Issue |
A&A
Volume 633, January 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A92 | |
Number of page(s) | 14 | |
Section | The Sun | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936832 | |
Published online | 16 January 2020 |
Determining whether the squashing factor, Q, would be a good indicator of reconnection in a resistive MHD experiment devoid of null points
1
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS, UK
e-mail: jr93@st-andrews.ac.uk, cep@st-andrews.ac.uk
2
Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Received:
2
October
2019
Accepted:
21
November
2019
The squashing factor of a magnetic field, Q, is commonly used as an indicator of magnetic reconnection, but few studies seek to evaluate how reliable it is in comparison with other possible reconnection indicators. By using a full, self-consistent, three-dimensional, resistive magnetohydrodynamic experiment of interacting magnetic strands constituting a coronal loop, Q and several different quantities are determined. Each is then compared with the necessary and sufficient condition for reconnection, namely the integral along a field line of the component of the electric field parallel to the magnetic field. Among the reconnection indicators explored, we find the squashing factor less successful when compared with alternatives, such as Ohmic heating. In a reconnecting magnetic field devoid of null points, our work suggests that Q, being a geometric measure of the magnetic field, is not a reliable indicator of the onset or a diagnostic of the location of magnetic reconnection in some configurations.
Key words: Sun: corona / Sun: magnetic fields / magnetic reconnection / magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
© ESO 2020
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.