Issue |
A&A
Volume 687, July 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A150 | |
Number of page(s) | 24 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348732 | |
Published online | 05 July 2024 |
Tomographic cross correlations between galaxy surveys and the CMB gravitational lensing potential
Effect of the redshift bin mismatch
1
Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Bartycka 18, Warsaw 00-716, Poland
e-mail: cssaraf@camk.edu.pl
2
Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 776 Daedeok-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34055, Republic of Korea
3
National Centre for Nuclear Research, ul. L. Pasteura 7, Warsaw 02-093, Poland
e-mail: pawel.bielewicz@ncbj.gov.pl
Received:
25
November
2023
Accepted:
29
March
2024
Context. Upcoming surveys of the large-scale structure of our Universe will employ a large coverage area of about half of the sky and will significantly increase the observational depth. With these surveys, we will be able to cross-correlate cosmic microwave background (CMB) gravitational lensing and galaxy surveys divided into narrow redshift bins to map the evolution of the cosmological parameters with redshift.
Aims. We study the effect of the redshift bin mismatch of objects that is due to photometric redshift errors in tomographic cross-correlation measurements.
Methods. We used the code FLASK to create Monte Carlo simulations of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) and Planck CMB lensing convergence. We simulated log-normal fields and divided galaxies into nine redshift bins with the Gaussian and modified Lorentzian photometric redshift errors. To estimate the parameters, we used angular power spectra of CMB lensing and galaxy density contrast fields and the maximum likelihood estimation method.
Results. We show that even with simple Gaussian errors with a standard deviation of σ(z) = 0.02(1 + z), the galaxy auto-power spectra in tomographic bins are offset by 2 − 15%. The estimated cross-power spectra between galaxy clustering and CMB lensing are also biased, with smaller deviations < 5%. As a result, the σ8 parameter deviates between 0.2 − 1.2σ due to the redshift bin mismatch of the objects. We propose a computationally fast and robust method based on the scattering matrix approach to correct for the redshift bin mismatch of the objects.
Conclusions. The estimates of the parameters in tomographic studies such as the linear galaxy bias, the cross-correlation amplitude, and σ8 are biased due to the redshift bin mismatch of the objects. The biases in these parameters are alleviated with our scattering matrix approach.
Key words: gravitational lensing: weak / methods: numerical / cosmic background radiation
© The Authors 2024
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.