Open Access
Fig. 12.
Download original image
Comparison of the bias, NMAD, and outlier fraction as functions of the percentage of labels used for training, for true redshift (DESI spec-z) versus Euclid photo-z predictions. Results are shown for the VIS (left), VIS + NISP (middle), and VIS + NISP + SED (right) configurations.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.