Gaia Data Release 1
Free Access
Volume 605, September 2017
Gaia Data Release 1
Article Number A52
Number of page(s) 16
Section Astronomical instrumentation
Published online 07 September 2017
  1. Arenou, F., Luri, X., Babusiaux, C., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A50 (Gaia SI) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Andrae, R., Arcay, B., et al. 2013, A&A, 559, A74 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baines, D., Giordano, F., Racero, E., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 028001 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beaumont, C., Goodman, A., & Greenfield, P. 2015, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software an Systems XXIV (ADASS XXIV), eds. A. R. Taylor, & E. Rosolowsky, ASP Conf. Ser., 495, 101 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boch, T., & Fernique, P. 2014, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII, eds. N. Manset, & P. Forshay, ASP Conf. Ser., 485, 277 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonnarel, F., Fernique, P., Bienaymé, O., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Breddels, M. A. 2017, IAU Symp., 325, 299 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, A., Arenou, F., Hambly, N., et al. 2012, Gaia DPAC Technical Note GAIA-C9-TN-LEI-AB-026 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dawson, K. S., Kneib, J.-P., Percival, W. J., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dias, W. S., Alessi, B. S., Moitinho, A., & Lépine, J. R. D. 2002, A&A, 389, 871 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis, G., & Dix, A. 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13, 1216 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eyer, L., Evans, D. W., Mowlavi, N., et al. 2014, in EAS Pub. Ser., 67, 75 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fielding, R. T. 2000, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Irvine, AAI9980887 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gaia Collaboration (Brown, A. G. A., et al.) 2016a, A&A, 595, A2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gaia Collaboration (Prusti, T., et al.) 2016b, A&A, 595, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodman, A. A. 2012, Astron. Nachr., 333, 505 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gorski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Harris, W. E. 1996, AJ, 112, 1487 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hassan, A. H., Fluke, C. J., Barnes, D. G., & Kilborn, V. A. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2442 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hey, T., Tansley, S., & Tolle, K. 2009, The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery (Microsoft Research) [Google Scholar]
  21. Ivezic, Z., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., et al. 2008, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:0805.2366] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jern, M., Johansson, S., Johansson, J., & Franzen, J. 2007, in Proc. Fifth International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization, CMV ’07 (Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society), 85 [Google Scholar]
  23. Katz, D., Cropper, M., Meynadier, F., et al. 2011, in EAS Pub. Ser. 45, eds. C. Turon, F. Meynadier, & F. Arenou, 189 [Google Scholar]
  24. Keim, D. A. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8, 1 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  25. Krone-Martins, A., Ducourant, C., Teixeira, R., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  26. Laureijs, R., Amiaux, J., Arduini, S., et al. 2011, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1110.3193] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lindegren, L., Lammers, U., Bastian, U., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A4 (Gaia SI) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. McConnachie, A. W. 2012, AJ, 144, 4 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ortiz, I., Lusted, J., Dowler, P., et al. 2008, IVOA Recommendation on ADQL 2.0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Peng, W., Ward, M. O., & Rundensteiner, E. A. 2004, IEEE InfoVis, 89 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pourbaix, D. 2011, in AIP Conf. Ser. 1346, eds. J. A. Docobo, V. S. Tamazian, & Y. Y. Balega, 122 [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., Mansfield, J., & Jin, Z. 2005, in Proc. ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 761 [Google Scholar]
  33. Synder, J. P. 1993, Flattening the Earth: Two Thousand Years of Map Projections (University of Chicago Press) [Google Scholar]
  34. Szalay, A., & Gray, J. 2001, Science, 293, 2037 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Szalay, T., Springel, V., & Lemson, G. 2008, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:0811.2055] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tanaka, Y. 2014, in Proc. of the 18th Int. Conf. on Inf. Vis., IV ’14, 170 [Google Scholar]
  37. Tanga, P., Mignard, F., Dell‘Oro, A., et al. 2016, Planet. Space Sci., 123, 87 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Taylor, M. B. 2005, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, eds. P. Shopbell, M. Britton, & R. Ebert, ASP Conf. Ser., 347, 29 [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor, M. B. 2006, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, eds. C. Gabriel, C. Arviset, D. Ponz, & S. Enrique, ASP Conf. Ser., 351, 666 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tukey, J. W. 1977, Exploratory Data Analysis, ed. J. W. Tukey, Behavioral Science: Quantitative Methods (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley) [Google Scholar]
  41. Unwin, A., Theus, M., & Hofmann, H. 2006, Graphics of Large Datasets: Visualizing a Million, 1st edn., Statistics and Computing (Springer) [Google Scholar]
  42. Vagg, D., O’Callaghan, D., Ó hÓgáin, F., et al. 2016, Proc. SPIE, 9913 [Google Scholar]
  43. van Leeuwen, F., Evans, D. W., De Angeli, F., et al. 2017, A&A, 599, A32 (Gaia SI) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wenger, M., Ochsenbein, F., Egret, D., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 9 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, Jr., J. E., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.