Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 598, February 2017
Article Number A37
Number of page(s) 17
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629271
Published online 27 January 2017
  1. Basden, A., Geng, D., Myers, R., & Younger, E. 2010, Appl. Opt., 49, 6354 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basden, A. G., Myers, R. M., & Gendron, E. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1628 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basden, A. G., Chemla, F., Dipper, N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 968 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Basden, A. G., Atkinson, D., Bharmal, N. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 1350 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bitenc, U., Basden, A., Bharmal, N. A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuby, J., Morris, S., Fusco, T., et al. 2010, EAGLE: a MOAO fed multi-IFU NIR workhorse for E-ELT, Proc. SPIE, 7735 [Google Scholar]
  7. Evans, C. J., Lehnert, M. D., Cuby, J.-G., et al. 2008, Science requirements for EAGLE for the E-ELT, Proc. SPIE, 7014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fried, D. L. 1982, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 72, 52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gendron, E., & Léna, P. 1994, A&A, 291, 337 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gendron, E., Vidal, F., Brangier, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gendron, E., Charara, A., Abdelfattah, A., et al. 2014a, Adaptive Optics Systems IV (Montreal, Canada), Proc. SPIE, 9148 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gendron, E., Morel, C., Osborn, J., et al. 2014b, Robustness of tomographic reconstructors versus real atmospheric profiles in the ELT perspective, Proc. SPIE, 9148, 4 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gilles, L., & Ellerbroek, B. L. 2008, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 25, 2427 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gratadour, D., Sevin, A., Brulé, J., Rousset, G., & Gendron, E. 2012, GPUs for adaptive optics: simulations and real-time control, Proc. SPIE, 8447 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gratadour, D., Gendron, E., & Rousset, G. 2013a, Practical issues with phase diversity for NCPA compensation resolved on the CANARY demonstrator, eds. S., Esposito, & L., Fini, Proc. of the Third AO4ELT Conf. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gratadour, D., Sevin, A., Perret, D., & Brule, J. 2013b, Building a reliable, scalable and affordable RTC for AO instruments on ELTs, eds. S., Esposito, & L., Fini, Proc. of the Third AO4ELT Conf. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hammer, F., Sayède, F., Gendron, E., et al. 2002, The FALCON Concept: Multi-Object Spectroscopy Combined with MCAO in Near-IR, eds. J. Bergeron, & G. Monnet, Scientific Drivers for ESO Future VLT/VLTI Instrumentation, 139 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hammer, F., Barbuy, B., Cuby, J. G., et al. 2014, MOSAIC at the E-ELT: A multi-object spectrograph for astrophysics, IGM and cosmology, Proc. SPIE, 9147, 27 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kellerer, A., Vidal, F., Gendron, E., et al. 2012, Deformable mirrors for open-loop adaptive optics, Proc. SPIE, 8447 [Google Scholar]
  20. Martin, O., Gendron, E., Rousset, G., & Vidal, F. 2012, Temporal convergence of phase spatial covariance matrix measurements in tomographic adaptive optics, Proc. SPIE, 8447, 84472A [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. McPherson, A., Spyromilio, J., Kissler-Patig, M., et al. 2012, E-ELT update of project and effect of change to 39 m design, Proc. SPIE, 8444 [Google Scholar]
  22. Morris, T., Gendron, E., Basden, A., et al. 2013, In Multiple Object Adaptive Optics: Mixed NGS/LGS tomography, eds. S., Esposito, & L., Fini, Proc. of the Third AO4ELT Conf. [Google Scholar]
  23. Morris, T., Gendron, E., Basden, A., et al. 2014, CANARY phase B: on-sky open-loop tomographic LGS AO results, Proc. SPIE, 9148, 1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Myers, R. M., Hubert, Z., Morris, T. J., et al. 2008, CANARY: the on-sky NGS/LGS MOAO demonstrator for EAGLE, Proc. SPIE, 7015 [Google Scholar]
  25. Osborn, J., Guzman, D., de Cos Juez, F. J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 2508 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Parenti, R. R., & Sasiela, R. J. 1994, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 11, 288 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Quirós-Pacheco, F., Conan, J.-M., & Petit, C. 2010, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 27, A182 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rigaut, F., Rousset, G., Kern, P., et al. 1991, A&A, 250, 280 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rousset, G., Fusco, T., Assémat, F., et al. 2010, EAGLE MOAO system conceptual design and related technologies, Proc. SPIE, 7736 [Google Scholar]
  30. Sivo, G., Kulcsár, C., Conan, J.-M., et al. 2014, Opt. Exp., 22, 23565 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tallon, M., Tallon-Bosc, I., Béchet, C., et al. 2010, Adaptive Optics Systems: II, eds. B. Ellerbroek, M. Hart, N. Hubin, & P. Wizinowich, Proc. SPIE, 7736 [Google Scholar]
  32. Vidal, F., Gendron, E., & Rousset, G. 2010, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 27, A253 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vidal, F., Gendron, É., Rousset, G., et al. 2014, A&A, 569, A16 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.