Free Access
Volume 620, December 2018
Article Number A59
Number of page(s) 14
Section Numerical methods and codes
Published online 29 November 2018
  1. Björck, A. K. 2015, Numerical Methods in Matrix Computations (Cham: Springer), XVI, 800 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bunn, E. F., Fisher, K. B., Hoffman, Y., et al. 1994, ApJ, 432, L75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cantalupo, C. M., Borrill, J. D., Jaffe, A. H., Kisner, T. S., & Stompor, R. 2010, ApJS, 187, 212 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. de Gasperis, G., Balbi, A., Cabella, P., Natoli, P., & Vittorio, N. 2005, A&A, 436, 1159 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elsner, F., & Wandelt, B. D. 2013, A&A, 549, A111 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Golub, G. H., & Van Loan, C. F. 1996, Matrix Computations, 3rd edn. (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), XXX, 698 [Google Scholar]
  7. Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grigori, L., Stompor, R., & Szydlarski, M. 2012, Proc. Int. Conf. on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC ’12 (Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press), 91:1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Higham, N. J. 2002, Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms, 2nd edn. (Philadelphia, PA: SIAM), XXX, 680 [Google Scholar]
  10. Horn, R. A. 2013, Matrix Analysis, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), XVIII, 643 [Google Scholar]
  11. Huffenberger, K. M. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 3425 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Huffenberger, K. M., & Næss, S. K. 2018, ApJ, 852, 92 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Janssen, M. A., & Gulkis, S. 1992, NATO Advanced Science Institutes (ASI) Ser. C, 359, 391 [Google Scholar]
  14. Liesen, J., & Strakoš, Z. 2013, Krylov Subspace Methods: Principles and Analysis, Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation (Oxford: Oxford University Press), XVI, 391 [Google Scholar]
  15. Næss, S. K., & Louis, T. 2014, JCAP, 8, 045 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Planck Collaboration XIII. 2016, A&A, 594, A13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  17. Poletti, D., Fabbian, G., Le Jeune, M., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A60 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. Puglisi, G., Poletti, D., Fabbian, G., et al. 2018, A&A, 618, A62 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ramanah, D., Lavaux, G., & Wandelt, B. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 1782 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Saad, Y. 2003, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd edn. (Philadelphia, PA: SIAM), XVIII, 528 [Google Scholar]
  21. Seljebotn, D. S., Bærland, T., Eriksen, H. K., Mardal, K. A., & Wehus, I. K. 2017, A&A, submitted, [arXiv:1710.0062] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith, K. M., Zahn, O., & Doré, O. 2007, Phys. Rev. D, 76, 043510 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Strakoš, Z., & Tichý, P. 2005, BIT, 45, 789 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Szydlarski, M., Grigori, L., & Stompor, R. 2014, A&A, 572, A39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.