Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1)

Open Access

Table 2.

Right ascension and declination of each EDF from Euclid Collaboration: Aussel et al. (2026) and their respective number of sources and impact of quality cuts.

Field	RA	Dec	Q1 Catalogue	Good flagsa	Magnitude bins

					18 < I_E ≤ 21	21 < I_E ≤ 22	22 < I_E ≤ 24.5
EDF-N	269 $\overset{°}{.}$ $Mathematical equation: $ {{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}} $$ 733	66 $\overset{°}{.}$ $Mathematical equation: $ {{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}} $$ 018	11 378 352	7 573 476	115 606	192 722	2 568 146
EDF-S	61 $\overset{°}{.}$ $Mathematical equation: $ {{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}} $$ 241	−48 $\overset{°}{.}$ $Mathematical equation: $ {{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}} $$ 423	13 060 965	8 913 816	127 649	217 375	3 056 362
EDF-F	52 $\overset{°}{.}$ $Mathematical equation: $ {{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}} $$ 932	−28 $\overset{°}{.}$ $Mathematical equation: $ {{{\overset{\circ}{.}}}} $$ 088	5 328 489	3 705 597	51 294	88 629	1 326 915

Notes. ^(a)These are the ‘quality-filtered’ catalogues.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.