Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 614, June 2018
Article Number A41
Number of page(s) 8
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832597
Published online 12 June 2018
  1. Andersen, D. R., Jackson, K. J., Blain, C., et al. 2012, PASP, 124, 469 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, J. M., Mair, B. A., Rao, M., & Wu, C. H. 1997, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 16, 159 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auzinger, G. 2015, in On choosing layer profiles in atmospheric tomography, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 595, 012001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Auzinger, G., Le Louarn, M., Obereder, A., & Saxenhuber, D. 2015, in Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes IV, Conf. Proc., E2 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bader, B. W., & Kolda, T. G. 2007, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 30, 205 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beckmann, E. C. 2006, Br. J. Radiol., 79, 5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carmona-Ballester, D., Trujillo-Sevilla, J. M., Bonaque-González, S., Hernández-Delgado, A., & Rodríguez-Ramos, J. M. 2017, Opt. Eng. 57, 061603 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, R., Maimone, A., Fuchs, H., Raskar, R., & Wetzstein, G. 2014, J. Soc. Inf. Disp., 22, 525 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R., Phan, A. H., & Amari, S. I. 2009, Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorizations: Applications to Exploratory Multi-Way Data Analysis and Blind Source Separation 1st edn. (Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons), 1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cormack, A. M. 1964, J. Appl. Phys., 35, 2908 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cortes, A., Neichel, B., Guesalaga, A., et al. 2012, Proc. SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 8447, 1 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elble, J. M., Sahinidis, N. V., & Vouzis, P. 2010, Parallel Comput., 36, 215 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellerbroek, B. L. 2002, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 19, 1803 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Frieze, A., Kannan, R., & Vempala S., 1998, in Proc. 39th Annual Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280), J. ACM, 51, 370 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gaarder, N. T., & Herman, G. T. 1972, Comput. Graphics Image Process., 1, 97 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gordon, R., Bender, R., & Herman, G. T. 1970, J. Theor. Biol., 29, 471 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Herman, G. T., & Meyer, L. B. 1993, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 12, 600 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hounsfield, G. N. 1973, Br. J. Radiol., 46, 1016 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaczmarz, S. 1937, Bull. Int. Acad. Pol. Sci. Lett., 35, 355 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kolda, T. G., & Bader, B. W. 2009, SIAM Rev., 51, 455 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kolmogorov, A. 1941, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 30, 301 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lane, R. G., Glindemann, A., & Dainty, J. C. 1992, Waves in Random Media, 2, 209 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Langville, A. N., Meyer, C. D., & Albright, R. 2006, in Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Le Louarn, M., Hubin, N., Sarazin,M., & Tokovinin, A. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 535 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. 2001, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13, Proc. Conf. NIPS 2000, eds. T. K. Leen, T. G. Dietterich & V. Tresp (NIPSC), 556 [Google Scholar]
  26. Maréchal, A. 1948, Éditions de la Revue d’optique théorique et instrumentale, 21, A2213 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mejía-Roa, E., Tabas-Madrid, D., Setoain, J., et al. 2015, BMC Bioinf., 16, 43 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Morup, M., Hansen, L. K., Parnas, J., & Arnfred, S. M. 2006, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical Report, University of Denmark [Google Scholar]
  29. Natterer, F. 2001, The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography, Classics in applied mathematics, (Philadelphia: SIAM) 32 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Paatero, P., & Tapper, U. 1994, Environmetrics, 5, 111 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pauca, V., Shahnaz, F. W., Berry, M., & Plemmons, R. 2004, in Proc. of the 4th SIAM international conference on data mining (Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA: SIAM) [Google Scholar]
  32. Philip Hart, II V. 2012, PhD Thesis, Utah State University [Google Scholar]
  33. Ramlau, R., & Rosensteiner, M. 2012, Inverse Prob., 28 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ramlau, R., Saxenhuber, D., & Yudytskiy, M. 2014, in Proc. SPIE, 9148, 91480Q [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rigaud, G., Bellet, J. B., Berginc, G., Berechet, I., & Berechet, S. 2016, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 13, 936 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Roddier, F. 1999, Adaptive Optics in Astronomy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 419 [Google Scholar]
  37. Saxenhuber, D., Auzinger, G., Louarn, M. L., & Helin, T. 2017, Appl. Opt., 56, 2621 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Strohmer, T., & Vershynin, R. 2009, J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 15, 262 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tallon, M., & Foy, R. 1990, A&A, 235, 549 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  40. Trujillo-Sevilla, J. 2017, PhD Thesis, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain [Google Scholar]
  41. Vavasis, S. A. 2010, SIAM J. Optim., 20, 1364 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang, Y.-X., & Zhang, Y.-J. 2013, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 25, 1336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wetzstein, G., Lanman, D., Hirsch, M., & Raskar, R. 2012, ACM Trans. Graph. (Proc. SIGGRAPH), 31, 1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.