Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 667, November 2022
Article Number A48
Number of page(s) 16
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243954
Published online 04 November 2022
  1. Agapito, G., Plantet, C., Busoni, L., et al. 2020, SPIE, 11448, 114482S [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bara, S., Arines, J., & Pailos, E. 2013, Opt. Eng., 53, 061703 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beutler, F. J. 1966, Siam Rev., 8, 328 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Busoni, L., Agapito, G., Plantet, C., et al. 2019, in 6th International Conference on Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes, AO4ELT 2019, Québec, Canada [Google Scholar]
  5. Conan, R. 2014, in Fast Iterative Optimal Estimation of Turbulence Wavefronts with Recursive Block Toeplitz Covariance Matrix, 9148, 91480R [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  6. Correia, C. M., & Teixeira, J. 2014, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 31, 2763 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Correia, C. M., Bond, C. Z., Sauvage, J.-F., et al. 2017, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 34, 1877 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cranney, J., Guihot, A., De Dona, J., & Rigaut, F. 2021, in 2021 Australian New Zealand Control Conference (ANZCC), 24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deo, V., Gendron, É., Rousset, G., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellerbroek, B. L. 2005, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 22, 310 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellerbroek, B. L., & Rigaut, F. 2001, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 18, 2539 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fruchter, A. S., & Hook, R. N. 2002, PASP, 114, 144 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fusco, T., Conan, J.-M., Rousset, G., Mugnier, L. M., & Michau, V. 2001, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 18, 2527 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fusco, T., Agapito, G., Neichel, B., et al. 2022, J. Astron. Telescopes Instrum. Syst., 8, 021514 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gerchberg, R. 1974, J. Mod. Opt., 21, 709 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guyon, O. 2005, ApJ, 629, 592 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hardy, J. W. 1998, Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes (New York: Oxford) [Google Scholar]
  18. Irani, M., & Peleg, S. 1990, in 10th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Conference C: image, speech, and signal processing, and Conference D: computer architecture for vision in pattern recognition, ICPR 1990, Atlantic City, NJ, USA, 16–21 June, 1990, 2 (IEEE), 115 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kadec, M. I. 1964, Sov. Math. Dokl., 5, 559 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohlenberg, A. 1953, J. Appl. Phys., 24, 1432 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Levinson, N. 1940, in American Mathematical Society Colloquium, 26 [Google Scholar]
  22. Marvasti, F. 2001, Nonuniform Sampling: Theory and Practice, 1, 132 [Google Scholar]
  23. Neichel, B., Fusco, T., & Conan, J.-M. 2009, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 26, 219 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oberti, S., Le Louarn, M., Dialaiti, E., et al. 2017, MAORY design tradeoff study:tomography dimensioning, AO4ELT5 Proceedings https://www.eso.org/~soberti/ [Google Scholar]
  25. Oberti, S., Kolb, J., Madec, P.-Y., et al. 2018, in Adaptive Optics Systems VI, eds. L. M. Close, L. Schreiber, & D. Schmidt, 10703, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 469 [Google Scholar]
  26. Oberti, S., Vérinaud, C., Le Louarn, M., et al. 2019, in 6th International Conference on Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes, AO4ELT 2019, Québec, Canada [Google Scholar]
  27. Oppenheim, A. V., & Willsky, A. S. 1997, Signals & Systems, 2nd edn. (Prentice-Hall, Inc.) [Google Scholar]
  28. Paley, R. E., & Wiener, N. 1934, Am. Math. Soc., 19, 147 [Google Scholar]
  29. Park, S. C., Park, M. K., & Kang, M. G. 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 20, 21 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rigaut, F., & Gendron, E. 1992, A&A, 261, 677 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rigaut, F. J., Véran, J.-P., & Lai, O. 1998, SPIE Conf. Ser., 3353, 1038 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rigaut, F., McDermid, R., Cresci, G., et al. 2020, SPIE Conf. Ser., 11447, 114471R [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  33. Roddier, F. 1999, Adaptive Optics in Astronomy (New York: Cambridge University Press) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tsai, R. Y., & Huang, T. S. 1984, Adv. Comput. Vis. Image Process., 1, 317 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vérinaud, C. 2004, Opt. Comm., 233, 27 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, L., Andersen, D., & Ellerbroek, B. 2012, Appl. Opt., 51, 3692 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, Z., Chen, J., & Hoi, S. C. H. 2021, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 43, 3365 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wiener, N. 1930, Acta Mathematica, 55, 117 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wizinowich, P., Chin, J., Correia, C., et al. 2020, SPIE Conf. Ser., 11448, 114480E [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  40. Woillez, J., Abad, J. A., Abuter, R., et al. 2019, A&A, 629, A41 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.