Issue |
A&A
Volume 664, August 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A50 | |
Number of page(s) | 18 | |
Section | Planets and planetary systems | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142849 | |
Published online | 08 August 2022 |
Benchmark tests of transmission spectroscopy using transiting white dwarfs
1
CAS Key Laboratory of Planetary Sciences, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Nanjing
210023,
PR China
e-mail: czjiang@pmo.ac.cn
2
School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Science and Technology of China,
Hefei
230026,
PR China
3
CAS Center for Excellence in Comparative Planetology,
Hefei
230026,
PR China
e-mail: guochen@pmo.ac.cn
4
Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea s/n,
38205
La Laguna
Tenerife, Spain
5
Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna,
Spain
Received:
7
December
2021
Accepted:
9
May
2022
Context. Ground-based transit observations are affected by both telluric absorption and instrumental systematics, which can affect the final retrieved transmission spectrum of an exoplanet. To account for these effects, a better understanding of the impact of different data analyses is needed to improve the accuracy of the retrieved transmission spectra.
Aims. We propose validating ground-based low-resolution transmission spectroscopy using transiting white dwarfs. These targets are selected to have transit parameters comparable with typical transiting hot Jupiters but nondetectable transmission signals due to their extremely high surface gravities. The advantage here is that we know beforehand what the final transmission spectrum should be: a featureless flat spectrum.
Methods. We analyzed two transiting white dwarfs analogous to hot Jupiters, KIC 10657664B and KIC 9164561B. We used various noise models to account for the systematic noise in their spectroscopic light curves following common procedures of transmission spectroscopy analyses. We compared the derived transmission spectra with the broadband transit depth to determine whether there are any artificial offsets or spectral features arising from light-curve fitting.
Results. The results show a strong model dependence, and the transmission spectra exhibit considerable discrepancies when they are computed with different noise models, different reference stars, and different common-mode removal methods. Nonetheless, we can still derive relatively accurate transmission spectra based on a Bayesian model comparison.
Conclusions. With current ground-based instrumentation, the systematics in transit light curves can easily contaminate a transmission spectrum, introducing a general offset or some spurious spectral features and thus leading to a biased interpretation on the planetary atmosphere. Therefore, we suggest that any wiggle within the measurement errors in a transmission spectrum should be interpreted with caution. It is necessary to determine the dependence of results on the adopted noise model through model comparison. The model inferences should be examined through multiple observations and different instruments.
Key words: methods: data analysis / techniques: spectroscopic / binaries: eclipsing / white dwarfs
© C. Jiang et al. 2022
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe-to-Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.