Age and metallicity of star clusters in the Small Magellanic Cloud from integrated spectroscopy

Free Access

Issue		A&A Volume 520, September-October 2010


Article Number		A85
Number of page(s)		17
Section		Stellar atmospheres
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912894
Published online		07 October 2010

Online Material

Appendix A: Spectral fits

$\begin{figure} \begin{flushleft} In this section, the best fits are shown for ea... ...}\vspace*{3mm} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA1.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.1: Upper panel: observed spectrum (black line) for the cluster HW1 and the best model fitted by S TARLIGHT+PEGASE-HR (blue line). Lower panel: residuals of the fit.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA2.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.2: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster K3 (ESO).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA3.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.3: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster K3 (LNA).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA4.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.4: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster L3.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA5.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.5: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster L11.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA6.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.6: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster L113.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA7.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.7: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 121 (ESO).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA8.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.8: Same as Fig. A.1 for NGC 121 (LNA).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA9.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.9: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 152.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA10.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.10: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 222.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA11.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.11: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 256.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA12.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.12: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 269.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA13.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.13: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 294.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA14.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.14: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 361 (ESO99).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA15.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.15: Same as Fig. A.1 for NGC 361 (ESO00).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA16.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.16: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 419.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA17.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.17: Same as Fig. A.1 for cluster NGC 458.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA18.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.18: Upper panel: observed spectrum (black line) for the cluster HW1 and the best model fitted by ULySS+PEGASE-HR (blue line). Red pixels correspond to regions of telluric lines and were rejected from the fit. Lower panel: residuals of the fit. The continuous green lines mark the 1- $\sigma$ deviation.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA19.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.19: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster K3 (ESO).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA20.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.20: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster K3 (LNA).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA21.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.21: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster L3.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA22.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.22: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster L11.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA23.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.23: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster L113.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA24.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.24: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 121 (ESO).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA25.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.25: Same as Fig. A.18 for NGC 121 (LNA).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA26.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.26: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 152.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA27.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.27: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 222.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA28.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.28: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 256.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA29.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.29: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 269.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA30.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.30: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 294.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA31.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.31: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 361 (ESO99).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA32.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.32: Same as Fig. A.18 for NGC 361 (ESO00).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA33.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.33: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 419.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=8.8cm,clip]{12894fgA34.ps} \end{figure}$	Figure A.34: Same as Fig. A.18 for cluster NGC 458.
Open with DEXTER

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.