Issue |
A&A
Volume 564, April 2014
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A75 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Astronomical instrumentation | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423422 | |
Published online | 10 April 2014 |
Cross-calibration of the XMM-Newton EPIC pn and MOS on-axis effective areas using 2XMM sources
1 Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Leicester University, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
e-mail: amr30@star.le.ac.uk
2 XMM-Newton Science Operations Centre, ESAC, Apartado 78, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain
Received: 14 January 2014
Accepted: 13 March 2014
Aims. We aim to examine the relative cross-calibration accuracy of the on-axis effective areas of the XMM-Newton EPIC pn and MOS instruments.
Methods. Spectra from a sample of 46 bright, high-count, non-piled-up, isolated on-axis point sources are stacked together, and model residuals are examined to characterize the EPIC MOS-to-pn inter-calibration.
Results. The MOS1-to-pn and MOS2-to-pn results are broadly very similar. The cameras show the closest agreement below 1 keV, with MOS excesses over pn of 0–2% (MOS1/pn) and 0–3% (MOS2/pn). Above 3 keV, the MOS/pn ratio is consistent with energy-independent (or only mildly increasing) excesses of 7–8% (MOS1/pn) and 5–8% (MOS2/pn). In addition, between 1–2 keV there is a “silicon bump” − an enhancement at a level of 2–4% (MOS1/pn) and 3–5% (MOS2/pn). Tests suggest that the methods employed here are stable and robust.
Conclusions. The results presented here provide the most accurate cross-calibration of the effective areas of the XMM-Newton EPIC pn and MOS instruments to date. They suggest areas of further research where causes of the MOS-to-pn differences might be found, and allow the potential for corrections and possible rectification of the EPIC cameras to be made in the future.
Key words: instrumentation: detectors / instrumentation: miscellaneous / telescopes / X-rays: general
© ESO, 2014
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.