Open Access
Table 2
Mass estimates in the nuclear bulge region compared with the literature.
| Region |
M [108 M⊙] |
σM [108 M⊙] |
Method | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBF region (same observed area) | ||||
| NBF | 1.85 | 0.30 | RC counts | This work |
| NBF | 0.73 | − | Self-consistent NSD model | 1 |
| NBF | 1.63 | − | Dynamical/model-based estimate | 2 |
| Whole NB | ||||
| NB | 12.2 | 2.6 | Area-scaled empirical mass | This work |
| NB | 6.9 | 2.0 | Jeans / hydrodynamical dynamical mass | 3,4 |
| NB | 10.5 | 1.0 | Self-consistent dynamical model | 1 |
| NB | 14.2 | 6.0 | Fixed M/L assumption | 5 |
Notes. (1) Sormani et al. (2022); (2) Hunter et al. (2024); (3) Sormani et al. (2020a); (4) Li et al. (2022); (5) Launhardt et al. (2002).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.