Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 508, Number 2, December III 2009
Page(s) 1085 - 1094
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913089
Published online 04 November 2009
  1. BenMoussa, A. 2006a, Pre-Analysis Report - Final calibration GI beamline (1-30 nm) - PROBA2/LYRA, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory of Belgium [Google Scholar]
  2. BenMoussa, A. 2006b, Pre-Analysis Report - Final calibration NI beamline (40-240 nm) - PROBA2/LYRA, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory of Belgium [Google Scholar]
  3. BenMoussa, A., Schühle, U., Haenen, K., et al. 2004, Physica Status Solidi Applied Research, 201, 2536 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. BenMoussa, A., Schühle, U., Scholze, F., et al. 2006a, Measurement Science and Technology, 17, 913 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. BenMoussa, A., Theissen, A., Scholze, F., et al. 2006b, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A, 568, 398 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  6. BenMoussa, A., Soltani, A., Haenen, K., et al. 2008, Semiconductor Science Technology, 23, 035026 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berghmans, D., Hochedez, J. F., Defise, J. M., et al. 2006, Adv. Space Res., 38, 1807 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dammasch, I. 2006, LYRA Flatfield Software: Relative Output as Function of Pointing, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory of Belgium [Google Scholar]
  9. Dammasch, I. 2007, LYRA Dark Current and LED Measurements, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory of Belgium [Google Scholar]
  10. Dammasch, I. 2008, LYRA Responsivity: Update, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory of Belgium [Google Scholar]
  11. Dammasch, I. 2009a, LYRA Calibration Methods: New channels, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory of Belgium [Google Scholar]
  12. Dammasch, I. 2009b, LYRA Output: Expected Variations, Tech. Rep., Royal Observatory of Belgium [Google Scholar]
  13. Hochedez, J.-F., Schmutz, W., Stockman, Y., et al. 2006, Adv. Space Res., 37, 303 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richter, M., Hollandt, J., Kroth, U., et al. 2003, Metrologia, 40, 107 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scholze, F., Beckhoff, B., Brandt, G., et al. 2000, in SPIE Conf. Ser. 4146, ed. W. M. Kaiser & R. H. Stulen, 72 [Google Scholar]
  16. Scholze, F., Tummler, J., & Ulm, G. 2003, Metrologia, 40, S224 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Woods, T. N., & Chamberlin, P. C. 2009, Adv. Space Res., 43, 349 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Woods, T. N., Eparvier, F. G., Bailey, S. M., et al. 2005a, J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.), 110, 1312 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Woods, T. N., Rottman, G., & Vest, R. 2005b, Sol. Phys., 230, 345 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.