Issue |
A&A
Volume 685, May 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A142 | |
Number of page(s) | 17 | |
Section | Astrophysical processes | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348230 | |
Published online | 17 May 2024 |
Fitting the light curves of Sagittarius A* with a hot-spot model
Bayesian modeling of QU loops in the millimeter band
1
Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, PO Box 9010 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
e-mail: a.yfantis@astro.ru.nl
2
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany
3
Research Centre for Computational Physics and Data Processing, Institute of Physics, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo nám. 13, 746 01 Opava, Czech Republic
Received:
11
October
2023
Accepted:
17
February
2024
Context. Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*) exhibits frequent flaring activity across the electromagnetic spectrum. Signatures of an orbiting hot spot have been identified in the polarized millimeter wavelength light curves observed with ALMA in 2017 immediately after an X-ray flare. The nature of these hot spots remains uncertain.
Aims. We expanded existing theoretical hot-spot models created to describe the Sgr A* polarized emission at millimeter wavelengths. We sampled the posterior space, identifying best-fitting parameters and characterizing uncertainties.
Methods. Using the numerical radiative transfer code ipole, we defined a semi-analytical model describing a ball of plasma orbiting Sgr A*, threaded with a magnetic field and emitting synchrotron radiation. We then explored the posterior space in the Bayesian framework of dynesty. We fit the static background emission separately, using a radiatively inefficient accretion flow model.
Results. We considered eight models with a varying level of complexity, distinguished by choices regarding dynamically important cooling, non-Keplerian motion, and magnetic field polarity. All models converge to realizations that fit the data, but one model without cooling, non-Keplerian motion, and magnetic field pointing toward us improved the fit significantly and also matched the observed circular polarization.
Conclusions. Our models represent observational data well and allow testing various effects in a systematic manner. From our analysis, we have inferred an inclination of ∼155 − 160 deg, which corroborates previous estimates, a preferred period of ∼90 min, and an orbital radius of 9 − 12.0 gravitational radii. Our non-Keplerian models indicate a preference for an orbital velocity of 0.6–0.9 times the Keplerian value. Last, all our models agree on a high dimensionless spin value (a* > 0.8), but the impact of spin on the corresponding light curves is subdominant with respect to other parameters.
Key words: black hole physics / magnetic fields / polarization / methods: numerical / methods: statistical / Galaxy: center
© The Authors 2024
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.