Table A.1.
Percentual mean relative error (MRE) between the tabulated MAHs of van den Bosch et al. (2014) and Correa et al. (2015), and the ones obtained from our simulation.
| MRE (%) | |||
| Mass range (at z = 0) | Correa+15 | vdB+14 | |
| > 1014 M⊙ | most-bound | 50.2 | 23.3 |
| most-massive | 29.3 | 9.1 | |
| (5 × 1013 − 1014)M⊙ | most-bound | 51.1 | 26.4 |
| most-massive | 30.0 | 10.7 | |
| (1 × 1013 − 5 × 1013)M⊙ | most-bound | 27.1 | 15.0 |
| most-massive | 29.7 | 16.4 | |
Notes. For each couple of rows, the upper one corresponds to the most-bound method (used in this work), while the bottom one has been obtained by the most-massive method.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.