EDP Sciences
Press Release
Highlight
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 532, August 2011
Article Number L2
Number of page(s) 6
Section Letters
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117377
Published online 14 July 2011

Online material

thumbnail Fig. 4

Sensitivity of 1670 GHz east and west limb line profiles to (top) torus central position and (bottom) gas dispersion velocity. Top: model calculations, performed here for a radially infinitely narrow torus located at 2, 3, 4, and 6 Saturn radii (RS), confirm that the absorbing material is located near 4 RS, and not e.g. in Saturn’s main rings at  <2 RS. Bottom: model calculations for several values of molecule dispersion velocity Vrms. Best fits are obtained for Vrms = 2.3 km s-1 (resp. 2.0 km s-1) for the east (resp. west) limb spectrum. Dynamically colder models with Vrms = 0.8 km s-1 or Vrms = 0.5 km s-1 (typical of plume material ejection conditions) produce too narrow absorptions.

Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 5

Additional model fits of the 1670 GHz north, center and south observations. Determination of the torus vertical scale height H. Assuming that the column density falls as N(z) = Neq ez/H, where z is the distance from the equatorial plane, the red, green, and dark blue curves correspond to H = 0.8, 0.4, and 0.2 RS, and Neq = (2.5, 4, 8) × 1013 cm-2, respectively. The lower absorption in the northern spectrum compared to center and south indicates that RS. Test of a physical model. The light blue curves are based on the distribution of NH2O predicted from the Cassidy & Johnson (2010) model for a 0.85 × 1028 s-1 Enceladus source rate (and shown in the left panel of Fig. 3, main text). This model provides an overall good match of all H2O lines, including the sorth-south asymmetry. Although not shown here, this physical model also gives a good match of the 557 and 1113 GHz absorption, and also underestimates the 987 GHz absorption by a factor  ~1.7.

Open with DEXTER


© ESO, 2011

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.