Issue 
A&A
Volume 576, April 2015



Article Number  A104  
Number of page(s)  33  
Section  Interstellar and circumstellar matter  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201424082  
Published online  13 April 2015 
Online material
Appendix A: Noise estimates for Planck smoothed maps
Here, we show how to smooth polarization maps and derive the covariance matrix associated to the smoothed maps.
Appendix A.1: Analytical expressions for smoothing maps of the Stokes parameters and noise covariance matrices
Smoothing total intensity maps is straightforward, but this is not the case for polarization maps. Because the polarization frame follows the sky coordinates and rotates from one centre pixel to a neighbouring pixel whose polarization will be included in the smoothing, in principle the (Q,U) doublet must be also rotated at the same time (e.g., Keegstra et al. 1997). The issue is similar for evaluating the effects of smoothing on the 3 × 3 noise covariance matrix, though with mathematically distinct results. In this Appendix, we present an exact analytical solution to the local smoothing of maps of the Stokes I, Q, and U, as well as the effects of smoothing on their corresponding noise covariance matrix.
Fig. A.1
Definition of points and angles on the sphere involved in the geometry of the smoothing of polarization maps (adapted from Keegstra et al. 1997). J is the position of the centre of the smoothing beam, and K a neighbouring pixel, with spherical coordinates (ϕ_{⋆}, θ_{⋆}) and (ϕ_{k}, θ_{k}), respectively. The great circle passing through J and K is shown in blue. The position angles ψ_{⋆} and ψ_{k} here are in the HEALPix convention, increasing from Galactic north toward decreasing Galactic longitude (west) on the celestial sphere as seen by the observer at O. 

Open with DEXTER 
Appendix A.1.1: Smoothing of Stokes parameters
Figure A.1 presents the geometry of the problem. Let us consider a HEALPix pixel j at point J on the celestial sphere, with spherical coordinates (ϕ_{⋆},θ_{⋆}). To perform smoothing around this position with a Gaussian beam with standard deviation σ_{1 / 2} = FWHM/ 2.35 centred at the position of this pixel we select all HEALPix pixels that fall within 5 times the FWHM of the smoothing beam (this footprint is sufficient for all practical purposes). Let k be one such pixel, centred at the point K with coordinates (ϕ_{k}, θ_{k}), at angular distance β from J defined by (A.1)The normalized Gaussian weight is then (A.2)and ∑ _{k}w_{k} = 1. Before averaging in the Gaussian beam, we need to rotate the polarization reference frame in K so as align it with that in J. For that the reference frame is first rotated by ψ_{k} into the great circle running through K and J, then translated to J, and finally rotated through −ψ_{⋆}. The net rotation angle of the reference frame from point K to point J is then (A.3)Due to the cylindrical symmetry around axis z, evaluating does not depend on the longitudes ϕ_{⋆} and ϕ_{k} taken separately, but only on their difference (A.4)Using spherical trigonometry in Fig. A.1 with the HEALPix convention for angles ψ_{⋆} and ψ_{k}, we find: To derive ψ_{k} and ψ_{⋆} we use the twoparameter arctan function that resolves the π ambiguity in angles: (A.9)Because of the tan implicitly used, sinβ (a positive quantity) is eliminated in the evaluation of ψ_{⋆}, ψ_{k}, and .
We can now proceed to the rotation. It is equivalent to rotate the polarization frame at point K by the angle , or to rotate the data triplet (I_{k}, Q_{k}, U_{k}) at point K by an angle around the axis I. The latter is done with the rotation matrix (e.g., Tegmark & de OliveiraCosta 2001) (A.10)Finally, the smoothed I, Q, and U maps are calculated by: (A.11)
Appendix A.1.2: Computing the noise covariance matrix for smoothed polarization maps
We want to compute the noise covariance matrix [ C] _{⋆} at the position of a HEALPix pixel j for the smoothed polarization maps, given the noise covariance matrix [ C ] at the higher resolution of the original data. We will assume that the noise in different pixels is uncorrelated. From the given covariance matrix [ C ] _{k} at any pixel k we can produce random realizations of Gaussian noise through the Cholesky decomposition of the covariance matrix: where in the decomposition is the transpose of the matrix [ L ] _{k} and (G)_{k} = (G_{I},G_{Q},G_{U})_{k} is a vector of normal Gaussian variables for I, Q, and U.
Applying Eq. (A.11) to the Gaussian noise realization, we obtain (A.14)The covariance matrix of the smoothed at the position J is given by (A.15)If the noise in distinct pixels is independent, as assumed, then ⟨ (G)_{k} (G)_{i} ⟩ = δ_{ki}, the Kronecker symbol, and so (A.16)which can be computed easily with Eq. (A.10).
Developing each term of the matrix, we can see more explicitly how the smoothing mixes the different elements^{9} of the noise covariance matrix: where we note that and depend on j and k. The mixing of the different elements of the covariance matrix during the smoothing is due not to the smoothing itself, but to the rotation of the polarization frame within the smoothing beam.
Appendix A.1.3: Smoothing of the noise covariance matrix with a Monte Carlo approach
For the purpose of this paper, we obtained smoothed covariance matrices using a Monte Carlo approach.
We first generate correlated noise maps (n_{l}, n_{Q}, n_{U}) on I, Q, and U at the resolution of the data using (A.23)where G_{l}, G_{Q}, and G_{U} are Gaussian normalized random vectors and L is the Cholesky decomposition of the covariance matrix [ C ] defined in Eq. (A.12).
Fig. B.1
Upper panels: difference between the conventional and the Bayesian mean posterior estimates of p and ψ as a function of the conventional estimate. Lower panels: Bayesian mean posterior estimates of σ_{p} and σ_{ψ} as a function of the conventional estimate. The dashed red lines show where the two methods give the same result. Each plot shows the density of points in logscale for the Planck data at 1° resolution. The dotted line in the lower right plot shows the value for pure noise. The colour scale shows the pixel density on a log_{10} scale. 

Open with DEXTER 
The above noise I, Q, an U maps are then smoothed to the requested resolution using the smoothing procedure of the HEALPix package. The noise maps are further resampled using the udgrade procedure of the HEALPix package, so that pixellization respects the Shannon theorem for the desired resolution. The smoothed covariance matrices for each sky pixel are then derived from the statistics of the smoothed noise maps. The Monte Carlo simulations have been performed using 1000 realizations.
Both the analytical and the Monte Carlo approaches have been estimated on the Planck data and shown to give equivalent results.
Appendix B: Debiasing methods
Because p is a quadratic function of the observed Stokes parameters (see Eq. (1)) it is affected by a positive bias in the presence of noise. The bias becomes dominant at low S/N. Below we describe briefly a few of the techniques that have been investigated in order to correct for this bias. For a full discussion of the various debiasing methods, see the introductions in Montier et al. (2015a,b) and references therein.
Appendix B.1: Conventional method (method 1)
This method is the conventional determination often used on extinction polarization data. It uses the internal variances provided with the Planck data, which includes the white noise estimate on the total intensity (C_{II}) as well as on the Q and U Stokes parameters (C_{QQ} and C_{UU}) and the offdiagonal terms of the noise covariance matrix (C_{IQ},C_{IU},C_{QU}).
The debiased p^{2} values are computed using (B.1)where is the variance of p computed from the observed Stokes parameters and the associated variances as follows: (B.2)The uncertainty on ψ is given by (B.3)where σ_{P} is the uncertainty on the polarized intensity: (B.4)In the case where I is supposed to be perfectly known, C_{II} = C_{IQ} = C_{IU} = 0, (B.5)Because it is based on derivatives around the true value of the I, Q, and U parameters, this is only valid in the high S/N regime. The conventional values of uncertainties derived above are compared to the ones obtained using the Bayesian approach in Fig. B.1.
Appendix B.2: Time crossproduct method (method 2)
This method consists in computing cross products between estimates of Q and U with independent noise properties. In the case of Planck HFI, each sky pixel has been observed at least four times and the four independent surveys can be used for this purpose. Another option is to use halfring maps which have been produced from the first and second halves of each ring. These methods have the disadvantage of using only part of the data, but the advantage of efficiently debiasing the data if the noise is effectively independent, without assumptions about the Q and U uncertainties.
In that case, can be computed as (B.6)where the sum is carried out either over independent survey maps or halfring maps.
The uncertainty of p^{2} can in turn be evaluated from the dispersion between pairs (B.7)
Appendix B.3: Bayesian methods (method3)
We use a method based on the one proposed by Quinn (2012) and extended to the more general case of an arbitrary covariance matrix by Montier et al. (2015a). We use the Mean Posterior Bayesian (MB) estimator described in Montier et al. (2015b). Unlike the conventional method presented in Sect. B.1, this method is in principle accurate at any signaltonoise ratio. Figure B.1 compares the Bayesian predictions for p and ψ and their uncertainties σ_{p} and σ_{ψ} with those obtained from the conventional method (Eqs. (1), (2), and (B.1)–(B.4)) as predicted from the Planck data at 1deg resolution. As can be seen in the figure, the bias on p is generally important even at this low resolution. The conventional uncertainties are accurate only at low uncertainties, as expected because Eqs. (B.4) and (B.5) are obtained from Taylor expansion around the true values of the parameters. The difference in the uncertainties is the greatest for σ_{ψ} as the true value can only reach 52deg for purely random orientations.
Appendix C: Tests on the bias of
We have performed tests in which we used the Planck noise covariance matrices in order to check that the structures we observe in the maps of the polarization angle dispersion function are not caused by systematic noise bias. One of the tests (called ) consisted of assigning each pixel a random polarization angle ψ. The second one (called ) consisted of setting ψ to a constant value over the whole sky map, which leads to (except near the poles). In that case, changing ψ in the data was done while preserving the value of p and σ_{p} computed as in Eq. (B.2), through the appropriate modification of I, Q, and U. The tests also use the noise covariance of the data, so that the tests are performed with the same sky distribution of the polarization S/N as in the data. This is critical for investigating the spatial distribution of the noiseinduced bias on . In both tests, we added correlated noise on I, Q, and U using the actual noise covariance matrix at each pixel, and computed the map of using Eq. (6) and the same lag value as for the Planck data.
Figure C.1 (upper) shows the histograms of the values obtained for these two tests, both for the whole sky and in the mask used in the analysis of the real data. histograms peak at the value of for Gaussian noise only (no signal, ). The corresponding map of does not exhibit the filamentary structure of the actual data shown in Fig. 12. Similarly, the test histograms of do not resemble that of the real data shown in Fig. 14.
The test is important for assessing the amplitude of the noiseinduced bias, as Monte Carlo simulations show that assuming a true value of maximizes the bias. We therefore use this test as a determination of the upper limit for the bias given the polarization fraction and noise properties of the data. Figure C.1 (upper) shows that the histograms of the recovered values peak at . The histogram is also narrower in the high S/N region than over larger sky regions at lower S/N. In the high S/N mask, 60% of the data points have a noiseinduced bias smaller than 1.6°, and 97% have a bias smaller than 9.6°. The maps of the bias computed for this test show a correlation with the map of . However, as shown in Fig. C.1 (lower panel), the effect of the bias (the size of the offset) is small at high values of for most pixels and can reach up to 50% for a larger fraction of points at lower values (say below ). This
bias correction does not significantly change the structure of the map shown in Fig. 12 and so, in particular, bias does not cause the filamentary structures observed. We note, however, that the noiseinduced bias can change the slope of the correlation between and p.
Fig. C.1
Upper: histogram of obtained on simulated data assuming either (curves peaking at ) or a random value for (curves peaking at ) and noise simulated using the actual Planck noise covariance matrices. The green and black curves show the histograms over the sky fraction shown in Fig. 4 and the blue and red curves show histograms where the S/N on is larger than 3. The vertical dashed line shows , which is the value for pure random noise on Q and U. Lower: distribution of the biascorrected ( minus the offset derived from a simulation with ), with respect to , in the region where the S/N on is larger than 3. Dashed lines show =offset), with n = 1,2, 5, and 10. The colour scale shows the pixel density on a log_{10} scale. 

Open with DEXTER 
© ESO, 2015
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.