Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 636, April 2020
Article Number A45
Number of page(s) 11
Section Planets and planetary systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936802
Published online 15 April 2020
  1. Akim, E. L. 1967, Sov. Phys. Dokl., 11, 855 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold, D., Bertone, S., Jäggi, A., Beutler, G., & Mervart, L. 2015, Icarus, 261, 182 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bills, B. G., & Ferrari, A. J. 1980, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 85, 1013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis, J., Herring, T., Shapiro, I., Rogers, A., & Elgered, G. 1985, Radio Sci., 20, 1593 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goossens, S., Matsumoto, K., Kikuchi, F., et al. 2011, Improved High-Resolution Lunar Gravity Field Model From SELENE and Historical Tracking Data, AGU Fall Meeting, P44B-05 [Google Scholar]
  6. Goossens, S., Sabaka, T. J., Nicholas, J. B., et al. 2014, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3367 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goossens, S., Lemoine, F., Sabaka, T., et al. 2016, Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 47, 1484 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goossens, S., Sabaka, T., Fernández Mora, A., & Heijkoop, E. 2018, Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 49, 2477 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goossens, S., Sabaka, T., Wieczorek, M., et al. 2020, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 125, e2019JE006086 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Han, S.-C., Mazarico, E., & Lemoine, F. G. 2009, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L11203 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heiskanen, W., & Moritz, H. 1967, Physical Geodesy (San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company) [Google Scholar]
  12. Hobson, E. W. 1931, The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics (Cambridge: Cambridge Uuniversity Press) [Google Scholar]
  13. Hopfield, H. 1963, Journal of Geophysical Research, 68, 5157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaula, W. M. 1966, Theory of Satellite Geodesy (Waltham, MA: Blaisdell Publishing Company) [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaula, W. M. 2013, in Gravity Anomalies: Unsurveyed Areas, ed. H. Orlin (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons), 9, 58 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klinger, B., Baur, O., & Mayer-Gürr, T. 2014, Planet. Space Sci., 91, 83 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Konopliv, A., Asmar, S., Carranza, E., Sjogren, W., & Yuan, D. 2001, Icarus, 150, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Konopliv, A. S., Park, R. S., Yuan, D.-N., et al. 2013, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 118, 1415 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Konopliv, A. S., Park, R. S., Yuan, D.-N., et al. 2014, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1452 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lemoine, F. G., Smith, D. E., Rowlands, D. D., et al. 2001, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 106, 23359 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lemoine, F. G., Goossens, S., Sabaka, T. J., et al. 2013, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 118, 1676 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lemoine, F. G., Goossens, S., Sabaka, T. J., et al. 2014, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3382 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lorell, J., & Sjogren, W. 1968, Science, 159, 625 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matsumoto, K., Goossens, S., Ishihara, Y., et al. 2010, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 115 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mazarico, E., Lemoine, F., Han, S.-C., & Smith, D. 2010, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 115 [Google Scholar]
  26. Moyer, T. D. 1971, Mathematical Formulation of the Double-Precision Orbit Determination Program. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Tech. Rept., 32, 1527 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  27. Moyer, T. D. 1981, Celest. Mech., 23, 33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Moyer, T. D. 2005, Formulation for Observed and Computed Values of Deep Space Network Data Types for Navigation (New York: John Wiley & Sons), 3 [Google Scholar]
  29. Namiki, N., Iwata, T., Matsumoto, K., et al. 2009, Science, 323, 900 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Park, R., Konopliv, A., Yuan, D., et al. 2015, in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts [Google Scholar]
  31. Pavlis, D. E., Poulose, S. G., & McCarthy, J. J. 2006, GEODYN Operations Manual, (Greenbelt, MD: SGT Inc.), https://space-geodesy.nasa.gov/techniques/tools/GEODYN/GEODYN.html [Google Scholar]
  32. Seidelmann, P. K., Archinal, B. A., A’hearn, M. F., et al. 2007, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 98, 155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith, D. E., Zuber, M. T., Jackson, G. B., et al. 2010, Space Sci. Rev., 150, 209 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thornton, C. L., & Border, J. S. 2003, Radiometric Tracking Techniques for Deep-Space Navigation (New York: John Wiley & Sons) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wei, Y., Yao, Z., & Wan, W. 2018, Nat. Astron., 2, 346 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wieczorek, M. A. 2007, Treatise Geophys., 10, 165 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Williams, J. G., & Boggs, D. H. 2015, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 120, 689 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Williams, J., Boggs, D., & Folkner, W. 2008, DE421 lunar orbit, physical librations, and surface conditions, Tech. rep., Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL Memorandum IOM 335-JW [Google Scholar]
  39. Williams, J. G., Konopliv, A. S., Boggs, D. H., et al. 2014, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 119, 1546 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wirnsberger, H., Krauss, S., & Mayer-Gürr, T. 2019, Icarus, 317, 324 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yan, J., Ping, J., Li, F., et al. 2010, Adv. Space Res., 46, 50 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yan, J., Goossens, S., Matsumoto, K., et al. 2012, Planet. Space Sci., 62, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yan, J., Yang, X., Ping, J., et al. 2018, Astrophys. Space Sci., 363, 125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ye, M., Yan, J., Li, F., et al. 2016, in International Symposium on Lunar and Planetary Science, Wuhan [Google Scholar]
  45. Zuber, M. T., Smith, D. E., Lehman, D. H., et al. 2012, in GRAIL: Mapping the Moon’s Interior (Berlin: Springer), 3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zuber, M. T., Smith, D. E., Watkins, M. M., et al. 2013, Science, 339, 668 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.