Table 6.
Outflow properties derived from the Hα emission based on MEGARA data (tertiary component).
| Instrument | vout | Mout | Ṁout | Ekin | Ėkin | Ṗout | Ṗout/Ṗrad | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (km s−1) | (M⊙) | (M⊙ yr−1) | (erg) | (erg s−1) | (cm g s−2) | |||
| ×107 | ×1056 | ×1043 | ×1035 | |||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
| MEGARA | 1461.0 ± 155.9 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 49.2 ± 18.3 | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 7.6 ± 3.1 | 4.5 ± 1.8 | 26.7 ± 10.3 | RV05; ne = 500 |
| MEGARA | 1461.0 ± 155.9 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 9.8 ± 6.7 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 0.9 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 3.2 | RV05; ne = 2500 |
| ★MEGARA | 2247.3 ± 248.9 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 75.7 ± 28.2 | 2.9 ± 0.8 | 18.6 ± 7.6 | 10.7 ± 4.2 | 61.3 ± 24.5 | RV13; ne = 500 |
| ★MEGARA | 2247.3 ± 248.9 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 15.1 ± 10.3 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 3.7 ± 2.6 | 2.1 ± 1.5 | 12.6 ± 8.7 | RV13; ne = 2500 |
| LMT [L18] | −660 [−1600] | 15.4 ± 4.9 | 480 [1162] | – | – | 20 | 117 [11–670] | RV13 |
| ★NOEMA [L23] | 1280 ± 480 | 10.0 ± 3.5 | 46 [21–78] | – | – | ∼3.4 [1-8] | ∼20 [6-46] | RV13 (α = 0.5) |
| ★NOEMA [L23] | 1280 ± 480 | 15.8 ± 5.4 | ∼73 [34-122] | – | – | ∼5 [1.5-12] | ∼31 [9–72] | RV13 (α = 0.8) |
| XMM-Newton [L15] | ∼30000 | 1.87 ± 0.62 | ||||||
Notes. Col. (1): Instrument considered. The references L15, L18, and L23 correspond to Longinotti et al. (2015), Longinotti et al. (2018), and Longinotti et al. (2023), which report the derivation of the outflow parameters based on XMM-Newton, LMT, and NOEMA data, respectively. The original and scaled results from these datasets are also shown. In boldface we highlight the main MEGARA results derived under our assumptions (see text). The star symbol (★) marks the NOEMA and MEGARA results that can be directly compared, since they used the same vout formula (see Col. 9). The NOEMA values were normalized using C = 1 (see text for details). Col (2): velocity of the outflow derived according to the formula described in Col (9). Col (3-7): mass of the outflow, mass outflow rate, kinetic energy of the outflow and kinetic power of the outflow obtained following Eqs. (5), (6), (7) (see text for details). The molecular radius derived in Longinotti et al. (2023) is RCO = 2.8 ± 0.3 kpc. The intrinsic ionized outflow radius derived in this work is Rout(Hα) = 0.98 ± 0.32 kpc. Col (8): ratio between the momentum rate of the outflow Ṗout and Ṗrad = Lbol/c = 1.7 × 1034 g cm s−2 is the radiation force of the AGN, with Lbol = 5.2 × 1044 erg s−1 (Giroletti et al. 2017; Longinotti et al. 2018). Col (9): Assumptions considered to derive the outflow parameters with the different instruments: (i) to derive the ionized outflow velocity, two formulas are used: vout = Δv + 1.18 σB from Rupke et al. (2005) (RV05), and vout = Δv + 2 σB from Rupke & Veilleux (2013) (RV13); (ii) to derive the ionized outflow mass, two electron densities (ne = 500 and 2500 cm−3) are considered for the MEGARA data; (iii) to derive the molecular outflow mass, two CO-to-H2 conversion factor values, αCO, are considered in Longinotti et al. (2023): αCO = 0.5 and 0.8 M⊙ (K km s−1 pc2)−1.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.