Free Access
Volume 575, March 2015
Article Number A90
Number of page(s) 18
Section Numerical methods and codes
Published online 02 March 2015
  1. Barbey, N., Sauvage, M., Starck, J.-L., Ottensamer, R., & Chanial, P. 2011, A&A, 527, A102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. 2009, SIAM J. Imag. Sci., 2, 183 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Begeman, K., Belikov, A. N., Boxhoorn, D. R., et al. 2011, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 27, 319 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatnagar, S., & Cornwell, T. J. 2004, A&A, 426, 747 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhatnagar, S., Cornwell, T. J., Golap, K., & Uson, J. M. 2008, A&A, 487, 419 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bobin, J., Starck, J.-L., & Ottensamer, R. 2008, IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Process., 2, 718 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Candès, E., Romberg, J., & Tao, T. 2006, IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 52, 489 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  8. Candes, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. 2008, J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 14, 877 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carrillo, R. E., McEwen, J. D., & Wiaux, Y. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1223 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carrillo, R. E., McEwen, J. D., & Wiaux, Y. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 3591 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clark, B. G. 1980, A&A, 89, 377 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  12. Combettes, P. L., & Pesquet, J.-C. 2011, in Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering (Springer-Verlag), 185 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cornwell, T. J. 2008, IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Process., 2, 793 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cornwell, T. J., Golap, K., & Bhatnagar, S. 2008, IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Process., 2, 647 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cornwell, T. J., & Perley, R. A. 1992, A&A, 261, 353 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  16. Davis, G., Mallat, S., & Avellaneda, M. 1997, J. Constructive Approximation, 13, 57 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. de Bruyn, A. G., & LOFAR EoR Key Science Project Team 2012, in AAS Meet. Abstracts 219, 214.05 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dewdney, P., Hall, P., Schilizzi, R., & Lazio, T. 2009, Proc. IEEE, 97, 1482 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Donoho, D. 2006, IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 52, 1289 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dubner, G. M., Holdaway, M., Goss, W. M., & Mirabel, I. F. 1998, AJ, 116, 1842 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fannjiang, C. 2013, A&A, 559, A73 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamaker, J. P., Bregman, J. D., & Sault, R. J. 1996, A&AS, 117, 137 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hardy, S. J. 2013, A&A, 557, A134 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hargrave, P. J., & Ryle, M. 1974, MNRAS, 166, 305 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hoaglin, D., Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. 1983, Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics: Applied probability and statistics (Wiley) [Google Scholar]
  26. Högbom, J. A. 1974, A&AS, 15, 417 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  27. Junklewitz, H., Bell, M. R., Selig, M., & Enßlin, T. A. 2013, A&A, submitted [arXiv:1311.5282] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lannes, A., Anterrieu, E., & Marechal, P. 1997, A&AS, 123, 183 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lazio, T. J. W., Cohen, A. S., Kassim, N. E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, L33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leonard, A., Dupé, F.-X., & Starck, J.-L. 2012, A&A, 539, A85 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, F., Brown, S., Cornwell, T. J., & de Hoog, F. 2011a, A&A, 531, A126 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, F., Cornwell, T. J., & de Hoog, F. 2011b, A&A, 528, A31 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  33. McEwen, J. D., & Wiaux, Y. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1318 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. McKean, J., Ker, L., van Weeren, R. J., et al. 2010, PoS(10th EVN Symposium)033 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mitchell, D. A., Greenhill, L. J., Wayth, R. B., et al. 2008, IEEE J. Select. Topics Signal Process., 2, 707 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pandey, V. N., van Zwieten, J. E., de Bruyn, A. G., & Nijboer, R. 2009, in The Low-Frequency Radio Universe, eds. D. J. Saikia, D. A. Green, Y. Gupta, & T. Venturi, ASP Conf. Ser., 407, 384 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramos, E. P. R. G., Vio, R., & Andreani, P. 2011, A&A, 528, A75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rau, U., & Cornwell, T. J. 2011, A&A, 532, A71 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sault, R. J., Hamaker, J. P., & Bregman, J. D. 1996, A&AS, 117, 149 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schwab, F. R. 1984, AJ, 89, 1076 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shulevski, A. 2010, Ph.D. Thesis, Leiden University, The Netherlands [Google Scholar]
  42. Smirnov, O. M. 2011, A&A, 527, A106 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stappers, B. W., Hessels, J. W. T., Alexov, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A80 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Starck, J., & Bijaoui, A. 1991, in High Resolution Imaging by Interferometry (European Southern Observatory), 853 [Google Scholar]
  45. Starck, J.-L., & Murtagh, F. 2006, Astronomical Image and Data Analysis, 2nd edn. (Springer) [Google Scholar]
  46. Starck, J.-L., Bijaoui, A., Lopez, B., & Perrier, C. 1994, A&A, 283, 349 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  47. Starck, J. L., Donoho, D. L., & Candès, E. J. 2003, A&A, 398, 785 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  48. Starck, J.-L., Murtagh, F., & Fadili, M. 2010, Sparse Image and Signal Processing (Cambridge University Press) [Google Scholar]
  49. Steenbrugge, K. C., Heywood, I., & Blundell, K. M. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 67 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sutter, P. M., Wandelt, B. D., McEwen, J. D., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 768 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tasse, C., van Diepen, G., van der Tol, S., et al. 2012, Comptes Rendus Physique, 13, 28 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tasse, C., van der Tol, S., van Zwieten, J., van Diepen, G., & Bhatnagar, S. 2013, A&A, 553, A105 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  53. van Haarlem, M. P., Wise, M. W., Gunst, A. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vũ, B. C. 2013, Adv. Comput. Math., 38, 667 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wakker, B., & Schwarz, U. 1988, ARA&A, 200, 312 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wenger, S., Magnor, M., Pihlström, Y., Bhatnagar, S., & Rau, U. 2010, PASP, 122, 1367 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wenger, S., Rau, U., & Magnor, M. 2013, Astron. Comput., 1, 40 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wiaux, Y., Jacques, L., Puy, G., Scaife, A. M. M., & Vandergheynst, P. 2009a, MNRAS, 395, 1733 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wiaux, Y., Puy, G., Boursier, Y., & Vandergheynst, P. 2009b, MNRAS, 400, 1029 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wilson, T. L., Rohlfs, K., & Hüttemeister, S. 2009, Tools of Radio Astronomy (Springer-Verlag) [Google Scholar]
  61. Wolz, L., McEwen, J. D., Abdalla, F. B., Carrillo, R. E., & Wiaux, Y. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 1993 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wucknitz, O. 2010, PoS(ISKAF2010)058 [Google Scholar]
  63. Yatawatta, S., de Bruyn, A. G., Brentjens, M. A., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A136 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zarka, P., Girard, J. N., Tagger, M., & Denis, L. 2012, in SF2A-2012: Proc. of the Annual meet. of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics, eds. S. Boissier, P. de Laverny, N. Nardetto, et al., 687 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.