Issue |
A&A
Volume 633, January 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A125 | |
Number of page(s) | 22 | |
Section | Extragalactic astronomy | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936078 | |
Published online | 21 January 2020 |
Chemical enrichment and host galaxies of extremely strong intervening DLAs towards quasars⋆
Do they probe the same galactic environments as DLAs associated with γ-ray burst afterglows?
1
Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095, CNRS-SU, 98bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France
e-mail: adarsh.ranjan@iap.fr
2
Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind 411 007, Pune, India
3
Ioffe Institute, Polytekhnicheskaya 26, 194021 Saint Petersburg, Russia
4
European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile
Received:
12
June
2019
Accepted:
12
November
2019
We present the results from VLT/X-shooter spectroscopic observations of 11 extremely strong intervening damped Lyman-α absorbers (ESDLAs) that were initially selected as high N(H I) (i.e. ≥5 × 1021 cm−2) candidates from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). We confirm the high H I column densities, which we measure to be in the range log N(H I) = 21.6 − 22.4. Molecular hydrogen is detected with high column densities (N(H2)≥1018 cm−2) in 5 out of 11 systems, 3 of which are reported here for the first time, and we obtain conservative upper limits on N(H2) for the remaining 6 systems. We also measure the column density of various metal species (Zn II, Fe II, Si II, Cr II, and C I), quantify the absorption-line kinematics (Δv90), and estimate the extinction of the background quasar light (AV) by dust in the absorbing gas. We compare the chemical properties of this sample of ESDLAs, supplemented with literature measurements, to that of DLAs located at the redshift of long-duration γ-ray bursts (GRB-DLAs). We confirm that the two populations are almost indistinguishable in terms of chemical enrichment and gas kinematics. In addition, we find no marked differences in the incidence of H2. All this suggests that ESDLAs and GRB-DLAs probe similar galactic environments. We search for the galaxy counterparts of ESDLAs and find associated emission lines in 3 out of 11 systems, 2 of which are reported here for the first time (at zabs = 2.304 and 2.323 towards the quasars SDSS J002503.03+114547.80 and SDSS J114347.21+142021.60, respectively). The measured separations between the quasar sightlines and the emission associated with the ESDLA galaxy (for a total of five sightlines) are all very small (ρ < 3 kpc). Because our observations are complete up to ρ ∼ 7 kpc, we argue that the emission counterparts of the remaining systems are more likely below the detection limit than outside the search area. While the small impact parameters are similar to what is observed for GRB-DLAs, the associated star formation rates are on average lower than for GRB host galaxies. This is explained by long-duration GRBs being associated with the death of massive stars and therefore pinpointing regions of active star formation in the GRB host galaxies. Our observations support the suggestion from the literature that ESDLAs could act as blind analogues of GRB-DLAs, probing neutral gas with high column density in the heart of high-redshift galaxies, without any prior on the instantaneous star formation rate.
Key words: quasars: absorption lines / line: profiles / galaxies: ISM / galaxies: high-redshift / cosmology: observations / astrochemistry
© A. Ranjan et al. 2020
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.