Issue |
A&A
Volume 561, January 2014
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A53 | |
Number of page(s) | 26 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322146 | |
Published online | 23 December 2013 |
Source-lens clustering and intrinsic-alignment bias of weak-lensing estimators⋆
Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA Saclay, CNRS, URA 2306, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France
e-mail: patrick.valageas@cea.fr
Received: 26 June 2013
Accepted: 11 October 2013
Aims. We estimate the amplitude of the source-lens clustering bias and of the intrinsic-alignment bias of weak-lensing estimators of the two-point and three-point convergence and cosmic-shear correlation functions.
Methods. We use a linear galaxy bias model for the galaxy-density correlations, as well as a linear intrinsic-alignment model. For the three-point and four-point density correlations, we use analytical or semi-analytical models, based on a hierarchical ansatz or a combination of one-loop perturbation theory with a halo model.
Results. For two-point statistics, we find that the source-lens clustering bias is typically several orders of magnitude below the weak-lensing signal, except when we correlate a very low-redshift galaxy (z2 ≲ 0.05) with a higher redshift galaxy (z1 ≳ 0.5), where it can reach 10% of the signal for the shear. For three-point statistics, the source-lens clustering bias is typically on the order of 10% of the signal, as soon as the three galaxy source redshifts are not identical. The intrinsic-alignment bias is typically about 10% of the signal for both two-point and three-point statistics. Thus, both source-lens clustering bias and intrinsic-alignment bias must be taken into account for three-point estimators aiming at a better than 10% accuracy.
Key words: gravitational lensing: weak / large-scale structure of Universe
Appendices are available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org
© ESO, 2013
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.