component analysis (PCA)-like reconstruction to fit the time-invariant features of a spectrum, and removing these models from the observations. We aimed to assess the efficacy of these various telluric removal methods in preserving the underlying exoplanetary spectra.
Methods. We compared two of the most common telluric modelling and removal methods, MOLECFIT and the PCA-like algorithm SYSREM, using planetary transmission spectra injected into three high-resolution optical observations taken with ESPRESSO. These planetary signals were injected at orbital periods of P =2 days and P = 12 days, resulting in differing changes in radial velocity during transit. We then retrieved various injected atmospheric model parameters in order to determine the efficacy of the telluric removal methods, as well as their effect on the transmission spectra of exoplanets with varying orbital architectures.
Results. For the close-in, high velocity injected signal, we found that SYSREM performed better for species that are also present in the Earth’s atmosphere-with accurate and precise retrieval of atmospheric abundances and T-P profiles, across each of the datasets. As we moved to slower moving signals at larger orbital separations, for one of the three datasets, SYSREM dampened the planetary H2O signal, leaving the retrieved abundance value unconstrained. In contrast, the H2O signal was preserved for the telluric modelling method, MOLECFIT. However, this behaviour was not ubiquitous across all three of the injected datasets, with another dataset showing a more precise H2O/Fe ratio when preprocessed with SYSREM. These conflicts highlight the importance of testing individual high-resolution dataset reduction routines independently to ensure real exoplanetary signals are preserved.
Key words: atmospheric effects / methods: data analysis / techniques: spectroscopic / planets and satellites: atmospheres / planets and satellites: composition
© The Authors 2024
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.